Cargando…
Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-T in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literature
OBJECTIVE: To promote advanced research using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of and screening for osteoporosis by looking for correlations among the T-scores measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on diffusion-weighted...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9380604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35983340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2021.0124 |
_version_ | 1784768913954832384 |
---|---|
author | Trentadue, Mirko Sozzi, Carlo Idolazzi, Luca Lazzarini, Gianluigi Murano, Riccardo Sante Gatti, Davide Rossini, Maurizio Piovan, Enrico |
author_facet | Trentadue, Mirko Sozzi, Carlo Idolazzi, Luca Lazzarini, Gianluigi Murano, Riccardo Sante Gatti, Davide Rossini, Maurizio Piovan, Enrico |
author_sort | Trentadue, Mirko |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To promote advanced research using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of and screening for osteoporosis by looking for correlations among the T-scores measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and the T1-weighted signal intensity values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study of postmenopausal women with no contraindications to MRI and no history of cancer who underwent DEXA within 30 days before or after the MRI examination. A 3.0-T scanner was used in order to acquire sagittal sequences targeting the lumbar spine. RESULTS: Thirteen women underwent DEXA and MRI. In two cases, the MRI was discontinued early. Therefore, the final sample comprised 11 patients. The ADC values and T1-weighted signal intensity were found to be higher in patients with osteoporosis. However, among the patients > 60 years of age with osteoporosis, ADC values were lower and T1-weighted signal intensity was even higher. CONCLUSION: It is unlikely that MRI will soon replace DEXA for the diagnostic workup of osteoporosis. Although DWI and ADC mapping are useful for understanding the pathophysiology of osteoporosis, we believe that T1-weighted sequences are more sensitive than is DWI as a means of performing a qualitative analysis of vertebral alterations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9380604 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93806042022-08-17 Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-T in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literature Trentadue, Mirko Sozzi, Carlo Idolazzi, Luca Lazzarini, Gianluigi Murano, Riccardo Sante Gatti, Davide Rossini, Maurizio Piovan, Enrico Radiol Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: To promote advanced research using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of and screening for osteoporosis by looking for correlations among the T-scores measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and the T1-weighted signal intensity values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study of postmenopausal women with no contraindications to MRI and no history of cancer who underwent DEXA within 30 days before or after the MRI examination. A 3.0-T scanner was used in order to acquire sagittal sequences targeting the lumbar spine. RESULTS: Thirteen women underwent DEXA and MRI. In two cases, the MRI was discontinued early. Therefore, the final sample comprised 11 patients. The ADC values and T1-weighted signal intensity were found to be higher in patients with osteoporosis. However, among the patients > 60 years of age with osteoporosis, ADC values were lower and T1-weighted signal intensity was even higher. CONCLUSION: It is unlikely that MRI will soon replace DEXA for the diagnostic workup of osteoporosis. Although DWI and ADC mapping are useful for understanding the pathophysiology of osteoporosis, we believe that T1-weighted sequences are more sensitive than is DWI as a means of performing a qualitative analysis of vertebral alterations. Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9380604/ /pubmed/35983340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2021.0124 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Trentadue, Mirko Sozzi, Carlo Idolazzi, Luca Lazzarini, Gianluigi Murano, Riccardo Sante Gatti, Davide Rossini, Maurizio Piovan, Enrico Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-T in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literature |
title | Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-T in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literature |
title_full | Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-T in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literature |
title_fullStr | Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-T in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-T in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literature |
title_short | Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-T in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literature |
title_sort | magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-t in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective study and review of the literature |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9380604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35983340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2021.0124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trentaduemirko magneticresonanceimagingat30tinpostmenopausalosteoporosisaprospectivestudyandreviewoftheliterature AT sozzicarlo magneticresonanceimagingat30tinpostmenopausalosteoporosisaprospectivestudyandreviewoftheliterature AT idolazziluca magneticresonanceimagingat30tinpostmenopausalosteoporosisaprospectivestudyandreviewoftheliterature AT lazzarinigianluigi magneticresonanceimagingat30tinpostmenopausalosteoporosisaprospectivestudyandreviewoftheliterature AT muranoriccardosante magneticresonanceimagingat30tinpostmenopausalosteoporosisaprospectivestudyandreviewoftheliterature AT gattidavide magneticresonanceimagingat30tinpostmenopausalosteoporosisaprospectivestudyandreviewoftheliterature AT rossinimaurizio magneticresonanceimagingat30tinpostmenopausalosteoporosisaprospectivestudyandreviewoftheliterature AT piovanenrico magneticresonanceimagingat30tinpostmenopausalosteoporosisaprospectivestudyandreviewoftheliterature |