Cargando…

Comparative analysis of lateral maxillary sinus augmentation with a xenogeneic bone substitute material in combination with piezosurgical preparation and bony wall repositioning or rotary instrumentation and membrane coverage: a prospective randomized clinical and histological study

OBJECTIVES: The present randomized controlled clinical study aimed to investigate if, in lateral maxillary sinus augmentation, the repositioned bony wall or the application of a collagen membrane results in more preferable new hard tissue formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients were divided...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Molnár, Bálint, Jung, Anne-Kathrin, Papp, Zsuzsanna, Martin, Anna, Orbán, Kristóf, Pröhl, Annica, Jung, Ole, Barbeck, Mike, Windisch, Péter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35593928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04494-x
_version_ 1784769119971704832
author Molnár, Bálint
Jung, Anne-Kathrin
Papp, Zsuzsanna
Martin, Anna
Orbán, Kristóf
Pröhl, Annica
Jung, Ole
Barbeck, Mike
Windisch, Péter
author_facet Molnár, Bálint
Jung, Anne-Kathrin
Papp, Zsuzsanna
Martin, Anna
Orbán, Kristóf
Pröhl, Annica
Jung, Ole
Barbeck, Mike
Windisch, Péter
author_sort Molnár, Bálint
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The present randomized controlled clinical study aimed to investigate if, in lateral maxillary sinus augmentation, the repositioned bony wall or the application of a collagen membrane results in more preferable new hard tissue formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients were divided into two study groups. Both groups received a xenogeneic bone substitute material (BSM) during lateral sinus augmentation. In the bony wall group (BW), following piezosurgery, the retrieved bony wall was repositioned. In the collagen membrane group (CM), following rotary instrument preparation, collagen membrane coverage was applied. After 6 months, biopsies were taken to histologically analyze the percentage of BSM, connective tissue (CT), and newly formed bone (NFB) following both approaches. RESULTS: Forty implants were placed and 29 harvested biopsies could be evaluated. Duration of surgery, membrane perforations, and VAS were detected. Histomorphometrical analysis revealed comparable amounts of all analyzed parameters in both groups in descending order: CT (BW: 39.2 ± 9%, CM: 37,9 ± 8.5%) > BSM (BW: 32.9 ± 6.3%, CM: 31.8 ± 8.8%) > NB (BW: 27.8 ± 11.2%, CM: 30.3 ± 4.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study show that the closure of the access window by means of the retrieved bony wall or a native collagen membrane led to comparable bone augmentation results. CLINICAL TRIAL: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04811768. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Lateral maxillary sinus augmentation with the application of a xenogeneic BSM in combination with a native collagen membrane for bony window coverage represents a reliable method for surgical reconstruction of the posterior maxilla. Piezosurgery with bony window repositioning delivers comparable outcomes without membrane coverage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9381628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93816282022-08-18 Comparative analysis of lateral maxillary sinus augmentation with a xenogeneic bone substitute material in combination with piezosurgical preparation and bony wall repositioning or rotary instrumentation and membrane coverage: a prospective randomized clinical and histological study Molnár, Bálint Jung, Anne-Kathrin Papp, Zsuzsanna Martin, Anna Orbán, Kristóf Pröhl, Annica Jung, Ole Barbeck, Mike Windisch, Péter Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: The present randomized controlled clinical study aimed to investigate if, in lateral maxillary sinus augmentation, the repositioned bony wall or the application of a collagen membrane results in more preferable new hard tissue formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients were divided into two study groups. Both groups received a xenogeneic bone substitute material (BSM) during lateral sinus augmentation. In the bony wall group (BW), following piezosurgery, the retrieved bony wall was repositioned. In the collagen membrane group (CM), following rotary instrument preparation, collagen membrane coverage was applied. After 6 months, biopsies were taken to histologically analyze the percentage of BSM, connective tissue (CT), and newly formed bone (NFB) following both approaches. RESULTS: Forty implants were placed and 29 harvested biopsies could be evaluated. Duration of surgery, membrane perforations, and VAS were detected. Histomorphometrical analysis revealed comparable amounts of all analyzed parameters in both groups in descending order: CT (BW: 39.2 ± 9%, CM: 37,9 ± 8.5%) > BSM (BW: 32.9 ± 6.3%, CM: 31.8 ± 8.8%) > NB (BW: 27.8 ± 11.2%, CM: 30.3 ± 4.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study show that the closure of the access window by means of the retrieved bony wall or a native collagen membrane led to comparable bone augmentation results. CLINICAL TRIAL: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04811768. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Lateral maxillary sinus augmentation with the application of a xenogeneic BSM in combination with a native collagen membrane for bony window coverage represents a reliable method for surgical reconstruction of the posterior maxilla. Piezosurgery with bony window repositioning delivers comparable outcomes without membrane coverage. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-05-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9381628/ /pubmed/35593928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04494-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Molnár, Bálint
