Cargando…
Improving Our Risk Communication: Standardized Risk Levels for Brief Assessment of Recidivism Risk-2002R
A Five-Level Risk and Needs system has been proposed as a common language for standardizing the meaning of risk levels across risk/need tools used in corrections. Study 1 examined whether the Five-Levels could be applied to BARR-2002R (N = 2,390), an actuarial tool for general recidivism. Study 2 ex...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9379389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34670458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10790632211047185 |
_version_ | 1784768669235019776 |
---|---|
author | Blais, Julie Babchishin, Kelly M. Hanson, R. Karl |
author_facet | Blais, Julie Babchishin, Kelly M. Hanson, R. Karl |
author_sort | Blais, Julie |
collection | PubMed |
description | A Five-Level Risk and Needs system has been proposed as a common language for standardizing the meaning of risk levels across risk/need tools used in corrections. Study 1 examined whether the Five-Levels could be applied to BARR-2002R (N = 2,390), an actuarial tool for general recidivism. Study 2 examined the construct validity of BARR-2002R risk levels in two samples of individuals with a history of sexual offending (N = 1,081). Study 1 found reasonable correspondence between BARR-2002R scores and four of the five standardized risk levels (no Level V). Study 2 found that the profiles of individuals in Levels II, III, and IV were mostly consistent with expectations; however, individuals in the lowest risk level (Level I) had more criminogenic needs than expected based on the original descriptions of the Five-Levels. The Five-Level system was mostly successful when applied to BARR-2002R. Revisions to this system, or the inclusion of putatively dynamic risk factors and protective factors, may be required to improve alignment with the information provided by certain risk tools. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9379389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93793892022-08-17 Improving Our Risk Communication: Standardized Risk Levels for Brief Assessment of Recidivism Risk-2002R Blais, Julie Babchishin, Kelly M. Hanson, R. Karl Sex Abuse Articles A Five-Level Risk and Needs system has been proposed as a common language for standardizing the meaning of risk levels across risk/need tools used in corrections. Study 1 examined whether the Five-Levels could be applied to BARR-2002R (N = 2,390), an actuarial tool for general recidivism. Study 2 examined the construct validity of BARR-2002R risk levels in two samples of individuals with a history of sexual offending (N = 1,081). Study 1 found reasonable correspondence between BARR-2002R scores and four of the five standardized risk levels (no Level V). Study 2 found that the profiles of individuals in Levels II, III, and IV were mostly consistent with expectations; however, individuals in the lowest risk level (Level I) had more criminogenic needs than expected based on the original descriptions of the Five-Levels. The Five-Level system was mostly successful when applied to BARR-2002R. Revisions to this system, or the inclusion of putatively dynamic risk factors and protective factors, may be required to improve alignment with the information provided by certain risk tools. SAGE Publications 2021-10-20 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9379389/ /pubmed/34670458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10790632211047185 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Blais, Julie Babchishin, Kelly M. Hanson, R. Karl Improving Our Risk Communication: Standardized Risk Levels for Brief Assessment of Recidivism Risk-2002R |
title | Improving Our Risk Communication: Standardized Risk Levels for Brief
Assessment of Recidivism Risk-2002R |
title_full | Improving Our Risk Communication: Standardized Risk Levels for Brief
Assessment of Recidivism Risk-2002R |
title_fullStr | Improving Our Risk Communication: Standardized Risk Levels for Brief
Assessment of Recidivism Risk-2002R |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving Our Risk Communication: Standardized Risk Levels for Brief
Assessment of Recidivism Risk-2002R |
title_short | Improving Our Risk Communication: Standardized Risk Levels for Brief
Assessment of Recidivism Risk-2002R |
title_sort | improving our risk communication: standardized risk levels for brief
assessment of recidivism risk-2002r |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9379389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34670458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10790632211047185 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blaisjulie improvingourriskcommunicationstandardizedrisklevelsforbriefassessmentofrecidivismrisk2002r AT babchishinkellym improvingourriskcommunicationstandardizedrisklevelsforbriefassessmentofrecidivismrisk2002r AT hansonrkarl improvingourriskcommunicationstandardizedrisklevelsforbriefassessmentofrecidivismrisk2002r |