Cargando…
A machine learning framework supporting prospective clinical decisions applied to risk prediction in oncology
We present a general framework for developing a machine learning (ML) tool that supports clinician assessment of patient risk using electronic health record-derived real-world data and apply the framework to a quality improvement use case in an oncology setting to identify patients at risk for a nea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9380664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35974092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00660-3 |
_version_ | 1784768921454247936 |
---|---|
author | Coombs, Lorinda Orlando, Abigail Wang, Xiaoliang Shaw, Pooja Rich, Alexander S. Lakhtakia, Shreyas Titchener, Karen Adamson, Blythe Miksad, Rebecca A. Mooney, Kathi |
author_facet | Coombs, Lorinda Orlando, Abigail Wang, Xiaoliang Shaw, Pooja Rich, Alexander S. Lakhtakia, Shreyas Titchener, Karen Adamson, Blythe Miksad, Rebecca A. Mooney, Kathi |
author_sort | Coombs, Lorinda |
collection | PubMed |
description | We present a general framework for developing a machine learning (ML) tool that supports clinician assessment of patient risk using electronic health record-derived real-world data and apply the framework to a quality improvement use case in an oncology setting to identify patients at risk for a near-term (60 day) emergency department (ED) visit who could potentially be eligible for a home-based acute care program. Framework steps include defining clinical quality improvement goals, model development and validation, bias assessment, retrospective and prospective validation, and deployment in clinical workflow. In the retrospective analysis for the use case, 8% of patient encounters were associated with a high risk (pre-defined as predicted probability ≥20%) for a near-term ED visit by the patient. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for future ED events was 26% and 91%, respectively. Odds ratio (OR) of ED visit (high- vs. low-risk) was 3.5 (95% CI: 3.4–3.5). The model appeared to be calibrated across racial, gender, and ethnic groups. In the prospective analysis, 10% of patients were classified as high risk, 76% of whom were confirmed by clinicians as eligible for home-based acute care. PPV and NPV for future ED events was 22% and 95%, respectively. OR of ED visit (high- vs. low-risk) was 5.4 (95% CI: 2.6–11.0). The proposed framework for an ML-based tool that supports clinician assessment of patient risk is a stepwise development approach; we successfully applied the framework to an ED visit risk prediction use case. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9380664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93806642022-08-17 A machine learning framework supporting prospective clinical decisions applied to risk prediction in oncology Coombs, Lorinda Orlando, Abigail Wang, Xiaoliang Shaw, Pooja Rich, Alexander S. Lakhtakia, Shreyas Titchener, Karen Adamson, Blythe Miksad, Rebecca A. Mooney, Kathi NPJ Digit Med Article We present a general framework for developing a machine learning (ML) tool that supports clinician assessment of patient risk using electronic health record-derived real-world data and apply the framework to a quality improvement use case in an oncology setting to identify patients at risk for a near-term (60 day) emergency department (ED) visit who could potentially be eligible for a home-based acute care program. Framework steps include defining clinical quality improvement goals, model development and validation, bias assessment, retrospective and prospective validation, and deployment in clinical workflow. In the retrospective analysis for the use case, 8% of patient encounters were associated with a high risk (pre-defined as predicted probability ≥20%) for a near-term ED visit by the patient. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for future ED events was 26% and 91%, respectively. Odds ratio (OR) of ED visit (high- vs. low-risk) was 3.5 (95% CI: 3.4–3.5). The model appeared to be calibrated across racial, gender, and ethnic groups. In the prospective analysis, 10% of patients were classified as high risk, 76% of whom were confirmed by clinicians as eligible for home-based acute care. PPV and NPV for future ED events was 22% and 95%, respectively. OR of ED visit (high- vs. low-risk) was 5.4 (95% CI: 2.6–11.0). The proposed framework for an ML-based tool that supports clinician assessment of patient risk is a stepwise development approach; we successfully applied the framework to an ED visit risk prediction use case. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9380664/ /pubmed/35974092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00660-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Coombs, Lorinda Orlando, Abigail Wang, Xiaoliang Shaw, Pooja Rich, Alexander S. Lakhtakia, Shreyas Titchener, Karen Adamson, Blythe Miksad, Rebecca A. Mooney, Kathi A machine learning framework supporting prospective clinical decisions applied to risk prediction in oncology |
title | A machine learning framework supporting prospective clinical decisions applied to risk prediction in oncology |
title_full | A machine learning framework supporting prospective clinical decisions applied to risk prediction in oncology |
title_fullStr | A machine learning framework supporting prospective clinical decisions applied to risk prediction in oncology |
title_full_unstemmed | A machine learning framework supporting prospective clinical decisions applied to risk prediction in oncology |
title_short | A machine learning framework supporting prospective clinical decisions applied to risk prediction in oncology |
title_sort | machine learning framework supporting prospective clinical decisions applied to risk prediction in oncology |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9380664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35974092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00660-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coombslorinda amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT orlandoabigail amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT wangxiaoliang amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT shawpooja amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT richalexanders amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT lakhtakiashreyas amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT titchenerkaren amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT adamsonblythe amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT miksadrebeccaa amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT mooneykathi amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT coombslorinda machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT orlandoabigail machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT wangxiaoliang machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT shawpooja machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT richalexanders machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT lakhtakiashreyas machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT titchenerkaren machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT adamsonblythe machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT miksadrebeccaa machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology AT mooneykathi machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology |