Cargando…

Improving Our Risk Communication: Standardized Risk Levels for Brief Assessment of Recidivism Risk-2002R

A Five-Level Risk and Needs system has been proposed as a common language for standardizing the meaning of risk levels across risk/need tools used in corrections. Study 1 examined whether the Five-Levels could be applied to BARR-2002R (N = 2,390), an actuarial tool for general recidivism. Study 2 ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blais, Julie, Babchishin, Kelly M., Hanson, R. Karl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9379389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34670458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10790632211047185
_version_ 1784768669235019776
author Blais, Julie
Babchishin, Kelly M.
Hanson, R. Karl
author_facet Blais, Julie
Babchishin, Kelly M.
Hanson, R. Karl
author_sort Blais, Julie
collection PubMed
description A Five-Level Risk and Needs system has been proposed as a common language for standardizing the meaning of risk levels across risk/need tools used in corrections. Study 1 examined whether the Five-Levels could be applied to BARR-2002R (N = 2,390), an actuarial tool for general recidivism. Study 2 examined the construct validity of BARR-2002R risk levels in two samples of individuals with a history of sexual offending (N = 1,081). Study 1 found reasonable correspondence between BARR-2002R scores and four of the five standardized risk levels (no Level V). Study 2 found that the profiles of individuals in Levels II, III, and IV were mostly consistent with expectations; however, individuals in the lowest risk level (Level I) had more criminogenic needs than expected based on the original descriptions of the Five-Levels. The Five-Level system was mostly successful when applied to BARR-2002R. Revisions to this system, or the inclusion of putatively dynamic risk factors and protective factors, may be required to improve alignment with the information provided by certain risk tools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9379389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93793892022-08-17 Improving Our Risk Communication: Standardized Risk Levels for Brief Assessment of Recidivism Risk-2002R Blais, Julie Babchishin, Kelly M. Hanson, R. Karl Sex Abuse Articles A Five-Level Risk and Needs system has been proposed as a common language for standardizing the meaning of risk levels across risk/need tools used in corrections. Study 1 examined whether the Five-Levels could be applied to BARR-2002R (N = 2,390), an actuarial tool for general recidivism. Study 2 examined the construct validity of BARR-2002R risk levels in two samples of individuals with a history of sexual offending (N = 1,081). Study 1 found reasonable correspondence between BARR-2002R scores and four of the five standardized risk levels (no Level V). Study 2 found that the profiles of individuals in Levels II, III, and IV were mostly consistent with expectations; however, individuals in the lowest risk level (Level I) had more criminogenic needs than expected based on the original descriptions of the Five-Levels. The Five-Level system was mostly successful when applied to BARR-2002R. Revisions to this system, or the inclusion of putatively dynamic risk factors and protective factors, may be required to improve alignment with the information provided by certain risk tools. SAGE Publications 2021-10-20 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9379389/ /pubmed/34670458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10790632211047185 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Blais, Julie
Babchishin, Kelly M.
Hanson, R. Karl
Improving Our Risk Communication: Standardized Risk Levels for Brief Assessment of Recidivism Risk-2002R
title Improving Our Risk Communication: Standardized Risk Levels for Brief Assessment of Recidivism Risk-2002R
title_full Improving Our Risk Communication: Standardized Risk Levels for Brief Assessment of Recidivism Risk-2002R
title_fullStr Improving Our Risk Communication: Standardized Risk Levels for Brief Assessment of Recidivism Risk-2002R
title_full_unstemmed Improving Our Risk Communication: Standardized Risk Levels for Brief Assessment of Recidivism Risk-2002R
title_short Improving Our Risk Communication: Standardized Risk Levels for Brief Assessment of Recidivism Risk-2002R
title_sort improving our risk communication: standardized risk levels for brief assessment of recidivism risk-2002r
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9379389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34670458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10790632211047185
work_keys_str_mv AT blaisjulie improvingourriskcommunicationstandardizedrisklevelsforbriefassessmentofrecidivismrisk2002r
AT babchishinkellym improvingourriskcommunicationstandardizedrisklevelsforbriefassessmentofrecidivismrisk2002r
AT hansonrkarl improvingourriskcommunicationstandardizedrisklevelsforbriefassessmentofrecidivismrisk2002r