Cargando…
Impact of secondary and tertiary neonatal interventions on neonatal mortality in a low- resource limited setting hospital in Uganda: a retrospective study
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of secondary and tertiary level neonatal interventions on neonatal mortality over a period of 11 years. DESIGN: Interrupted time series analysis. SETTING: Nsambya Hospital, Uganda. INTERVENTIONS: Neonatal secondary interventions (phase I, 2007–2014) and tertiary level...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9379481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055698 |
_version_ | 1784768685664108544 |
---|---|
author | Kirabira, Victoria Nakibuuka Nakaggwa, Florence Nazziwa, Ritah Nalunga, Sanyu Nasiima, Ritah Nyagabyaki, Catherine Sebunya, Robert Latigi, Grace Pirio, Patricia Ahmadzai, Malalay Ojom, Lawrence Nabwami, Immaculate Burgoine, Kathy Blencowe, Hannah |
author_facet | Kirabira, Victoria Nakibuuka Nakaggwa, Florence Nazziwa, Ritah Nalunga, Sanyu Nasiima, Ritah Nyagabyaki, Catherine Sebunya, Robert Latigi, Grace Pirio, Patricia Ahmadzai, Malalay Ojom, Lawrence Nabwami, Immaculate Burgoine, Kathy Blencowe, Hannah |
author_sort | Kirabira, Victoria Nakibuuka |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of secondary and tertiary level neonatal interventions on neonatal mortality over a period of 11 years. DESIGN: Interrupted time series analysis. SETTING: Nsambya Hospital, Uganda. INTERVENTIONS: Neonatal secondary interventions (phase I, 2007–2014) and tertiary level interventions (phase II, 2015–2020). PARTICIPANTS: Neonates. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: neonatal mortality. Secondary outcome: case fatality rate (CFR) for prematurity, neonatal sepsis and asphyxia. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 25 316 neonates were admitted, of which 1853 (7.3%) died. The average inpatient mortality reduced from 8.2% during phase I to 5.7% during phase II (p=0.001). The CFR for prematurity reduced from 16.2% to 9.2% (p=0.001). There was a trend in reduction for the CFR of perinatal asphyxia from 14.9% to 13.0% (p=0.34). The CFR for sepsis had a more than a twofold increase (3%–6.8% p=0.001) between phase I and phase II. CONCLUSION: Implementation of secondary and tertiary neonatal care in resource-limited settings is feasible. This study shows that these interventions can significantly reduce the neonatal mortality, with the largest impact seen in the reduction of deaths from perinatal asphyxia and prematurity. An increase in sepsis related deaths was observed, suggesting emphasis on infection control is key. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9379481 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93794812022-08-30 Impact of secondary and tertiary neonatal interventions on neonatal mortality in a low- resource limited setting hospital in Uganda: a retrospective study Kirabira, Victoria Nakibuuka Nakaggwa, Florence Nazziwa, Ritah Nalunga, Sanyu Nasiima, Ritah Nyagabyaki, Catherine Sebunya, Robert Latigi, Grace Pirio, Patricia Ahmadzai, Malalay Ojom, Lawrence Nabwami, Immaculate Burgoine, Kathy Blencowe, Hannah BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of secondary and tertiary level neonatal interventions on neonatal mortality over a period of 11 years. DESIGN: Interrupted time series analysis. SETTING: Nsambya Hospital, Uganda. INTERVENTIONS: Neonatal secondary interventions (phase I, 2007–2014) and tertiary level interventions (phase II, 2015–2020). PARTICIPANTS: Neonates. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: neonatal mortality. Secondary outcome: case fatality rate (CFR) for prematurity, neonatal sepsis and asphyxia. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 25 316 neonates were admitted, of which 1853 (7.3%) died. The average inpatient mortality reduced from 8.2% during phase I to 5.7% during phase II (p=0.001). The CFR for prematurity reduced from 16.2% to 9.2% (p=0.001). There was a trend in reduction for the CFR of perinatal asphyxia from 14.9% to 13.0% (p=0.34). The CFR for sepsis had a more than a twofold increase (3%–6.8% p=0.001) between phase I and phase II. CONCLUSION: Implementation of secondary and tertiary neonatal care in resource-limited settings is feasible. This study shows that these interventions can significantly reduce the neonatal mortality, with the largest impact seen in the reduction of deaths from perinatal asphyxia and prematurity. An increase in sepsis related deaths was observed, suggesting emphasis on infection control is key. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9379481/ /pubmed/35953254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055698 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Evidence Based Practice Kirabira, Victoria Nakibuuka Nakaggwa, Florence Nazziwa, Ritah Nalunga, Sanyu Nasiima, Ritah Nyagabyaki, Catherine Sebunya, Robert Latigi, Grace Pirio, Patricia Ahmadzai, Malalay Ojom, Lawrence Nabwami, Immaculate Burgoine, Kathy Blencowe, Hannah Impact of secondary and tertiary neonatal interventions on neonatal mortality in a low- resource limited setting hospital in Uganda: a retrospective study |
title | Impact of secondary and tertiary neonatal interventions on neonatal mortality in a low- resource limited setting hospital in Uganda: a retrospective study |
title_full | Impact of secondary and tertiary neonatal interventions on neonatal mortality in a low- resource limited setting hospital in Uganda: a retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Impact of secondary and tertiary neonatal interventions on neonatal mortality in a low- resource limited setting hospital in Uganda: a retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of secondary and tertiary neonatal interventions on neonatal mortality in a low- resource limited setting hospital in Uganda: a retrospective study |
title_short | Impact of secondary and tertiary neonatal interventions on neonatal mortality in a low- resource limited setting hospital in Uganda: a retrospective study |
title_sort | impact of secondary and tertiary neonatal interventions on neonatal mortality in a low- resource limited setting hospital in uganda: a retrospective study |
topic | Evidence Based Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9379481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055698 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kirabiravictorianakibuuka impactofsecondaryandtertiaryneonatalinterventionsonneonatalmortalityinalowresourcelimitedsettinghospitalinugandaaretrospectivestudy AT nakaggwaflorence impactofsecondaryandtertiaryneonatalinterventionsonneonatalmortalityinalowresourcelimitedsettinghospitalinugandaaretrospectivestudy AT nazziwaritah impactofsecondaryandtertiaryneonatalinterventionsonneonatalmortalityinalowresourcelimitedsettinghospitalinugandaaretrospectivestudy AT nalungasanyu impactofsecondaryandtertiaryneonatalinterventionsonneonatalmortalityinalowresourcelimitedsettinghospitalinugandaaretrospectivestudy AT nasiimaritah impactofsecondaryandtertiaryneonatalinterventionsonneonatalmortalityinalowresourcelimitedsettinghospitalinugandaaretrospectivestudy AT nyagabyakicatherine impactofsecondaryandtertiaryneonatalinterventionsonneonatalmortalityinalowresourcelimitedsettinghospitalinugandaaretrospectivestudy AT sebunyarobert impactofsecondaryandtertiaryneonatalinterventionsonneonatalmortalityinalowresourcelimitedsettinghospitalinugandaaretrospectivestudy AT latigigrace impactofsecondaryandtertiaryneonatalinterventionsonneonatalmortalityinalowresourcelimitedsettinghospitalinugandaaretrospectivestudy AT piriopatricia impactofsecondaryandtertiaryneonatalinterventionsonneonatalmortalityinalowresourcelimitedsettinghospitalinugandaaretrospectivestudy AT ahmadzaimalalay impactofsecondaryandtertiaryneonatalinterventionsonneonatalmortalityinalowresourcelimitedsettinghospitalinugandaaretrospectivestudy AT ojomlawrence impactofsecondaryandtertiaryneonatalinterventionsonneonatalmortalityinalowresourcelimitedsettinghospitalinugandaaretrospectivestudy AT nabwamiimmaculate impactofsecondaryandtertiaryneonatalinterventionsonneonatalmortalityinalowresourcelimitedsettinghospitalinugandaaretrospectivestudy AT burgoinekathy impactofsecondaryandtertiaryneonatalinterventionsonneonatalmortalityinalowresourcelimitedsettinghospitalinugandaaretrospectivestudy AT blencowehannah impactofsecondaryandtertiaryneonatalinterventionsonneonatalmortalityinalowresourcelimitedsettinghospitalinugandaaretrospectivestudy |