Jung, Anne-Kathrin
Papp, Zsuzsanna
Martin, Anna
Orbán, Kristóf
Pröhl, Annica
Jung, Ole
Barbeck, Mike
Windisch, Péter
Comparative analysis of lateral maxillary sinus augmentation with a xenogeneic bone substitute material in combination with piezosurgical preparation and bony wall repositioning or rotary instrumentation and membrane coverage: a prospective randomized clinical and histological study
title Comparative analysis of lateral maxillary sinus augmentation with a xenogeneic bone substitute material in combination with piezosurgical preparation and bony wall repositioning or rotary instrumentation and membrane coverage: a prospective randomized clinical and histological study
title_full Comparative analysis of lateral maxillary sinus augmentation with a xenogeneic bone substitute material in combination with piezosurgical preparation and bony wall repositioning or rotary instrumentation and membrane coverage: a prospective randomized clinical and histological study
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of lateral maxillary sinus augmentation with a xenogeneic bone substitute material in combination with piezosurgical preparation and bony wall repositioning or rotary instrumentation and membrane coverage: a prospective randomized clinical and histological study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of lateral maxillary sinus augmentation with a xenogeneic bone substitute material in combination with piezosurgical preparation and bony wall repositioning or rotary instrumentation and membrane coverage: a prospective randomized clinical and histological study
title_short Comparative analysis of lateral maxillary sinus augmentation with a xenogeneic bone substitute material in combination with piezosurgical preparation and bony wall repositioning or rotary instrumentation and membrane coverage: a prospective randomized clinical and histological study
title_sort comparative analysis of lateral maxillary sinus augmentation with a xenogeneic bone substitute material in combination with piezosurgical preparation and bony wall repositioning or rotary instrumentation and membrane coverage: a prospective randomized clinical and histological study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35593928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04494-x
work_keys_str_mv AT molnarbalint comparativeanalysisoflateralmaxillarysinusaugmentationwithaxenogeneicbonesubstitutematerialincombinationwithpiezosurgicalpreparationandbonywallrepositioningorrotaryinstrumentationandmembranecoverageaprospectiverandomizedclinicalandhistologicalstudy
AT jungannekathrin comparativeanalysisoflateralmaxillarysinusaugmentationwithaxenogeneicbonesubstitutematerialincombinationwithpiezosurgicalpreparationandbonywallrepositioningorrotaryinstrumentationandmembranecoverageaprospectiverandomizedclinicalandhistologicalstudy
AT pappzsuzsanna comparativeanalysisoflateralmaxillarysinusaugmentationwithaxenogeneicbonesubstitutematerialincombinationwithpiezosurgicalpreparationandbonywallrepositioningorrotaryinstrumentationandmembranecoverageaprospectiverandomizedclinicalandhistologicalstudy
AT martinanna comparativeanalysisoflateralmaxillarysinusaugmentationwithaxenogeneicbonesubstitutematerialincombinationwithpiezosurgicalpreparationandbonywallrepositioningorrotaryinstrumentationandmembranecoverageaprospectiverandomizedclinicalandhistologicalstudy
AT orbankristof comparativeanalysisoflateralmaxillarysinusaugmentationwithaxenogeneicbonesubstitutematerialincombinationwithpiezosurgicalpreparationandbonywallrepositioningorrotaryinstrumentationandmembranecoverageaprospectiverandomizedclinicalandhistologicalstudy
AT prohlannica comparativeanalysisoflateralmaxillarysinusaugmentationwithaxenogeneicbonesubstitutematerialincombinationwithpiezosurgicalpreparationandbonywallrepositioningorrotaryinstrumentationandmembranecoverageaprospectiverandomizedclinicalandhistologicalstudy
AT jungole comparativeanalysisoflateralmaxillarysinusaugmentationwithaxenogeneicbonesubstitutematerialincombinationwithpiezosurgicalpreparationandbonywallrepositioningorrotaryinstrumentationandmembranecoverageaprospectiverandomizedclinicalandhistologicalstudy
AT barbeckmike comparativeanalysisoflateralmaxillarysinusaugmentationwithaxenogeneicbonesubstitutematerialincombinationwithpiezosurgicalpreparationandbonywallrepositioningorrotaryinstrumentationandmembranecoverageaprospectiverandomizedclinicalandhistologicalstudy
AT windischpeter comparativeanalysisoflateralmaxillarysinusaugmentationwithaxenogeneicbonesubstitutematerialincombinationwithpiezosurgicalpreparationandbonywallrepositioningorrotaryinstrumentationandmembranecoverageaprospectiverandomizedclinicalandhistologicalstudy