Cargando…

Efficacy and moderators of cognitive therapy versus behavioural activation for adults with depression: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data

BACKGROUND: Cognitive therapy and behavioural activation are both widely applied and effective psychotherapies for depression, but it is unclear which works best for whom. Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis allows for examining moderators at the participant level and can provide more pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Driessen, Ellen, Cohen, Zachary D., Lorenzo-Luaces, Lorenzo, Hollon, Steven D., Richards, David A., Dobson, Keith S., Dimidjian, Sona, Delgadillo, Jaime, Vázquez, Fernando L., McNamara, Kathleen, Horan, John J., Gardner, Pauline, Oei, Tian P., Mehta, Anuj H. P., Twisk, Jos W. R., Cristea, Ioana A., Cuijpers, Pim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9379999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35946068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.560
_version_ 1784768788858667008
author Driessen, Ellen
Cohen, Zachary D.
Lorenzo-Luaces, Lorenzo
Hollon, Steven D.
Richards, David A.
Dobson, Keith S.
Dimidjian, Sona
Delgadillo, Jaime
Vázquez, Fernando L.
McNamara, Kathleen
Horan, John J.
Gardner, Pauline
Oei, Tian P.
Mehta, Anuj H. P.
Twisk, Jos W. R.
Cristea, Ioana A.
Cuijpers, Pim
author_facet Driessen, Ellen
Cohen, Zachary D.
Lorenzo-Luaces, Lorenzo
Hollon, Steven D.
Richards, David A.
Dobson, Keith S.
Dimidjian, Sona
Delgadillo, Jaime
Vázquez, Fernando L.
McNamara, Kathleen
Horan, John J.
Gardner, Pauline
Oei, Tian P.
Mehta, Anuj H. P.
Twisk, Jos W. R.
Cristea, Ioana A.
Cuijpers, Pim
author_sort Driessen, Ellen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cognitive therapy and behavioural activation are both widely applied and effective psychotherapies for depression, but it is unclear which works best for whom. Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis allows for examining moderators at the participant level and can provide more precise effect estimates than conventional meta-analysis, which is based on study-level data. AIMS: This article describes the protocol for a systematic review and IPD meta-analysis that aims to compare the efficacy of cognitive therapy and behavioural activation for adults with depression, and to explore moderators of treatment effect. (PROSPERO: CRD42022341602) METHOD: Systematic literature searches will be conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, to identify randomised clinical trials comparing cognitive therapy and behavioural activation for adult acute-phase depression. Investigators of these trials will be invited to share their participant-level data. One-stage IPD meta-analyses will be conducted with mixed-effects models to assess treatment effects and to examine various available demographic, clinical and psychological participant characteristics as potential moderators. The primary outcome measure will be depressive symptom level at treatment completion. Secondary outcomes will include post-treatment anxiety, interpersonal functioning and quality of life, as well as follow-up outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first IPD meta-analysis concerning cognitive therapy versus behavioural activation for adult depression. This study has the potential to enhance our knowledge of depression treatment by using state-of-the-art statistical techniques to compare the efficacy of two widely used psychotherapies, and by shedding more light on which of these treatments might work best for whom.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9379999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93799992022-08-26 Efficacy and moderators of cognitive therapy versus behavioural activation for adults with depression: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data Driessen, Ellen Cohen, Zachary D. Lorenzo-Luaces, Lorenzo Hollon, Steven D. Richards, David A. Dobson, Keith S. Dimidjian, Sona Delgadillo, Jaime Vázquez, Fernando L. McNamara, Kathleen Horan, John J. Gardner, Pauline Oei, Tian P. Mehta, Anuj H. P. Twisk, Jos W. R. Cristea, Ioana A. Cuijpers, Pim BJPsych Open Papers BACKGROUND: Cognitive therapy and behavioural activation are both widely applied and effective psychotherapies for depression, but it is unclear which works best for whom. Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis allows for examining moderators at the participant level and can provide more precise effect estimates than conventional meta-analysis, which is based on study-level data. AIMS: This article describes the protocol for a systematic review and IPD meta-analysis that aims to compare the efficacy of cognitive therapy and behavioural activation for adults with depression, and to explore moderators of treatment effect. (PROSPERO: CRD42022341602) METHOD: Systematic literature searches will be conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, to identify randomised clinical trials comparing cognitive therapy and behavioural activation for adult acute-phase depression. Investigators of these trials will be invited to share their participant-level data. One-stage IPD meta-analyses will be conducted with mixed-effects models to assess treatment effects and to examine various available demographic, clinical and psychological participant characteristics as potential moderators. The primary outcome measure will be depressive symptom level at treatment completion. Secondary outcomes will include post-treatment anxiety, interpersonal functioning and quality of life, as well as follow-up outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first IPD meta-analysis concerning cognitive therapy versus behavioural activation for adult depression. This study has the potential to enhance our knowledge of depression treatment by using state-of-the-art statistical techniques to compare the efficacy of two widely used psychotherapies, and by shedding more light on which of these treatments might work best for whom. Cambridge University Press 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9379999/ /pubmed/35946068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.560 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Papers
Driessen, Ellen
Cohen, Zachary D.
Lorenzo-Luaces, Lorenzo
Hollon, Steven D.
Richards, David A.
Dobson, Keith S.
Dimidjian, Sona
Delgadillo, Jaime
Vázquez, Fernando L.
McNamara, Kathleen
Horan, John J.
Gardner, Pauline
Oei, Tian P.
Mehta, Anuj H. P.
Twisk, Jos W. R.
Cristea, Ioana A.
Cuijpers, Pim
Efficacy and moderators of cognitive therapy versus behavioural activation for adults with depression: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data
title Efficacy and moderators of cognitive therapy versus behavioural activation for adults with depression: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data
title_full Efficacy and moderators of cognitive therapy versus behavioural activation for adults with depression: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data
title_fullStr Efficacy and moderators of cognitive therapy versus behavioural activation for adults with depression: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and moderators of cognitive therapy versus behavioural activation for adults with depression: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data
title_short Efficacy and moderators of cognitive therapy versus behavioural activation for adults with depression: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data
title_sort efficacy and moderators of cognitive therapy versus behavioural activation for adults with depression: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data
topic Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9379999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35946068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.560
work_keys_str_mv AT driessenellen efficacyandmoderatorsofcognitivetherapyversusbehaviouralactivationforadultswithdepressionstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT cohenzacharyd efficacyandmoderatorsofcognitivetherapyversusbehaviouralactivationforadultswithdepressionstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT lorenzoluaceslorenzo efficacyandmoderatorsofcognitivetherapyversusbehaviouralactivationforadultswithdepressionstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT hollonstevend efficacyandmoderatorsofcognitivetherapyversusbehaviouralactivationforadultswithdepressionstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT richardsdavida efficacyandmoderatorsofcognitivetherapyversusbehaviouralactivationforadultswithdepressionstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT dobsonkeiths efficacyandmoderatorsofcognitivetherapyversusbehaviouralactivationforadultswithdepressionstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT dimidjiansona efficacyandmoderatorsofcognitivetherapyversusbehaviouralactivationforadultswithdepressionstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT delgadillojaime efficacyandmoderatorsofcognitivetherapyversusbehaviouralactivationforadultswithdepressionstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT vazquezfernandol efficacyandmoderatorsofcognitivetherapyversusbehaviouralactivationforadultswithdepressionstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT mcnamarakathleen efficacyandmoderatorsofcognitivetherapyversusbehaviouralactivationforadultswithdepressionstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT horanjohnj efficacyandmoderatorsofcognitivetherapyversusbehaviouralactivationforadultswithdepressionstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT gardnerpauline efficacyandmoderatorsofcognitivetherapyversusbehaviouralactivationforadultswithdepressionstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT oeitianp efficacyandmoderatorsofcognitivetherapyversusbehaviouralactivationforadultswithdepressionstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT mehtaanujhp efficacyandmoderatorsofcognitivetherapyversusbehaviouralactivationforadultswithdepressionstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT twiskjoswr efficacyandmoderatorsofcognitivetherapyversusbehaviouralactivationforadultswithdepressionstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT cristeaioanaa efficacyandmoderatorsofcognitivetherapyversusbehaviouralactivationforadultswithdepressionstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT cuijperspim efficacyandmoderatorsofcognitivetherapyversusbehaviouralactivationforadultswithdepressionstudyprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata