Cargando…

Interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for MRI–based 2018 FIGO staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the interobserver agreement for MRI–based 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging parameters in patients with cervical cancer and assess the prognostic value of these MRI parameters in relation to other clinicopathological markers. METHODS: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagner-Larsen, Kari S., Lura, Njål, Salvesen, Øyvind, Halle, Mari Kyllesø, Forsse, David, Trovik, Jone, Smit, Noeska, Krakstad, Camilla, Haldorsen, Ingfrid S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35332408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08666-x
_version_ 1784769118541447168
author Wagner-Larsen, Kari S.
Lura, Njål
Salvesen, Øyvind
Halle, Mari Kyllesø
Forsse, David
Trovik, Jone
Smit, Noeska
Krakstad, Camilla
Haldorsen, Ingfrid S.
author_facet Wagner-Larsen, Kari S.
Lura, Njål
Salvesen, Øyvind
Halle, Mari Kyllesø
Forsse, David
Trovik, Jone
Smit, Noeska
Krakstad, Camilla
Haldorsen, Ingfrid S.
author_sort Wagner-Larsen, Kari S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the interobserver agreement for MRI–based 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging parameters in patients with cervical cancer and assess the prognostic value of these MRI parameters in relation to other clinicopathological markers. METHODS: This retrospective study included 416 women with histologically confirmed cervical cancer who underwent pretreatment pelvic MRI from May 2002 to December 2017. Three radiologists independently recorded MRI–derived staging parameters incorporated in the 2018 FIGO staging system. Kappa coefficients (κ) for interobserver agreement were calculated. The predictive and prognostic values of the MRI parameters were explored using ROC analyses and Kaplan–Meier with log-rank tests, and analyzed in relation to clinicopathological patient characteristics. RESULTS: Overall agreement was substantial for the staging parameters: tumor size > 2 cm (κ = 0.80), tumor size > 4 cm (κ = 0.76), tumor size categories (≤ 2 cm; > 2 and ≤ 4 cm; > 4 cm) (κ = 0.78), parametrial invasion (κ = 0.63), vaginal invasion (κ = 0.61), and enlarged lymph nodes (κ = 0.63). Higher MRI–derived tumor size category (≤ 2 cm; > 2 and ≤ 4 cm; > 4 cm) was associated with a stepwise reduction in survival (p ≤ 0.001 for all). Tumor size > 4 cm and parametrial invasion at MRI were associated with aggressive clinicopathological features, and the incorporation of these MRI–based staging parameters improved risk stratification when compared to corresponding clinical assessments alone. CONCLUSION: The interobserver agreement for central MRI–derived 2018 FIGO staging parameters was substantial. MRI improved the identification of patients with aggressive clinicopathological features and poor survival, demonstrating the potential impact of MRI enabling better prognostication and treatment tailoring in cervical cancer. KEY POINTS: • The overall interobserver agreement was substantial (κ values 0.61–0.80) for central MRI staging parameters in the 2018 FIGO system. • Higher MRI–derived tumor size category was linked to a stepwise reduction in survival (p ≤ 0.001 for all). • MRI–derived tumor size > 4 cm and parametrial invasion were associated with aggressive clinicopathological features, and the incorporation of these MRI–derived staging parameters improved risk stratification when compared to clinical assessments alone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-08666-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9381622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93816222022-08-18 Interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for MRI–based 2018 FIGO staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer Wagner-Larsen, Kari S. Lura, Njål Salvesen, Øyvind Halle, Mari Kyllesø Forsse, David Trovik, Jone Smit, Noeska Krakstad, Camilla Haldorsen, Ingfrid S. Eur Radiol Magnetic Resonance OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the interobserver agreement for MRI–based 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging parameters in patients with cervical cancer and assess the prognostic value of these MRI parameters in relation to other clinicopathological markers. METHODS: This retrospective study included 416 women with histologically confirmed cervical cancer who underwent pretreatment pelvic MRI from May 2002 to December 2017. Three radiologists independently recorded MRI–derived staging parameters incorporated in the 2018 FIGO staging system. Kappa coefficients (κ) for interobserver agreement were calculated. The predictive and prognostic values of the MRI parameters were explored using ROC analyses and Kaplan–Meier with log-rank tests, and analyzed in relation to clinicopathological patient characteristics. RESULTS: Overall agreement was substantial for the staging parameters: tumor size > 2 cm (κ = 0.80), tumor size > 4 cm (κ = 0.76), tumor size categories (≤ 2 cm; > 2 and ≤ 4 cm; > 4 cm) (κ = 0.78), parametrial invasion (κ = 0.63), vaginal invasion (κ = 0.61), and enlarged lymph nodes (κ = 0.63). Higher MRI–derived tumor size category (≤ 2 cm; > 2 and ≤ 4 cm; > 4 cm) was associated with a stepwise reduction in survival (p ≤ 0.001 for all). Tumor size > 4 cm and parametrial invasion at MRI were associated with aggressive clinicopathological features, and the incorporation of these MRI–based staging parameters improved risk stratification when compared to corresponding clinical assessments alone. CONCLUSION: The interobserver agreement for central MRI–derived 2018 FIGO staging parameters was substantial. MRI improved the identification of patients with aggressive clinicopathological features and poor survival, demonstrating the potential impact of MRI enabling better prognostication and treatment tailoring in cervical cancer. KEY POINTS: • The overall interobserver agreement was substantial (κ values 0.61–0.80) for central MRI staging parameters in the 2018 FIGO system. • Higher MRI–derived tumor size category was linked to a stepwise reduction in survival (p ≤ 0.001 for all). • MRI–derived tumor size > 4 cm and parametrial invasion were associated with aggressive clinicopathological features, and the incorporation of these MRI–derived staging parameters improved risk stratification when compared to clinical assessments alone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-08666-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-24 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9381622/ /pubmed/35332408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08666-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Magnetic Resonance
Wagner-Larsen, Kari S.
Lura, Njål
Salvesen, Øyvind
Halle, Mari Kyllesø
Forsse, David
Trovik, Jone
Smit, Noeska
Krakstad, Camilla
Haldorsen, Ingfrid S.
Interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for MRI–based 2018 FIGO staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer
title Interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for MRI–based 2018 FIGO staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer
title_full Interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for MRI–based 2018 FIGO staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer
title_fullStr Interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for MRI–based 2018 FIGO staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed Interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for MRI–based 2018 FIGO staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer
title_short Interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for MRI–based 2018 FIGO staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer
title_sort interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for mri–based 2018 figo staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer
topic Magnetic Resonance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35332408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08666-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wagnerlarsenkaris interobserveragreementandprognosticimpactformribased2018figostagingparametersinuterinecervicalcancer
AT luranjal interobserveragreementandprognosticimpactformribased2018figostagingparametersinuterinecervicalcancer
AT salvesenøyvind interobserveragreementandprognosticimpactformribased2018figostagingparametersinuterinecervicalcancer
AT hallemarikyllesø interobserveragreementandprognosticimpactformribased2018figostagingparametersinuterinecervicalcancer
AT forssedavid interobserveragreementandprognosticimpactformribased2018figostagingparametersinuterinecervicalcancer
AT trovikjone interobserveragreementandprognosticimpactformribased2018figostagingparametersinuterinecervicalcancer
AT smitnoeska interobserveragreementandprognosticimpactformribased2018figostagingparametersinuterinecervicalcancer
AT krakstadcamilla interobserveragreementandprognosticimpactformribased2018figostagingparametersinuterinecervicalcancer
AT haldorseningfrids interobserveragreementandprognosticimpactformribased2018figostagingparametersinuterinecervicalcancer