Cargando…

Motivations underpinning honeybee management practices: A Q methodology study with UK beekeepers

Beekeepers are central to pollinator health. For policymakers and beekeeping organisations to develop widely accepted strategies to sustain honeybee populations alongside wild pollinators, a structured understanding of beekeeper motivations is essential. UK beekeepers are increasing in number, with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kahane, Fay, Osborne, Juliet, Crowley, Sarah, Shaw, Rosalind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9378798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35588040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01736-w
_version_ 1784768588252446720
author Kahane, Fay
Osborne, Juliet
Crowley, Sarah
Shaw, Rosalind
author_facet Kahane, Fay
Osborne, Juliet
Crowley, Sarah
Shaw, Rosalind
author_sort Kahane, Fay
collection PubMed
description Beekeepers are central to pollinator health. For policymakers and beekeeping organisations to develop widely accepted strategies to sustain honeybee populations alongside wild pollinators, a structured understanding of beekeeper motivations is essential. UK beekeepers are increasing in number, with diverse management styles despite calls for coordinated practice to manage honeybee health. Our Q methodology study in Cornwall, UK, indicated five beekeeping perspectives; conventional hobbyists, natural beekeepers, black bee farmers, new-conventional hobbyists and pragmatic bee farmers. Motivations can be shared across perspectives but trade-offs (notably between economic, social responsibility and ideological motivations) result in differing practices, some of which counter ‘official’ UK advice and may have implications for pollinator health and competition. Honeybee conservation emerged as a key motivator behind non-conventional practices, but wild pollinator conservation was not prioritised by most beekeepers in practice. Q methodology has the potential to facilitate non-hierarchical collaboration and conceptualisation of sustainable beekeeping, moving towards co-production of knowledge to influence policy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13280-022-01736-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9378798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93787982022-08-17 Motivations underpinning honeybee management practices: A Q methodology study with UK beekeepers Kahane, Fay Osborne, Juliet Crowley, Sarah Shaw, Rosalind Ambio Research Article Beekeepers are central to pollinator health. For policymakers and beekeeping organisations to develop widely accepted strategies to sustain honeybee populations alongside wild pollinators, a structured understanding of beekeeper motivations is essential. UK beekeepers are increasing in number, with diverse management styles despite calls for coordinated practice to manage honeybee health. Our Q methodology study in Cornwall, UK, indicated five beekeeping perspectives; conventional hobbyists, natural beekeepers, black bee farmers, new-conventional hobbyists and pragmatic bee farmers. Motivations can be shared across perspectives but trade-offs (notably between economic, social responsibility and ideological motivations) result in differing practices, some of which counter ‘official’ UK advice and may have implications for pollinator health and competition. Honeybee conservation emerged as a key motivator behind non-conventional practices, but wild pollinator conservation was not prioritised by most beekeepers in practice. Q methodology has the potential to facilitate non-hierarchical collaboration and conceptualisation of sustainable beekeeping, moving towards co-production of knowledge to influence policy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13280-022-01736-w. Springer Netherlands 2022-05-19 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9378798/ /pubmed/35588040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01736-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Kahane, Fay
Osborne, Juliet
Crowley, Sarah
Shaw, Rosalind
Motivations underpinning honeybee management practices: A Q methodology study with UK beekeepers
title Motivations underpinning honeybee management practices: A Q methodology study with UK beekeepers
title_full Motivations underpinning honeybee management practices: A Q methodology study with UK beekeepers
title_fullStr Motivations underpinning honeybee management practices: A Q methodology study with UK beekeepers
title_full_unstemmed Motivations underpinning honeybee management practices: A Q methodology study with UK beekeepers
title_short Motivations underpinning honeybee management practices: A Q methodology study with UK beekeepers
title_sort motivations underpinning honeybee management practices: a q methodology study with uk beekeepers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9378798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35588040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01736-w
work_keys_str_mv AT kahanefay motivationsunderpinninghoneybeemanagementpracticesaqmethodologystudywithukbeekeepers
AT osbornejuliet motivationsunderpinninghoneybeemanagementpracticesaqmethodologystudywithukbeekeepers
AT crowleysarah motivationsunderpinninghoneybeemanagementpracticesaqmethodologystudywithukbeekeepers
AT shawrosalind motivationsunderpinninghoneybeemanagementpracticesaqmethodologystudywithukbeekeepers