Cargando…

Differences in fluid removal of different open-pore elements for endoscopic negative pressure therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract

Endoscopic negative pressure therapy is an effective treatment strategy for various defects of the gastrointestinal tract. The functional principle is based on an open-pore element, which is placed around a perforated drainage tube and connected to a vacuum source. The resulting open-pore suction de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jansen, Kai Tobias, Hetzel, Jürgen, Schulte, Carola, Düzenli, Nurgül, Fusco, Stefano, Zerabruck, Emanuel, Schmider, Eva, Malek, Nisar P., Königsrainer, Alfred, Stüker, Dietmar, Werner, Christoph R., Wichmann, Dörte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35974057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17700-3
_version_ 1784769103861383168
author Jansen, Kai Tobias
Hetzel, Jürgen
Schulte, Carola
Düzenli, Nurgül
Fusco, Stefano
Zerabruck, Emanuel
Schmider, Eva
Malek, Nisar P.
Königsrainer, Alfred
Stüker, Dietmar
Werner, Christoph R.
Wichmann, Dörte
author_facet Jansen, Kai Tobias
Hetzel, Jürgen
Schulte, Carola
Düzenli, Nurgül
Fusco, Stefano
Zerabruck, Emanuel
Schmider, Eva
Malek, Nisar P.
Königsrainer, Alfred
Stüker, Dietmar
Werner, Christoph R.
Wichmann, Dörte
author_sort Jansen, Kai Tobias
collection PubMed
description Endoscopic negative pressure therapy is an effective treatment strategy for various defects of the gastrointestinal tract. The functional principle is based on an open-pore element, which is placed around a perforated drainage tube and connected to a vacuum source. The resulting open-pore suction device can undergo endoluminal or intracavitary placement. Different open-pore suction devices are used for endoscopic negative pressure therapy of upper gastrointestinal tract defects. Comparative analyses for features and properties of these devices are still lacking. Eight different (six hand-made devices and two commercial devices) open-pore suction devices for endoscopic negative pressure therapy of the upper gastrointestinal tract were used, amount fluid removed was evaluated. The evaluation parameters included the time to reach the target pressure, the time required to remove 100 ml of water, and the material resistance of the device. All open-pore suction devices are able to aspirate the target volume of fluids. The time to reach the target volume varied considerably. Target negative pressure was not achieved with all open-pore suction devices during the aspiration of fluids; however, there was no negative effect on suction efficiency. Of the measurement data, material resistance could be calculated for six open-pore elements. We present a simple experimental, nonphysiologically setup for open-pore suction devices used for endoscopic negative pressure therapy. The expected quantity of fluids secreted into the treated organs should affect open-pore suction device for endoscopic negative pressure therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9381550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93815502022-08-18 Differences in fluid removal of different open-pore elements for endoscopic negative pressure therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract Jansen, Kai Tobias Hetzel, Jürgen Schulte, Carola Düzenli, Nurgül Fusco, Stefano Zerabruck, Emanuel Schmider, Eva Malek, Nisar P. Königsrainer, Alfred Stüker, Dietmar Werner, Christoph R. Wichmann, Dörte Sci Rep Article Endoscopic negative pressure therapy is an effective treatment strategy for various defects of the gastrointestinal tract. The functional principle is based on an open-pore element, which is placed around a perforated drainage tube and connected to a vacuum source. The resulting open-pore suction device can undergo endoluminal or intracavitary placement. Different open-pore suction devices are used for endoscopic negative pressure therapy of upper gastrointestinal tract defects. Comparative analyses for features and properties of these devices are still lacking. Eight different (six hand-made devices and two commercial devices) open-pore suction devices for endoscopic negative pressure therapy of the upper gastrointestinal tract were used, amount fluid removed was evaluated. The evaluation parameters included the time to reach the target pressure, the time required to remove 100 ml of water, and the material resistance of the device. All open-pore suction devices are able to aspirate the target volume of fluids. The time to reach the target volume varied considerably. Target negative pressure was not achieved with all open-pore suction devices during the aspiration of fluids; however, there was no negative effect on suction efficiency. Of the measurement data, material resistance could be calculated for six open-pore elements. We present a simple experimental, nonphysiologically setup for open-pore suction devices used for endoscopic negative pressure therapy. The expected quantity of fluids secreted into the treated organs should affect open-pore suction device for endoscopic negative pressure therapy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9381550/ /pubmed/35974057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17700-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Jansen, Kai Tobias
Hetzel, Jürgen
Schulte, Carola
Düzenli, Nurgül
Fusco, Stefano
Zerabruck, Emanuel
Schmider, Eva
Malek, Nisar P.
Königsrainer, Alfred
Stüker, Dietmar
Werner, Christoph R.
Wichmann, Dörte
Differences in fluid removal of different open-pore elements for endoscopic negative pressure therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract
title Differences in fluid removal of different open-pore elements for endoscopic negative pressure therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract
title_full Differences in fluid removal of different open-pore elements for endoscopic negative pressure therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract
title_fullStr Differences in fluid removal of different open-pore elements for endoscopic negative pressure therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract
title_full_unstemmed Differences in fluid removal of different open-pore elements for endoscopic negative pressure therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract
title_short Differences in fluid removal of different open-pore elements for endoscopic negative pressure therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract
title_sort differences in fluid removal of different open-pore elements for endoscopic negative pressure therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35974057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17700-3
work_keys_str_mv AT jansenkaitobias differencesinfluidremovalofdifferentopenporeelementsforendoscopicnegativepressuretherapyintheuppergastrointestinaltract
AT hetzeljurgen differencesinfluidremovalofdifferentopenporeelementsforendoscopicnegativepressuretherapyintheuppergastrointestinaltract
AT schultecarola differencesinfluidremovalofdifferentopenporeelementsforendoscopicnegativepressuretherapyintheuppergastrointestinaltract
AT duzenlinurgul differencesinfluidremovalofdifferentopenporeelementsforendoscopicnegativepressuretherapyintheuppergastrointestinaltract
AT fuscostefano differencesinfluidremovalofdifferentopenporeelementsforendoscopicnegativepressuretherapyintheuppergastrointestinaltract
AT zerabruckemanuel differencesinfluidremovalofdifferentopenporeelementsforendoscopicnegativepressuretherapyintheuppergastrointestinaltract
AT schmidereva differencesinfluidremovalofdifferentopenporeelementsforendoscopicnegativepressuretherapyintheuppergastrointestinaltract
AT maleknisarp differencesinfluidremovalofdifferentopenporeelementsforendoscopicnegativepressuretherapyintheuppergastrointestinaltract
AT konigsraineralfred differencesinfluidremovalofdifferentopenporeelementsforendoscopicnegativepressuretherapyintheuppergastrointestinaltract
AT stukerdietmar differencesinfluidremovalofdifferentopenporeelementsforendoscopicnegativepressuretherapyintheuppergastrointestinaltract
AT wernerchristophr differencesinfluidremovalofdifferentopenporeelementsforendoscopicnegativepressuretherapyintheuppergastrointestinaltract
AT wichmanndorte differencesinfluidremovalofdifferentopenporeelementsforendoscopicnegativepressuretherapyintheuppergastrointestinaltract