Cargando…
The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Detection of Oral Cancer
AIM: The early detection of oral cancer (OC) at the earliest stage significantly increases survival rates. Recently, there has been an increasing interest in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in diagnostic medicine. This study aimed to critically analyse the available evidence con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35581039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2022.03.001 |
_version_ | 1784769068273762304 |
---|---|
author | Al-Rawi, Natheer Sultan, Afrah Rajai, Batool Shuaeeb, Haneen Alnajjar, Mariam Alketbi, Maryam Mohammad, Yara Shetty, Shishir Ram Mashrah, Mubarak Ahmed |
author_facet | Al-Rawi, Natheer Sultan, Afrah Rajai, Batool Shuaeeb, Haneen Alnajjar, Mariam Alketbi, Maryam Mohammad, Yara Shetty, Shishir Ram Mashrah, Mubarak Ahmed |
author_sort | Al-Rawi, Natheer |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The early detection of oral cancer (OC) at the earliest stage significantly increases survival rates. Recently, there has been an increasing interest in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in diagnostic medicine. This study aimed to critically analyse the available evidence concerning the utility of AI in the diagnosis of OC. Special consideration was given to the diagnostic accuracy of AI and its ability to identify the early stages of OC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the date of inception to December 2021, 4 databases (PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, and OVID) were searched. Three independent authors selected studies on the basis of strict inclusion criteria. The risk of bias and applicability were assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool. Of the 606 initial records, 17 studies with a total of 7245 patients and 69,425 images were included. Ten statistical methods were used to assess AI performance in the included studies. Six studies used supervised machine learning, whilst 11 used deep learning. The results of deep learning ranged with an accuracy of 81% to 99.7%, sensitivity 79% to 98.75%, specificity 82% to 100%, and area under the curve (AUC) 79% to 99.5%. RESULTS: Results obtained from supervised machine learning demonstrated an accuracy ranging from 43.5% to 100%, sensitivity of 94% to 100%, specificity 16% to 100%, and AUC of 93%. CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear consensus regarding the best AI method for OC detection. AI is a valuable diagnostic tool that represents a large evolutionary leap in the detection of OC in its early stages. Based on the evidence, deep learning, such as a deep convolutional neural network, is more accurate in the early detection of OC compared to supervised machine learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9381387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93813872022-08-18 The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Detection of Oral Cancer Al-Rawi, Natheer Sultan, Afrah Rajai, Batool Shuaeeb, Haneen Alnajjar, Mariam Alketbi, Maryam Mohammad, Yara Shetty, Shishir Ram Mashrah, Mubarak Ahmed Int Dent J Concise Clinical Review AIM: The early detection of oral cancer (OC) at the earliest stage significantly increases survival rates. Recently, there has been an increasing interest in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in diagnostic medicine. This study aimed to critically analyse the available evidence concerning the utility of AI in the diagnosis of OC. Special consideration was given to the diagnostic accuracy of AI and its ability to identify the early stages of OC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the date of inception to December 2021, 4 databases (PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, and OVID) were searched. Three independent authors selected studies on the basis of strict inclusion criteria. The risk of bias and applicability were assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool. Of the 606 initial records, 17 studies with a total of 7245 patients and 69,425 images were included. Ten statistical methods were used to assess AI performance in the included studies. Six studies used supervised machine learning, whilst 11 used deep learning. The results of deep learning ranged with an accuracy of 81% to 99.7%, sensitivity 79% to 98.75%, specificity 82% to 100%, and area under the curve (AUC) 79% to 99.5%. RESULTS: Results obtained from supervised machine learning demonstrated an accuracy ranging from 43.5% to 100%, sensitivity of 94% to 100%, specificity 16% to 100%, and AUC of 93%. CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear consensus regarding the best AI method for OC detection. AI is a valuable diagnostic tool that represents a large evolutionary leap in the detection of OC in its early stages. Based on the evidence, deep learning, such as a deep convolutional neural network, is more accurate in the early detection of OC compared to supervised machine learning. Elsevier 2022-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9381387/ /pubmed/35581039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2022.03.001 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Concise Clinical Review Al-Rawi, Natheer Sultan, Afrah Rajai, Batool Shuaeeb, Haneen Alnajjar, Mariam Alketbi, Maryam Mohammad, Yara Shetty, Shishir Ram Mashrah, Mubarak Ahmed The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Detection of Oral Cancer |
title | The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Detection of Oral Cancer |
title_full | The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Detection of Oral Cancer |
title_fullStr | The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Detection of Oral Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Detection of Oral Cancer |
title_short | The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Detection of Oral Cancer |
title_sort | effectiveness of artificial intelligence in detection of oral cancer |
topic | Concise Clinical Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35581039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2022.03.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alrawinatheer theeffectivenessofartificialintelligenceindetectionoforalcancer AT sultanafrah theeffectivenessofartificialintelligenceindetectionoforalcancer AT rajaibatool theeffectivenessofartificialintelligenceindetectionoforalcancer AT shuaeebhaneen theeffectivenessofartificialintelligenceindetectionoforalcancer AT alnajjarmariam theeffectivenessofartificialintelligenceindetectionoforalcancer AT alketbimaryam theeffectivenessofartificialintelligenceindetectionoforalcancer AT mohammadyara theeffectivenessofartificialintelligenceindetectionoforalcancer AT shettyshishirram theeffectivenessofartificialintelligenceindetectionoforalcancer AT mashrahmubarakahmed theeffectivenessofartificialintelligenceindetectionoforalcancer AT alrawinatheer effectivenessofartificialintelligenceindetectionoforalcancer AT sultanafrah effectivenessofartificialintelligenceindetectionoforalcancer AT rajaibatool effectivenessofartificialintelligenceindetectionoforalcancer AT shuaeebhaneen effectivenessofartificialintelligenceindetectionoforalcancer AT alnajjarmariam effectivenessofartificialintelligenceindetectionoforalcancer AT alketbimaryam effectivenessofartificialintelligenceindetectionoforalcancer AT mohammadyara effectivenessofartificialintelligenceindetectionoforalcancer AT shettyshishirram effectivenessofartificialintelligenceindetectionoforalcancer AT mashrahmubarakahmed effectivenessofartificialintelligenceindetectionoforalcancer |