Cargando…
Evaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, England
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ‘Call for a Kit’ health promotion intervention that was initiated in Lancashire, England to improve bowel cancer screening uptake. METHODS: Within the intervention, screening non-responders are called and invited to attend a consultation with a health promotion team member...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09691413221089184 |
_version_ | 1784769128961146880 |
---|---|
author | Stoffel, Sandro T McGregor, Lesley Hirst, Yasemin Hanif, Sahida Morris, Lorraine von Wagner, Christian |
author_facet | Stoffel, Sandro T McGregor, Lesley Hirst, Yasemin Hanif, Sahida Morris, Lorraine von Wagner, Christian |
author_sort | Stoffel, Sandro T |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ‘Call for a Kit’ health promotion intervention that was initiated in Lancashire, England to improve bowel cancer screening uptake. METHODS: Within the intervention, screening non-responders are called and invited to attend a consultation with a health promotion team member at their primary care practice. In this audit, we analysed the proportion of those contacted who attended the in-person clinic versus those who received a phone consultation, the number returning a test kit from in-person versus phone consultations, and the extent to which test kit return was moderated by sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: In 2019, 68 practices participated in the intervention which led to 10,772 individuals being contacted; 2464 accepted the invitation to an in-person consultation, of whom 1943 attended. A further 1065 agreed to and attended a consultation over the phone. The 3008 consultations resulted in 2890 test kits being ordered, of which 1608 (55.6%) were returned. The intervention therefore yielded a 14.9% response rate in the total cohort; 71.5% of test kits came from individuals attending the in-person consultation. Women and those registered with a practice in socioeconomically deprived areas were less likely to return the test kit. Individuals with a black, mixed or a non-Indian/Pakistani Asian ethnic background were significantly more likely to accept the offer of an in-person consultation and return the test kit. CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrated the strong likelihood of people returning a test kit after an in-person appointment but also the usefulness of using phone consultations as a safety net for people unable or unwilling to attend in-person clinics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9381688 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93816882022-08-18 Evaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, England Stoffel, Sandro T McGregor, Lesley Hirst, Yasemin Hanif, Sahida Morris, Lorraine von Wagner, Christian J Med Screen Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ‘Call for a Kit’ health promotion intervention that was initiated in Lancashire, England to improve bowel cancer screening uptake. METHODS: Within the intervention, screening non-responders are called and invited to attend a consultation with a health promotion team member at their primary care practice. In this audit, we analysed the proportion of those contacted who attended the in-person clinic versus those who received a phone consultation, the number returning a test kit from in-person versus phone consultations, and the extent to which test kit return was moderated by sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: In 2019, 68 practices participated in the intervention which led to 10,772 individuals being contacted; 2464 accepted the invitation to an in-person consultation, of whom 1943 attended. A further 1065 agreed to and attended a consultation over the phone. The 3008 consultations resulted in 2890 test kits being ordered, of which 1608 (55.6%) were returned. The intervention therefore yielded a 14.9% response rate in the total cohort; 71.5% of test kits came from individuals attending the in-person consultation. Women and those registered with a practice in socioeconomically deprived areas were less likely to return the test kit. Individuals with a black, mixed or a non-Indian/Pakistani Asian ethnic background were significantly more likely to accept the offer of an in-person consultation and return the test kit. CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrated the strong likelihood of people returning a test kit after an in-person appointment but also the usefulness of using phone consultations as a safety net for people unable or unwilling to attend in-person clinics. SAGE Publications 2022-04-12 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9381688/ /pubmed/35410541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09691413221089184 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Stoffel, Sandro T McGregor, Lesley Hirst, Yasemin Hanif, Sahida Morris, Lorraine von Wagner, Christian Evaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, England |
title | Evaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, England |
title_full | Evaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, England |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, England |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, England |
title_short | Evaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, England |
title_sort | evaluation of the call for a kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in lancashire, england |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09691413221089184 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stoffelsandrot evaluationofthecallforakitinterventiontoincreasebowelcancerscreeninguptakeinlancashireengland AT mcgregorlesley evaluationofthecallforakitinterventiontoincreasebowelcancerscreeninguptakeinlancashireengland AT hirstyasemin evaluationofthecallforakitinterventiontoincreasebowelcancerscreeninguptakeinlancashireengland AT hanifsahida evaluationofthecallforakitinterventiontoincreasebowelcancerscreeninguptakeinlancashireengland AT morrislorraine evaluationofthecallforakitinterventiontoincreasebowelcancerscreeninguptakeinlancashireengland AT vonwagnerchristian evaluationofthecallforakitinterventiontoincreasebowelcancerscreeninguptakeinlancashireengland |