Cargando…
Clinical Outcomes Following Simple or Complex Stenting for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Stent placement remains a challenge for coronary bifurcation lesions. While both simple and complex stenting strategies are available, it is unclear which one results in better clinical outcomes. This meta-analysis aims to explore the long-term prognosis following treatment with the 2 st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9379967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35982991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795468221116842 |
_version_ | 1784768781760856064 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Qun Huan, Hengshan Han, Yu Liu, Han Sun, Shukun Wang, Bailu Wei, Shujian |
author_facet | Zhang, Qun Huan, Hengshan Han, Yu Liu, Han Sun, Shukun Wang, Bailu Wei, Shujian |
author_sort | Zhang, Qun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stent placement remains a challenge for coronary bifurcation lesions. While both simple and complex stenting strategies are available, it is unclear which one results in better clinical outcomes. This meta-analysis aims to explore the long-term prognosis following treatment with the 2 stenting strategies. METHOD: Randomized controlled trials found from searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were included in this meta-analysis. The complex stent placement strategy was identified as the control group, and the simple stent placement strategy was identified as the experimental group. Data were synthesized with a random effects model. The quality of the randomized controlled trials was assessed by Jadad scale scores. The clinical endpoints at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 11 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2494 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The odds ratio [OR] of the major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 6 months was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-1.35; P = .49, I(2) = 0%). The OR of the MACEs at 1 year was 0.61 (95% CI 0.36-1.05; P = .08, I(2) = 0%). The OR of the MACEs at 5 years was 0.69 (95% CI 0.51-0.92; P = .01, I(2) = 0%). Compared with the complex strategy, the simple strategy was associated with a lower incidence of MACEs at 5 years. CONCLUSION: Compared to the complex stenting strategy, the simple stenting strategy can better reduce the occurrence of long-term MACEs for coronary bifurcation lesions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9379967 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93799672022-08-17 Clinical Outcomes Following Simple or Complex Stenting for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Meta-Analysis Zhang, Qun Huan, Hengshan Han, Yu Liu, Han Sun, Shukun Wang, Bailu Wei, Shujian Clin Med Insights Cardiol Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Stent placement remains a challenge for coronary bifurcation lesions. While both simple and complex stenting strategies are available, it is unclear which one results in better clinical outcomes. This meta-analysis aims to explore the long-term prognosis following treatment with the 2 stenting strategies. METHOD: Randomized controlled trials found from searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were included in this meta-analysis. The complex stent placement strategy was identified as the control group, and the simple stent placement strategy was identified as the experimental group. Data were synthesized with a random effects model. The quality of the randomized controlled trials was assessed by Jadad scale scores. The clinical endpoints at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 11 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2494 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The odds ratio [OR] of the major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 6 months was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-1.35; P = .49, I(2) = 0%). The OR of the MACEs at 1 year was 0.61 (95% CI 0.36-1.05; P = .08, I(2) = 0%). The OR of the MACEs at 5 years was 0.69 (95% CI 0.51-0.92; P = .01, I(2) = 0%). Compared with the complex strategy, the simple strategy was associated with a lower incidence of MACEs at 5 years. CONCLUSION: Compared to the complex stenting strategy, the simple stenting strategy can better reduce the occurrence of long-term MACEs for coronary bifurcation lesions. SAGE Publications 2022-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9379967/ /pubmed/35982991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795468221116842 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Zhang, Qun Huan, Hengshan Han, Yu Liu, Han Sun, Shukun Wang, Bailu Wei, Shujian Clinical Outcomes Following Simple or Complex Stenting for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Clinical Outcomes Following Simple or Complex Stenting for Coronary
Bifurcation Lesions: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Clinical Outcomes Following Simple or Complex Stenting for Coronary
Bifurcation Lesions: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Clinical Outcomes Following Simple or Complex Stenting for Coronary
Bifurcation Lesions: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Outcomes Following Simple or Complex Stenting for Coronary
Bifurcation Lesions: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Clinical Outcomes Following Simple or Complex Stenting for Coronary
Bifurcation Lesions: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | clinical outcomes following simple or complex stenting for coronary
bifurcation lesions: a meta-analysis |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9379967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35982991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795468221116842 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangqun clinicaloutcomesfollowingsimpleorcomplexstentingforcoronarybifurcationlesionsametaanalysis AT huanhengshan clinicaloutcomesfollowingsimpleorcomplexstentingforcoronarybifurcationlesionsametaanalysis AT hanyu clinicaloutcomesfollowingsimpleorcomplexstentingforcoronarybifurcationlesionsametaanalysis AT liuhan clinicaloutcomesfollowingsimpleorcomplexstentingforcoronarybifurcationlesionsametaanalysis AT sunshukun clinicaloutcomesfollowingsimpleorcomplexstentingforcoronarybifurcationlesionsametaanalysis AT wangbailu clinicaloutcomesfollowingsimpleorcomplexstentingforcoronarybifurcationlesionsametaanalysis AT weishujian clinicaloutcomesfollowingsimpleorcomplexstentingforcoronarybifurcationlesionsametaanalysis |