Cargando…

Auxiliary Screening COVID-19 by Serology

BACKGROUND: The 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic remains rampant in many countries/regions. Improving the positive detection rate of COVID-19 infection is an important measure for control and prevention of this pandemic. This meta-analysis aims to systematically summarize the current chara...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pan, Xiongfeng, Kaminga, Atipatsa C., Chen, Yuyao, Liu, Hongying, Wen, Shi Wu, Fang, Yingjing, Jia, Peng, Liu, Aizhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9380738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35983367
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.819841
_version_ 1784768936114388992
author Pan, Xiongfeng
Kaminga, Atipatsa C.
Chen, Yuyao
Liu, Hongying
Wen, Shi Wu
Fang, Yingjing
Jia, Peng
Liu, Aizhong
author_facet Pan, Xiongfeng
Kaminga, Atipatsa C.
Chen, Yuyao
Liu, Hongying
Wen, Shi Wu
Fang, Yingjing
Jia, Peng
Liu, Aizhong
author_sort Pan, Xiongfeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic remains rampant in many countries/regions. Improving the positive detection rate of COVID-19 infection is an important measure for control and prevention of this pandemic. This meta-analysis aims to systematically summarize the current characteristics of the auxiliary screening methods by serology for COVID-19 infection in real world. METHODS: Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, CNKI, and Wangfang databases were searched for relevant articles published prior to May 1(st), 2022. Data on specificity, sensitivity, positive/negative likelihood ratio, area under curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio (dOR) were calculated purposefully. RESULTS: Sixty-two studies were included with 35,775 participants in the meta-analysis. Among these studies, the pooled estimates for area under the summary receiver operator characteristic of IgG and IgM to predicting COVID-19 diagnosis were 0.974 and 0.928, respectively. The IgG dOR was 209.78 (95% CI: 106.12 to 414.67). The IgM dOR was 78.17 (95% CI: 36.76 to 166.25). CONCLUSION: Our findings support serum-specific antibody detection may be the main auxiliary screening methods for COVID-19 infection in real world.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9380738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93807382022-08-17 Auxiliary Screening COVID-19 by Serology Pan, Xiongfeng Kaminga, Atipatsa C. Chen, Yuyao Liu, Hongying Wen, Shi Wu Fang, Yingjing Jia, Peng Liu, Aizhong Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: The 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic remains rampant in many countries/regions. Improving the positive detection rate of COVID-19 infection is an important measure for control and prevention of this pandemic. This meta-analysis aims to systematically summarize the current characteristics of the auxiliary screening methods by serology for COVID-19 infection in real world. METHODS: Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, CNKI, and Wangfang databases were searched for relevant articles published prior to May 1(st), 2022. Data on specificity, sensitivity, positive/negative likelihood ratio, area under curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio (dOR) were calculated purposefully. RESULTS: Sixty-two studies were included with 35,775 participants in the meta-analysis. Among these studies, the pooled estimates for area under the summary receiver operator characteristic of IgG and IgM to predicting COVID-19 diagnosis were 0.974 and 0.928, respectively. The IgG dOR was 209.78 (95% CI: 106.12 to 414.67). The IgM dOR was 78.17 (95% CI: 36.76 to 166.25). CONCLUSION: Our findings support serum-specific antibody detection may be the main auxiliary screening methods for COVID-19 infection in real world. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9380738/ /pubmed/35983367 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.819841 Text en Copyright © 2022 Pan, Kaminga, Chen, Liu, Wen, Fang, Jia and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Pan, Xiongfeng
Kaminga, Atipatsa C.
Chen, Yuyao
Liu, Hongying
Wen, Shi Wu
Fang, Yingjing
Jia, Peng
Liu, Aizhong
Auxiliary Screening COVID-19 by Serology
title Auxiliary Screening COVID-19 by Serology
title_full Auxiliary Screening COVID-19 by Serology
title_fullStr Auxiliary Screening COVID-19 by Serology
title_full_unstemmed Auxiliary Screening COVID-19 by Serology
title_short Auxiliary Screening COVID-19 by Serology
title_sort auxiliary screening covid-19 by serology
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9380738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35983367
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.819841
work_keys_str_mv AT panxiongfeng auxiliaryscreeningcovid19byserology
AT kamingaatipatsac auxiliaryscreeningcovid19byserology
AT chenyuyao auxiliaryscreeningcovid19byserology
AT liuhongying auxiliaryscreeningcovid19byserology
AT wenshiwu auxiliaryscreeningcovid19byserology
AT fangyingjing auxiliaryscreeningcovid19byserology
AT jiapeng auxiliaryscreeningcovid19byserology
AT liuaizhong auxiliaryscreeningcovid19byserology