Cargando…

Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to the Kidneys Following Radioligand Therapy with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by Two Different Background Correction Methods

BACKGROUND: To improve the accuracy of activity image quality, scatter correction is a critical method. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy in calculation of absorbed dose to patients following radioligand therapy (RLT) with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by two different methods of background c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahmoudi, Elahe, Pirayesh, Elahe, Deevband, Mohammad Reza, Amoui, Mahasti, Rad, Mehrdad Ghorbani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9380804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35982806
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_134_21
_version_ 1784768946859147264
author Mahmoudi, Elahe
Pirayesh, Elahe
Deevband, Mohammad Reza
Amoui, Mahasti
Rad, Mehrdad Ghorbani
author_facet Mahmoudi, Elahe
Pirayesh, Elahe
Deevband, Mohammad Reza
Amoui, Mahasti
Rad, Mehrdad Ghorbani
author_sort Mahmoudi, Elahe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To improve the accuracy of activity image quality, scatter correction is a critical method. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy in calculation of absorbed dose to patients following radioligand therapy (RLT) with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by two different methods of background correction in the conjugate view method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involved 10 patients. The individualized patient dosimetry calculations were based on whole-body planar scintigraphy images acquired in 10 patients with a mean age of 71.4 ± 6.07 years (range 63–85 years) at approximately 0–2 h, 4–6 h, 18–24 h, and 36–48 h after administration of the mean 6253 ± 826.4 MBq (range 5500–7400 MBq) of (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617. Organ activities were calculated using the conjugate view method by Buijs and conventional background correction. Eventually, the absorbed dose of radiation was calculated using Medical Internal Radiation Dose formalism. RESULTS: The dose per unit of injected activity (mGy/MBq) ± standard deviation for kidney using Buijs and conventional methods was 1.05 ± 0.11 and 0.63 ± 0.14, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Buijs background correction method was more accurate than the conventional method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9380804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93808042022-08-17 Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to the Kidneys Following Radioligand Therapy with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by Two Different Background Correction Methods Mahmoudi, Elahe Pirayesh, Elahe Deevband, Mohammad Reza Amoui, Mahasti Rad, Mehrdad Ghorbani Indian J Nucl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: To improve the accuracy of activity image quality, scatter correction is a critical method. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy in calculation of absorbed dose to patients following radioligand therapy (RLT) with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by two different methods of background correction in the conjugate view method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involved 10 patients. The individualized patient dosimetry calculations were based on whole-body planar scintigraphy images acquired in 10 patients with a mean age of 71.4 ± 6.07 years (range 63–85 years) at approximately 0–2 h, 4–6 h, 18–24 h, and 36–48 h after administration of the mean 6253 ± 826.4 MBq (range 5500–7400 MBq) of (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617. Organ activities were calculated using the conjugate view method by Buijs and conventional background correction. Eventually, the absorbed dose of radiation was calculated using Medical Internal Radiation Dose formalism. RESULTS: The dose per unit of injected activity (mGy/MBq) ± standard deviation for kidney using Buijs and conventional methods was 1.05 ± 0.11 and 0.63 ± 0.14, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Buijs background correction method was more accurate than the conventional method. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9380804/ /pubmed/35982806 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_134_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mahmoudi, Elahe
Pirayesh, Elahe
Deevband, Mohammad Reza
Amoui, Mahasti
Rad, Mehrdad Ghorbani
Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to the Kidneys Following Radioligand Therapy with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by Two Different Background Correction Methods
title Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to the Kidneys Following Radioligand Therapy with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by Two Different Background Correction Methods
title_full Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to the Kidneys Following Radioligand Therapy with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by Two Different Background Correction Methods
title_fullStr Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to the Kidneys Following Radioligand Therapy with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by Two Different Background Correction Methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to the Kidneys Following Radioligand Therapy with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by Two Different Background Correction Methods
title_short Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to the Kidneys Following Radioligand Therapy with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by Two Different Background Correction Methods
title_sort comparison of accuracy in calculation of absorbed dose to the kidneys following radioligand therapy with (177)lu-dkfz-psma-617 by two different background correction methods
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9380804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35982806
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_134_21
work_keys_str_mv AT mahmoudielahe comparisonofaccuracyincalculationofabsorbeddosetothekidneysfollowingradioligandtherapywith177ludkfzpsma617bytwodifferentbackgroundcorrectionmethods
AT pirayeshelahe comparisonofaccuracyincalculationofabsorbeddosetothekidneysfollowingradioligandtherapywith177ludkfzpsma617bytwodifferentbackgroundcorrectionmethods
AT deevbandmohammadreza comparisonofaccuracyincalculationofabsorbeddosetothekidneysfollowingradioligandtherapywith177ludkfzpsma617bytwodifferentbackgroundcorrectionmethods
AT amouimahasti comparisonofaccuracyincalculationofabsorbeddosetothekidneysfollowingradioligandtherapywith177ludkfzpsma617bytwodifferentbackgroundcorrectionmethods
AT radmehrdadghorbani comparisonofaccuracyincalculationofabsorbeddosetothekidneysfollowingradioligandtherapywith177ludkfzpsma617bytwodifferentbackgroundcorrectionmethods