Cargando…
Krankenhausalarm- und -einsatzplanung in Baden-Württemberg. Eine länderspezifische Umfrage an 214 Kliniken
BACKGROUND: Due to legal regulations in Germany, public acute and emergency (A&E) hospitals—along with responsible authorities, emergency medical services, and other institutions such as the state medical associations—are committed to participate in civil protection. This participation includes...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9380686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35991807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10049-022-01065-1 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Due to legal regulations in Germany, public acute and emergency (A&E) hospitals—along with responsible authorities, emergency medical services, and other institutions such as the state medical associations—are committed to participate in civil protection. This participation includes the need to create and update emergency plans for external and internal crises and to take part in disaster drills. In fact, so far there is only little literature to prove whether and to what extent hospitals fulfill their obligations on this topic OBJECTIVES: Using a standardized survey, the state of emergency planning in hospitals in Baden-Wuerttemberg was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on a listing provided by the Hospital Society of Baden-Wuerttemberg (BWKG), all 214 hospitals in Baden-Wuerttemberg were identified. The standardized questionnaire inquired about specific characteristics of the emergency plan, the availability and knowledge of this plan by the hospital workforce and other local institutions that take part in civil protection and, finally, participation in disaster drills were queried. RESULTS: Of the 214 hospitals in Baden-Wuerttemberg, 135 (63%) provided information using the questionnaire. Except for one hospital, all other clinics indicated having a special emergency plan ready. In most cases (79.3%), both external (e.g., mass casualty incidents) and internal (e.g., fire, failure of technical equipment) crises are covered. In the vast majority of cases (94%), the hospitals also indicated that they regularly update their emergency plan, whereby the frequency of updates varied markedly. Three quarters of the hospitals said that they also regularly simulate the use of the emergency plan in disaster drills. In two thirds of the cases, external forces such as emergency medical services or the fire department also take part in these drills along with the hospitals themselves. In some cases, knowledge gained from the drills was incorporated into the emergency plan or led to improvements in staff training. CONCLUSIONS: The willingness of public hospitals to establish comprehensive disaster planning and to take part in related drills seems to have improved noticeably in recent years. However, there is still the need for improvement in keeping the concepts up to date at some hospitals. Especially smaller hospitals showed deficits in emergency planning, particularly concerning preparedness for internal crises, resulting from failure of technical equipment. More regular drills should be used to test existing concepts and to familiarize employees with the processes on a routine basis. |
---|