Cargando…
Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to the Kidneys Following Radioligand Therapy with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by Two Different Background Correction Methods
BACKGROUND: To improve the accuracy of activity image quality, scatter correction is a critical method. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy in calculation of absorbed dose to patients following radioligand therapy (RLT) with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by two different methods of background c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9380804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35982806 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_134_21 |
_version_ | 1784768946859147264 |
---|---|
author | Mahmoudi, Elahe Pirayesh, Elahe Deevband, Mohammad Reza Amoui, Mahasti Rad, Mehrdad Ghorbani |
author_facet | Mahmoudi, Elahe Pirayesh, Elahe Deevband, Mohammad Reza Amoui, Mahasti Rad, Mehrdad Ghorbani |
author_sort | Mahmoudi, Elahe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To improve the accuracy of activity image quality, scatter correction is a critical method. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy in calculation of absorbed dose to patients following radioligand therapy (RLT) with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by two different methods of background correction in the conjugate view method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involved 10 patients. The individualized patient dosimetry calculations were based on whole-body planar scintigraphy images acquired in 10 patients with a mean age of 71.4 ± 6.07 years (range 63–85 years) at approximately 0–2 h, 4–6 h, 18–24 h, and 36–48 h after administration of the mean 6253 ± 826.4 MBq (range 5500–7400 MBq) of (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617. Organ activities were calculated using the conjugate view method by Buijs and conventional background correction. Eventually, the absorbed dose of radiation was calculated using Medical Internal Radiation Dose formalism. RESULTS: The dose per unit of injected activity (mGy/MBq) ± standard deviation for kidney using Buijs and conventional methods was 1.05 ± 0.11 and 0.63 ± 0.14, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Buijs background correction method was more accurate than the conventional method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9380804 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93808042022-08-17 Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to the Kidneys Following Radioligand Therapy with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by Two Different Background Correction Methods Mahmoudi, Elahe Pirayesh, Elahe Deevband, Mohammad Reza Amoui, Mahasti Rad, Mehrdad Ghorbani Indian J Nucl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: To improve the accuracy of activity image quality, scatter correction is a critical method. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy in calculation of absorbed dose to patients following radioligand therapy (RLT) with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by two different methods of background correction in the conjugate view method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involved 10 patients. The individualized patient dosimetry calculations were based on whole-body planar scintigraphy images acquired in 10 patients with a mean age of 71.4 ± 6.07 years (range 63–85 years) at approximately 0–2 h, 4–6 h, 18–24 h, and 36–48 h after administration of the mean 6253 ± 826.4 MBq (range 5500–7400 MBq) of (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617. Organ activities were calculated using the conjugate view method by Buijs and conventional background correction. Eventually, the absorbed dose of radiation was calculated using Medical Internal Radiation Dose formalism. RESULTS: The dose per unit of injected activity (mGy/MBq) ± standard deviation for kidney using Buijs and conventional methods was 1.05 ± 0.11 and 0.63 ± 0.14, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Buijs background correction method was more accurate than the conventional method. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9380804/ /pubmed/35982806 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_134_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mahmoudi, Elahe Pirayesh, Elahe Deevband, Mohammad Reza Amoui, Mahasti Rad, Mehrdad Ghorbani Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to the Kidneys Following Radioligand Therapy with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by Two Different Background Correction Methods |
title | Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to the Kidneys Following Radioligand Therapy with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by Two Different Background Correction Methods |
title_full | Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to the Kidneys Following Radioligand Therapy with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by Two Different Background Correction Methods |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to the Kidneys Following Radioligand Therapy with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by Two Different Background Correction Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to the Kidneys Following Radioligand Therapy with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by Two Different Background Correction Methods |
title_short | Comparison of Accuracy in Calculation of Absorbed Dose to the Kidneys Following Radioligand Therapy with (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by Two Different Background Correction Methods |
title_sort | comparison of accuracy in calculation of absorbed dose to the kidneys following radioligand therapy with (177)lu-dkfz-psma-617 by two different background correction methods |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9380804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35982806 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_134_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahmoudielahe comparisonofaccuracyincalculationofabsorbeddosetothekidneysfollowingradioligandtherapywith177ludkfzpsma617bytwodifferentbackgroundcorrectionmethods AT pirayeshelahe comparisonofaccuracyincalculationofabsorbeddosetothekidneysfollowingradioligandtherapywith177ludkfzpsma617bytwodifferentbackgroundcorrectionmethods AT deevbandmohammadreza comparisonofaccuracyincalculationofabsorbeddosetothekidneysfollowingradioligandtherapywith177ludkfzpsma617bytwodifferentbackgroundcorrectionmethods AT amouimahasti comparisonofaccuracyincalculationofabsorbeddosetothekidneysfollowingradioligandtherapywith177ludkfzpsma617bytwodifferentbackgroundcorrectionmethods AT radmehrdadghorbani comparisonofaccuracyincalculationofabsorbeddosetothekidneysfollowingradioligandtherapywith177ludkfzpsma617bytwodifferentbackgroundcorrectionmethods |