Cargando…

A machine learning framework supporting prospective clinical decisions applied to risk prediction in oncology

We present a general framework for developing a machine learning (ML) tool that supports clinician assessment of patient risk using electronic health record-derived real-world data and apply the framework to a quality improvement use case in an oncology setting to identify patients at risk for a nea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coombs, Lorinda, Orlando, Abigail, Wang, Xiaoliang, Shaw, Pooja, Rich, Alexander S., Lakhtakia, Shreyas, Titchener, Karen, Adamson, Blythe, Miksad, Rebecca A., Mooney, Kathi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9380664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35974092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00660-3
_version_ 1784768921454247936
author Coombs, Lorinda
Orlando, Abigail
Wang, Xiaoliang
Shaw, Pooja
Rich, Alexander S.
Lakhtakia, Shreyas
Titchener, Karen
Adamson, Blythe
Miksad, Rebecca A.
Mooney, Kathi
author_facet Coombs, Lorinda
Orlando, Abigail
Wang, Xiaoliang
Shaw, Pooja
Rich, Alexander S.
Lakhtakia, Shreyas
Titchener, Karen
Adamson, Blythe
Miksad, Rebecca A.
Mooney, Kathi
author_sort Coombs, Lorinda
collection PubMed
description We present a general framework for developing a machine learning (ML) tool that supports clinician assessment of patient risk using electronic health record-derived real-world data and apply the framework to a quality improvement use case in an oncology setting to identify patients at risk for a near-term (60 day) emergency department (ED) visit who could potentially be eligible for a home-based acute care program. Framework steps include defining clinical quality improvement goals, model development and validation, bias assessment, retrospective and prospective validation, and deployment in clinical workflow. In the retrospective analysis for the use case, 8% of patient encounters were associated with a high risk (pre-defined as predicted probability ≥20%) for a near-term ED visit by the patient. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for future ED events was 26% and 91%, respectively. Odds ratio (OR) of ED visit (high- vs. low-risk) was 3.5 (95% CI: 3.4–3.5). The model appeared to be calibrated across racial, gender, and ethnic groups. In the prospective analysis, 10% of patients were classified as high risk, 76% of whom were confirmed by clinicians as eligible for home-based acute care. PPV and NPV for future ED events was 22% and 95%, respectively. OR of ED visit (high- vs. low-risk) was 5.4 (95% CI: 2.6–11.0). The proposed framework for an ML-based tool that supports clinician assessment of patient risk is a stepwise development approach; we successfully applied the framework to an ED visit risk prediction use case.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9380664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93806642022-08-17 A machine learning framework supporting prospective clinical decisions applied to risk prediction in oncology Coombs, Lorinda Orlando, Abigail Wang, Xiaoliang Shaw, Pooja Rich, Alexander S. Lakhtakia, Shreyas Titchener, Karen Adamson, Blythe Miksad, Rebecca A. Mooney, Kathi NPJ Digit Med Article We present a general framework for developing a machine learning (ML) tool that supports clinician assessment of patient risk using electronic health record-derived real-world data and apply the framework to a quality improvement use case in an oncology setting to identify patients at risk for a near-term (60 day) emergency department (ED) visit who could potentially be eligible for a home-based acute care program. Framework steps include defining clinical quality improvement goals, model development and validation, bias assessment, retrospective and prospective validation, and deployment in clinical workflow. In the retrospective analysis for the use case, 8% of patient encounters were associated with a high risk (pre-defined as predicted probability ≥20%) for a near-term ED visit by the patient. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for future ED events was 26% and 91%, respectively. Odds ratio (OR) of ED visit (high- vs. low-risk) was 3.5 (95% CI: 3.4–3.5). The model appeared to be calibrated across racial, gender, and ethnic groups. In the prospective analysis, 10% of patients were classified as high risk, 76% of whom were confirmed by clinicians as eligible for home-based acute care. PPV and NPV for future ED events was 22% and 95%, respectively. OR of ED visit (high- vs. low-risk) was 5.4 (95% CI: 2.6–11.0). The proposed framework for an ML-based tool that supports clinician assessment of patient risk is a stepwise development approach; we successfully applied the framework to an ED visit risk prediction use case. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9380664/ /pubmed/35974092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00660-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Coombs, Lorinda
Orlando, Abigail
Wang, Xiaoliang
Shaw, Pooja
Rich, Alexander S.
Lakhtakia, Shreyas
Titchener, Karen
Adamson, Blythe
Miksad, Rebecca A.
Mooney, Kathi
A machine learning framework supporting prospective clinical decisions applied to risk prediction in oncology
title A machine learning framework supporting prospective clinical decisions applied to risk prediction in oncology
title_full A machine learning framework supporting prospective clinical decisions applied to risk prediction in oncology
title_fullStr A machine learning framework supporting prospective clinical decisions applied to risk prediction in oncology
title_full_unstemmed A machine learning framework supporting prospective clinical decisions applied to risk prediction in oncology
title_short A machine learning framework supporting prospective clinical decisions applied to risk prediction in oncology
title_sort machine learning framework supporting prospective clinical decisions applied to risk prediction in oncology
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9380664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35974092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00660-3
work_keys_str_mv AT coombslorinda amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT orlandoabigail amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT wangxiaoliang amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT shawpooja amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT richalexanders amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT lakhtakiashreyas amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT titchenerkaren amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT adamsonblythe amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT miksadrebeccaa amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT mooneykathi amachinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT coombslorinda machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT orlandoabigail machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT wangxiaoliang machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT shawpooja machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT richalexanders machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT lakhtakiashreyas machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT titchenerkaren machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT adamsonblythe machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT miksadrebeccaa machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology
AT mooneykathi machinelearningframeworksupportingprospectiveclinicaldecisionsappliedtoriskpredictioninoncology