Cargando…
Telehealth follow-up after cholecystectomy is safe in veterans
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought many challenges including barriers to delivering high-quality surgical care and follow-up while minimizing the risk of infection. Telehealth has been increasingly utilized for post-operative visits, yet little data exists to guide surgeons in its use. We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9380680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35974252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09501-6 |
_version_ | 1784768925608706048 |
---|---|
author | Abbitt, Danielle Choy, Kevin Castle, Rose Carmichael, Heather Jones, Teresa S. Wikiel, Krzystof J. Barnett, Carlton C. Moore, John T. Robinson, Thomas N. Jones, Edward L. |
author_facet | Abbitt, Danielle Choy, Kevin Castle, Rose Carmichael, Heather Jones, Teresa S. Wikiel, Krzystof J. Barnett, Carlton C. Moore, John T. Robinson, Thomas N. Jones, Edward L. |
author_sort | Abbitt, Danielle |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought many challenges including barriers to delivering high-quality surgical care and follow-up while minimizing the risk of infection. Telehealth has been increasingly utilized for post-operative visits, yet little data exists to guide surgeons in its use. We sought to determine safety and efficacy of telehealth follow-up in patients undergoing cholecystectomy during the global pandemic at a VA Medical Center (VAMC). METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients undergoing cholecystectomy at a level 1A VAMC over a 2-year period from August 2019 to August 2021. Baseline demographics, post-operative complications, readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits and need for additional procedures were reviewed. Patients who experienced a complication prior to discharge, underwent a concomitant procedure, had non-absorbable skin closure, had new diagnosis of malignancy or were discharged home with drain(s) were ineligible for telehealth follow-up and excluded. RESULTS: Over the study period, 179 patients underwent cholecystectomy; 30 (17%) were excluded as above. 20 (13%) missed their follow-up, 52 (35%) were seen via telehealth and 77 (52%) followed-up in person. There was no difference between the two groups regarding baseline demographics or intra-operative variables. There was no significant difference in post-operative complications [4 (8%) vs 6 (8%), p > 0.99], ED utilization [5 (10%) vs 7 (9%), p = 0.78], 30-day readmission [3 (6%) vs 6 (8%), p = 0.74] or need for additional procedures [2 (4%) vs 4 (5%), p = 0.41] between telehealth and in-person follow-up. CONCLUSION: Telehealth follow-up after cholecystectomy is safe and effective in Veterans. There were no differences in outcomes between patients that followed up in-person vs those that were seen via phone or video. Routine telehealth follow-up after uncomplicated cholecystectomy should be considered for all patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9380680 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93806802022-08-17 Telehealth follow-up after cholecystectomy is safe in veterans Abbitt, Danielle Choy, Kevin Castle, Rose Carmichael, Heather Jones, Teresa S. Wikiel, Krzystof J. Barnett, Carlton C. Moore, John T. Robinson, Thomas N. Jones, Edward L. Surg Endosc 2022 SAGES Oral BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought many challenges including barriers to delivering high-quality surgical care and follow-up while minimizing the risk of infection. Telehealth has been increasingly utilized for post-operative visits, yet little data exists to guide surgeons in its use. We sought to determine safety and efficacy of telehealth follow-up in patients undergoing cholecystectomy during the global pandemic at a VA Medical Center (VAMC). METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients undergoing cholecystectomy at a level 1A VAMC over a 2-year period from August 2019 to August 2021. Baseline demographics, post-operative complications, readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits and need for additional procedures were reviewed. Patients who experienced a complication prior to discharge, underwent a concomitant procedure, had non-absorbable skin closure, had new diagnosis of malignancy or were discharged home with drain(s) were ineligible for telehealth follow-up and excluded. RESULTS: Over the study period, 179 patients underwent cholecystectomy; 30 (17%) were excluded as above. 20 (13%) missed their follow-up, 52 (35%) were seen via telehealth and 77 (52%) followed-up in person. There was no difference between the two groups regarding baseline demographics or intra-operative variables. There was no significant difference in post-operative complications [4 (8%) vs 6 (8%), p > 0.99], ED utilization [5 (10%) vs 7 (9%), p = 0.78], 30-day readmission [3 (6%) vs 6 (8%), p = 0.74] or need for additional procedures [2 (4%) vs 4 (5%), p = 0.41] between telehealth and in-person follow-up. CONCLUSION: Telehealth follow-up after cholecystectomy is safe and effective in Veterans. There were no differences in outcomes between patients that followed up in-person vs those that were seen via phone or video. Routine telehealth follow-up after uncomplicated cholecystectomy should be considered for all patients. Springer US 2022-08-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9380680/ /pubmed/35974252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09501-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | 2022 SAGES Oral Abbitt, Danielle Choy, Kevin Castle, Rose Carmichael, Heather Jones, Teresa S. Wikiel, Krzystof J. Barnett, Carlton C. Moore, John T. Robinson, Thomas N. Jones, Edward L. Telehealth follow-up after cholecystectomy is safe in veterans |
title | Telehealth follow-up after cholecystectomy is safe in veterans |
title_full | Telehealth follow-up after cholecystectomy is safe in veterans |
title_fullStr | Telehealth follow-up after cholecystectomy is safe in veterans |
title_full_unstemmed | Telehealth follow-up after cholecystectomy is safe in veterans |
title_short | Telehealth follow-up after cholecystectomy is safe in veterans |
title_sort | telehealth follow-up after cholecystectomy is safe in veterans |
topic | 2022 SAGES Oral |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9380680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35974252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09501-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abbittdanielle telehealthfollowupaftercholecystectomyissafeinveterans AT choykevin telehealthfollowupaftercholecystectomyissafeinveterans AT castlerose telehealthfollowupaftercholecystectomyissafeinveterans AT carmichaelheather telehealthfollowupaftercholecystectomyissafeinveterans AT jonesteresas telehealthfollowupaftercholecystectomyissafeinveterans AT wikielkrzystofj telehealthfollowupaftercholecystectomyissafeinveterans AT barnettcarltonc telehealthfollowupaftercholecystectomyissafeinveterans AT moorejohnt telehealthfollowupaftercholecystectomyissafeinveterans AT robinsonthomasn telehealthfollowupaftercholecystectomyissafeinveterans AT jonesedwardl telehealthfollowupaftercholecystectomyissafeinveterans |