Cargando…
Evaluation of Digital Drawing Tests and Paper-and-Pencil Drawing Tests for the Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Studies
Digital drawing tests have been proposed for cognitive screening over the past decade. However, the diagnostic performance is still to clarify. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance among different types of digital and paper-and-pencil drawing tests in the screening...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34657249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-021-09523-2 |
_version_ | 1784769115824586752 |
---|---|
author | Chan, Joyce Y. C. Bat, Baker K. K. Wong, Adrian Chan, Tak Kit Huo, Zhaohua Yip, Benjamin H. K. Kowk, Timothy C. Y. Tsoi, Kelvin K. F. |
author_facet | Chan, Joyce Y. C. Bat, Baker K. K. Wong, Adrian Chan, Tak Kit Huo, Zhaohua Yip, Benjamin H. K. Kowk, Timothy C. Y. Tsoi, Kelvin K. F. |
author_sort | Chan, Joyce Y. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Digital drawing tests have been proposed for cognitive screening over the past decade. However, the diagnostic performance is still to clarify. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance among different types of digital and paper-and-pencil drawing tests in the screening of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Diagnostic studies evaluating digital or paper-and-pencil drawing tests for the screening of MCI or dementia were identified from OVID databases, included Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Studies evaluated any type of drawing tests for the screening of MCI or dementia and compared with healthy controls. This study was performed according to PRISMA and the guidelines proposed by the Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Working Group. A bivariate random-effects model was used to compare the diagnostic performance of these drawing tests and presented with a summary receiver-operating characteristic curve. The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of clock drawing test (CDT). Other types of drawing tests were the secondary outcomes. A total of 90 studies with 22,567 participants were included. In the screening of MCI, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the digital CDT was 0.86 (95% CI = 0.75 to 0.92) and 0.92 (95% CI = 0.69 to 0.98), respectively. For the paper-and-pencil CDT, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of brief scoring method was 0.63 (95% CI = 0.49 to 0.75) and 0.77 (95% CI = 0.68 to 0.84), and detailed scoring method was 0.63 (95% CI = 0.56 to 0.71) and 0.72 (95% CI = 0.65 to 0.78). In the screening of dementia, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the digital CDT was 0.83 (95% CI = 0.72 to 0.90) and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.79 to 0.92). The performances of the digital and paper-and-pencil pentagon drawing tests were comparable in the screening of dementia. The digital CDT demonstrated better diagnostic performance than paper-and-pencil CDT for MCI. Other types of digital drawing tests showed comparable performance with paper-and-pencil formats. Therefore, digital drawing tests can be used as an alternative tool for the screening of MCI and dementia. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11065-021-09523-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9381608 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93816082022-08-18 Evaluation of Digital Drawing Tests and Paper-and-Pencil Drawing Tests for the Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Studies Chan, Joyce Y. C. Bat, Baker K. K. Wong, Adrian Chan, Tak Kit Huo, Zhaohua Yip, Benjamin H. K. Kowk, Timothy C. Y. Tsoi, Kelvin K. F. Neuropsychol Rev Review Digital drawing tests have been proposed for cognitive screening over the past decade. However, the diagnostic performance is still to clarify. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance among different types of digital and paper-and-pencil drawing tests in the screening of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Diagnostic studies evaluating digital or paper-and-pencil drawing tests for the screening of MCI or dementia were identified from OVID databases, included Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Studies evaluated any type of drawing tests for the screening of MCI or dementia and compared with healthy controls. This study was performed according to PRISMA and the guidelines proposed by the Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Working Group. A bivariate random-effects model was used to compare the diagnostic performance of these drawing tests and presented with a summary receiver-operating characteristic curve. The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of clock drawing test (CDT). Other types of drawing tests were the secondary outcomes. A total of 90 studies with 22,567 participants were included. In the screening of MCI, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the digital CDT was 0.86 (95% CI = 0.75 to 0.92) and 0.92 (95% CI = 0.69 to 0.98), respectively. For the paper-and-pencil CDT, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of brief scoring method was 0.63 (95% CI = 0.49 to 0.75) and 0.77 (95% CI = 0.68 to 0.84), and detailed scoring method was 0.63 (95% CI = 0.56 to 0.71) and 0.72 (95% CI = 0.65 to 0.78). In the screening of dementia, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the digital CDT was 0.83 (95% CI = 0.72 to 0.90) and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.79 to 0.92). The performances of the digital and paper-and-pencil pentagon drawing tests were comparable in the screening of dementia. The digital CDT demonstrated better diagnostic performance than paper-and-pencil CDT for MCI. Other types of digital drawing tests showed comparable performance with paper-and-pencil formats. Therefore, digital drawing tests can be used as an alternative tool for the screening of MCI and dementia. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11065-021-09523-2. Springer US 2021-10-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9381608/ /pubmed/34657249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-021-09523-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Chan, Joyce Y. C. Bat, Baker K. K. Wong, Adrian Chan, Tak Kit Huo, Zhaohua Yip, Benjamin H. K. Kowk, Timothy C. Y. Tsoi, Kelvin K. F. Evaluation of Digital Drawing Tests and Paper-and-Pencil Drawing Tests for the Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Studies |
title | Evaluation of Digital Drawing Tests and Paper-and-Pencil Drawing Tests for the Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Studies |
title_full | Evaluation of Digital Drawing Tests and Paper-and-Pencil Drawing Tests for the Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Studies |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Digital Drawing Tests and Paper-and-Pencil Drawing Tests for the Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Digital Drawing Tests and Paper-and-Pencil Drawing Tests for the Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Studies |
title_short | Evaluation of Digital Drawing Tests and Paper-and-Pencil Drawing Tests for the Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Studies |
title_sort | evaluation of digital drawing tests and paper-and-pencil drawing tests for the screening of mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34657249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-021-09523-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chanjoyceyc evaluationofdigitaldrawingtestsandpaperandpencildrawingtestsforthescreeningofmildcognitiveimpairmentanddementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticstudies AT batbakerkk evaluationofdigitaldrawingtestsandpaperandpencildrawingtestsforthescreeningofmildcognitiveimpairmentanddementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticstudies AT wongadrian evaluationofdigitaldrawingtestsandpaperandpencildrawingtestsforthescreeningofmildcognitiveimpairmentanddementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticstudies AT chantakkit evaluationofdigitaldrawingtestsandpaperandpencildrawingtestsforthescreeningofmildcognitiveimpairmentanddementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticstudies AT huozhaohua evaluationofdigitaldrawingtestsandpaperandpencildrawingtestsforthescreeningofmildcognitiveimpairmentanddementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticstudies AT yipbenjaminhk evaluationofdigitaldrawingtestsandpaperandpencildrawingtestsforthescreeningofmildcognitiveimpairmentanddementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticstudies AT kowktimothycy evaluationofdigitaldrawingtestsandpaperandpencildrawingtestsforthescreeningofmildcognitiveimpairmentanddementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticstudies AT tsoikelvinkf evaluationofdigitaldrawingtestsandpaperandpencildrawingtestsforthescreeningofmildcognitiveimpairmentanddementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnosticstudies |