Cargando…

The Optimal Cut-off of the Latex Immunoassay (LZ Test) for Helicobacter pylori Infection Based on the Stool Antigen Test and Helicobacter pylori-associated Gastritis

OBJECTIVE: Helicobacter pylori antibody kits using the latex immunoassay (LIA) are widely used in Japan. However, the optimal cut-off of the LIA remains unclear. This study clarified the optimal cut-off of the LIA for assessing the current infection status of patients (currently infected, never infe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takayama, Takako, Suzuki, Hideo, Okada, Kosuke, Akiyama, Shintaro, Narasaka, Toshiaki, Maruo, Kazushi, Sakamoto, Taku, Seo, Emiko, Tsuchiya, Kiichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35850984
http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.8659-21
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Helicobacter pylori antibody kits using the latex immunoassay (LIA) are widely used in Japan. However, the optimal cut-off of the LIA remains unclear. This study clarified the optimal cut-off of the LIA for assessing the current infection status of patients (currently infected, never infected, spontaneously eradicated) in clinical practice. METHODS: In total, 482 subjects with no history of H. pylori eradication therapy who underwent a medical examination at our hospital were enrolled. The infection status was ascertained using a stool antigen test, and the endoscopic findings of H. pylori-associated gastritis. H. pylori antibody levels were measured using the LIA. RESULTS: In total, 414, 38, and 30 subjects were categorized into the never-infected, currently infected, and spontaneously eradicated groups. The optimal cut-off based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was 4 U/mL, whereas the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity for differentiating never-infected and currently infected subjects were 0.95, 92.1%, and 94.7%, respectively. When applying the cut-off of 4 U/mL to the judgment of current infection in all subjects, the sensitivity and specificity were 92.1% and 92.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that 4 U/mL was the optimal cut-off for differentiating current infection from no prior infection, and the value may be stable because of the exclusion of subjects with spontaneous eradication. The cut-off may be useful in initial screening for current H. pylori infection.