Cargando…
Animal Models of Choroidal Neovascularization: A Systematic Review
PURPOSE: Animal models of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) are extensively used to characterize the pathophysiology of chorioretinal diseases with CNV formation and to evaluate novel treatment strategies. This systematic review aims to give a detailed overview of contemporary animal models of CNV....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9379329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35943733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.63.9.11 |
_version_ | 1784768656270426112 |
---|---|
author | Fabian-Jessing, Bjørn K. Jakobsen, Thomas Stax Jensen, Emilie Grarup Alsing, Sidsel Hansen, Silja Aagaard, Lars Askou, Anne Louise Bek, Toke Corydon, Thomas J. |
author_facet | Fabian-Jessing, Bjørn K. Jakobsen, Thomas Stax Jensen, Emilie Grarup Alsing, Sidsel Hansen, Silja Aagaard, Lars Askou, Anne Louise Bek, Toke Corydon, Thomas J. |
author_sort | Fabian-Jessing, Bjørn K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Animal models of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) are extensively used to characterize the pathophysiology of chorioretinal diseases with CNV formation and to evaluate novel treatment strategies. This systematic review aims to give a detailed overview of contemporary animal models of CNV. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE from November 20, 2015, to November 20, 2020, for mammalian animal models of CNV. Following inclusion by two investigators, data from the articles were extracted according to a predefined protocol. RESULTS: A total of 380 full articles, representing 409 independent animal models, were included. Mice were by far the most utilized animal (76%) followed by rats and non-human primates. The median age of rodents was 8 weeks but with a wide range. Male animals were used in 44% of the studies, but 32% did not report the sex. CNV was laser induced in 89% of the studies, but only 44% of these reported sufficiently on standard laser parameters. Surprisingly, 28% of the studies did not report a sample size for quantitative CNV evaluation. Less than half of the studies performed quantitative in vivo evaluation, and 73% evaluated CNV quantitatively ex vivo. Both in vivo and ex vivo evaluations were conducted primarily at day 7 and/or day 14. CONCLUSIONS: The laser-induced mouse model is the predominant model for experimental CNV. The widespread use of young, healthy male animals may complicate clinical translation, and inadequate reporting challenges reproducibility. Definition and implementation of standardized methodologic and reporting guidelines are attractive. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9379329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93793292022-08-17 Animal Models of Choroidal Neovascularization: A Systematic Review Fabian-Jessing, Bjørn K. Jakobsen, Thomas Stax Jensen, Emilie Grarup Alsing, Sidsel Hansen, Silja Aagaard, Lars Askou, Anne Louise Bek, Toke Corydon, Thomas J. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Review PURPOSE: Animal models of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) are extensively used to characterize the pathophysiology of chorioretinal diseases with CNV formation and to evaluate novel treatment strategies. This systematic review aims to give a detailed overview of contemporary animal models of CNV. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE from November 20, 2015, to November 20, 2020, for mammalian animal models of CNV. Following inclusion by two investigators, data from the articles were extracted according to a predefined protocol. RESULTS: A total of 380 full articles, representing 409 independent animal models, were included. Mice were by far the most utilized animal (76%) followed by rats and non-human primates. The median age of rodents was 8 weeks but with a wide range. Male animals were used in 44% of the studies, but 32% did not report the sex. CNV was laser induced in 89% of the studies, but only 44% of these reported sufficiently on standard laser parameters. Surprisingly, 28% of the studies did not report a sample size for quantitative CNV evaluation. Less than half of the studies performed quantitative in vivo evaluation, and 73% evaluated CNV quantitatively ex vivo. Both in vivo and ex vivo evaluations were conducted primarily at day 7 and/or day 14. CONCLUSIONS: The laser-induced mouse model is the predominant model for experimental CNV. The widespread use of young, healthy male animals may complicate clinical translation, and inadequate reporting challenges reproducibility. Definition and implementation of standardized methodologic and reporting guidelines are attractive. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9379329/ /pubmed/35943733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.63.9.11 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Review Fabian-Jessing, Bjørn K. Jakobsen, Thomas Stax Jensen, Emilie Grarup Alsing, Sidsel Hansen, Silja Aagaard, Lars Askou, Anne Louise Bek, Toke Corydon, Thomas J. Animal Models of Choroidal Neovascularization: A Systematic Review |
title | Animal Models of Choroidal Neovascularization: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Animal Models of Choroidal Neovascularization: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Animal Models of Choroidal Neovascularization: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Animal Models of Choroidal Neovascularization: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Animal Models of Choroidal Neovascularization: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | animal models of choroidal neovascularization: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9379329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35943733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.63.9.11 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fabianjessingbjørnk animalmodelsofchoroidalneovascularizationasystematicreview AT jakobsenthomasstax animalmodelsofchoroidalneovascularizationasystematicreview AT jensenemiliegrarup animalmodelsofchoroidalneovascularizationasystematicreview AT alsingsidsel animalmodelsofchoroidalneovascularizationasystematicreview AT hansensilja animalmodelsofchoroidalneovascularizationasystematicreview AT aagaardlars animalmodelsofchoroidalneovascularizationasystematicreview AT askouannelouise animalmodelsofchoroidalneovascularizationasystematicreview AT bektoke animalmodelsofchoroidalneovascularizationasystematicreview AT corydonthomasj animalmodelsofchoroidalneovascularizationasystematicreview |