Cargando…
Clinical performance of a new fissure sealant—results from a 2-year randomized clinical trial
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to explore the clinical survival of a new, Bis-GMA-free pit and fissure sealant (Helioseal F Plus) in comparison to an established control material (Helioseal F). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This in vivo study was designed as a prospective, 2...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35499655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04514-w |
_version_ | 1784769089936293888 |
---|---|
author | Schill, Helen Graeser, Peter Bücher, Katharina Pfisterer, Jan Khazaei, Yeganeh Enggist, Lukas Hickel, Reinhard Kühnisch, Jan |
author_facet | Schill, Helen Graeser, Peter Bücher, Katharina Pfisterer, Jan Khazaei, Yeganeh Enggist, Lukas Hickel, Reinhard Kühnisch, Jan |
author_sort | Schill, Helen |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to explore the clinical survival of a new, Bis-GMA-free pit and fissure sealant (Helioseal F Plus) in comparison to an established control material (Helioseal F). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This in vivo study was designed as a prospective, 2-year, two-centre RCT with a split-mouth design. The initial study population consisted of 92 adolescents who were followed up 1 month (N = 89), 6 months (N = 88), 1 year (N = 85) and 2 years (N = 82) after sealant application. The attrition rate was 10.9% after 2 years. At each examination, the sealant retention and presence of caries were recorded. The statistical analysis included the calculation of Kaplan–Meier survival curves, log-rank tests and a Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: No adverse events during the application or any of the follow-up visits were documented. The proportion of completely intact sealants and those with minimal loss was almost identical in both groups at 85.9% (Helioseal F Plus) and 86.5% Helioseal F) after 2 years of observation. The regression analysis revealed operator dependency; no significant differences were found between the materials, the study centres, the chosen isolation technique and patient age or sex. CONCLUSION: The newly developed sealant can be evaluated as at least equivalent in terms of survival and retention behaviour compared to the established control material. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The new sealant can be recommended for clinical use. With respect to the material properties (Bis-GMA-free, less light polymerisation time and better thixotropic behaviour), it offers additional advantages with clinical relevance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9381488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93814882022-08-18 Clinical performance of a new fissure sealant—results from a 2-year randomized clinical trial Schill, Helen Graeser, Peter Bücher, Katharina Pfisterer, Jan Khazaei, Yeganeh Enggist, Lukas Hickel, Reinhard Kühnisch, Jan Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to explore the clinical survival of a new, Bis-GMA-free pit and fissure sealant (Helioseal F Plus) in comparison to an established control material (Helioseal F). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This in vivo study was designed as a prospective, 2-year, two-centre RCT with a split-mouth design. The initial study population consisted of 92 adolescents who were followed up 1 month (N = 89), 6 months (N = 88), 1 year (N = 85) and 2 years (N = 82) after sealant application. The attrition rate was 10.9% after 2 years. At each examination, the sealant retention and presence of caries were recorded. The statistical analysis included the calculation of Kaplan–Meier survival curves, log-rank tests and a Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: No adverse events during the application or any of the follow-up visits were documented. The proportion of completely intact sealants and those with minimal loss was almost identical in both groups at 85.9% (Helioseal F Plus) and 86.5% Helioseal F) after 2 years of observation. The regression analysis revealed operator dependency; no significant differences were found between the materials, the study centres, the chosen isolation technique and patient age or sex. CONCLUSION: The newly developed sealant can be evaluated as at least equivalent in terms of survival and retention behaviour compared to the established control material. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The new sealant can be recommended for clinical use. With respect to the material properties (Bis-GMA-free, less light polymerisation time and better thixotropic behaviour), it offers additional advantages with clinical relevance. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-05-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9381488/ /pubmed/35499655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04514-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Schill, Helen Graeser, Peter Bücher, Katharina Pfisterer, Jan Khazaei, Yeganeh Enggist, Lukas Hickel, Reinhard Kühnisch, Jan Clinical performance of a new fissure sealant—results from a 2-year randomized clinical trial |
title | Clinical performance of a new fissure sealant—results from a 2-year randomized clinical trial |
title_full | Clinical performance of a new fissure sealant—results from a 2-year randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Clinical performance of a new fissure sealant—results from a 2-year randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical performance of a new fissure sealant—results from a 2-year randomized clinical trial |
title_short | Clinical performance of a new fissure sealant—results from a 2-year randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | clinical performance of a new fissure sealant—results from a 2-year randomized clinical trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35499655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04514-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schillhelen clinicalperformanceofanewfissuresealantresultsfroma2yearrandomizedclinicaltrial AT graeserpeter clinicalperformanceofanewfissuresealantresultsfroma2yearrandomizedclinicaltrial AT bucherkatharina clinicalperformanceofanewfissuresealantresultsfroma2yearrandomizedclinicaltrial AT pfistererjan clinicalperformanceofanewfissuresealantresultsfroma2yearrandomizedclinicaltrial AT khazaeiyeganeh clinicalperformanceofanewfissuresealantresultsfroma2yearrandomizedclinicaltrial AT enggistlukas clinicalperformanceofanewfissuresealantresultsfroma2yearrandomizedclinicaltrial AT hickelreinhard clinicalperformanceofanewfissuresealantresultsfroma2yearrandomizedclinicaltrial AT kuhnischjan clinicalperformanceofanewfissuresealantresultsfroma2yearrandomizedclinicaltrial |