Cargando…

Patient Toward Physician Occupational Stigma Scale: Development of the Chinese Version

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Physicians’ occupational stigma could eradicate physician-patient trust, threatening physicians’ social status and occupational reputation. Hitherto, there has been no scale obtaining good psychometric properties to assess patients’ stigma toward physicians. The present study a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Zhiguang, Chen, Hongyan, Wu, Hanwei, Zhang, Xinghai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9379113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35983020
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S375032
_version_ 1784768622142423040
author Fan, Zhiguang
Chen, Hongyan
Wu, Hanwei
Zhang, Xinghai
author_facet Fan, Zhiguang
Chen, Hongyan
Wu, Hanwei
Zhang, Xinghai
author_sort Fan, Zhiguang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Physicians’ occupational stigma could eradicate physician-patient trust, threatening physicians’ social status and occupational reputation. Hitherto, there has been no scale obtaining good psychometric properties to assess patients’ stigma toward physicians. The present study aimed to develop the Patient toward Physician Occupational Stigma Scale (PPOSS) and examine its reliability and validity. METHODS: The questionnaire comprising sociodemographic information and the PPOSS were employed to survey 645 Chinese patients in two phases. In Sample 2, the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale (WFOTS), the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-12 (IUS-12), and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) were tested. RESULTS: The PPOSS includes 19 items subsumed into three dimensions of stereotype, discrimination, and prejudice. According to the results of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the three-factor model fitted well (χ(2)/df=2.065, RMSEA=0.057, SRMR=0.045, RFI=0.904, CFI=0.956, IFI=0.956, PNFI=0.779, PCFI=0.811). The PPOSS was significantly negatively correlated with the WFOTS, and significantly positively correlated with the IUS-12 and the BIPQ. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the total scale and each dimension were between 0.87 and 0.94, and the split-half reliability coefficients were between 0.84 and 0.93. Besides, the PPOSS had the measurement invariance across gender. CONCLUSION: With its satisfactory psychometric properties, the PPOSS can be used as an effective instrument to assess patients’ stigma toward physicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9379113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93791132022-08-17 Patient Toward Physician Occupational Stigma Scale: Development of the Chinese Version Fan, Zhiguang Chen, Hongyan Wu, Hanwei Zhang, Xinghai Psychol Res Behav Manag Original Research BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Physicians’ occupational stigma could eradicate physician-patient trust, threatening physicians’ social status and occupational reputation. Hitherto, there has been no scale obtaining good psychometric properties to assess patients’ stigma toward physicians. The present study aimed to develop the Patient toward Physician Occupational Stigma Scale (PPOSS) and examine its reliability and validity. METHODS: The questionnaire comprising sociodemographic information and the PPOSS were employed to survey 645 Chinese patients in two phases. In Sample 2, the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale (WFOTS), the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-12 (IUS-12), and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) were tested. RESULTS: The PPOSS includes 19 items subsumed into three dimensions of stereotype, discrimination, and prejudice. According to the results of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the three-factor model fitted well (χ(2)/df=2.065, RMSEA=0.057, SRMR=0.045, RFI=0.904, CFI=0.956, IFI=0.956, PNFI=0.779, PCFI=0.811). The PPOSS was significantly negatively correlated with the WFOTS, and significantly positively correlated with the IUS-12 and the BIPQ. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the total scale and each dimension were between 0.87 and 0.94, and the split-half reliability coefficients were between 0.84 and 0.93. Besides, the PPOSS had the measurement invariance across gender. CONCLUSION: With its satisfactory psychometric properties, the PPOSS can be used as an effective instrument to assess patients’ stigma toward physicians. Dove 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9379113/ /pubmed/35983020 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S375032 Text en © 2022 Fan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Fan, Zhiguang
Chen, Hongyan
Wu, Hanwei
Zhang, Xinghai
Patient Toward Physician Occupational Stigma Scale: Development of the Chinese Version
title Patient Toward Physician Occupational Stigma Scale: Development of the Chinese Version
title_full Patient Toward Physician Occupational Stigma Scale: Development of the Chinese Version
title_fullStr Patient Toward Physician Occupational Stigma Scale: Development of the Chinese Version
title_full_unstemmed Patient Toward Physician Occupational Stigma Scale: Development of the Chinese Version
title_short Patient Toward Physician Occupational Stigma Scale: Development of the Chinese Version
title_sort patient toward physician occupational stigma scale: development of the chinese version
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9379113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35983020
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S375032
work_keys_str_mv AT fanzhiguang patienttowardphysicianoccupationalstigmascaledevelopmentofthechineseversion
AT chenhongyan patienttowardphysicianoccupationalstigmascaledevelopmentofthechineseversion
AT wuhanwei patienttowardphysicianoccupationalstigmascaledevelopmentofthechineseversion
AT zhangxinghai patienttowardphysicianoccupationalstigmascaledevelopmentofthechineseversion