Cargando…

Evaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, England

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ‘Call for a Kit’ health promotion intervention that was initiated in Lancashire, England to improve bowel cancer screening uptake. METHODS: Within the intervention, screening non-responders are called and invited to attend a consultation with a health promotion team member...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stoffel, Sandro T, McGregor, Lesley, Hirst, Yasemin, Hanif, Sahida, Morris, Lorraine, von Wagner, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09691413221089184
_version_ 1784769128961146880
author Stoffel, Sandro T
McGregor, Lesley
Hirst, Yasemin
Hanif, Sahida
Morris, Lorraine
von Wagner, Christian
author_facet Stoffel, Sandro T
McGregor, Lesley
Hirst, Yasemin
Hanif, Sahida
Morris, Lorraine
von Wagner, Christian
author_sort Stoffel, Sandro T
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ‘Call for a Kit’ health promotion intervention that was initiated in Lancashire, England to improve bowel cancer screening uptake. METHODS: Within the intervention, screening non-responders are called and invited to attend a consultation with a health promotion team member at their primary care practice. In this audit, we analysed the proportion of those contacted who attended the in-person clinic versus those who received a phone consultation, the number returning a test kit from in-person versus phone consultations, and the extent to which test kit return was moderated by sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: In 2019, 68 practices participated in the intervention which led to 10,772 individuals being contacted; 2464 accepted the invitation to an in-person consultation, of whom 1943 attended. A further 1065 agreed to and attended a consultation over the phone. The 3008 consultations resulted in 2890 test kits being ordered, of which 1608 (55.6%) were returned. The intervention therefore yielded a 14.9% response rate in the total cohort; 71.5% of test kits came from individuals attending the in-person consultation. Women and those registered with a practice in socioeconomically deprived areas were less likely to return the test kit. Individuals with a black, mixed or a non-Indian/Pakistani Asian ethnic background were significantly more likely to accept the offer of an in-person consultation and return the test kit. CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrated the strong likelihood of people returning a test kit after an in-person appointment but also the usefulness of using phone consultations as a safety net for people unable or unwilling to attend in-person clinics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9381688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93816882022-08-18 Evaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, England Stoffel, Sandro T McGregor, Lesley Hirst, Yasemin Hanif, Sahida Morris, Lorraine von Wagner, Christian J Med Screen Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ‘Call for a Kit’ health promotion intervention that was initiated in Lancashire, England to improve bowel cancer screening uptake. METHODS: Within the intervention, screening non-responders are called and invited to attend a consultation with a health promotion team member at their primary care practice. In this audit, we analysed the proportion of those contacted who attended the in-person clinic versus those who received a phone consultation, the number returning a test kit from in-person versus phone consultations, and the extent to which test kit return was moderated by sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: In 2019, 68 practices participated in the intervention which led to 10,772 individuals being contacted; 2464 accepted the invitation to an in-person consultation, of whom 1943 attended. A further 1065 agreed to and attended a consultation over the phone. The 3008 consultations resulted in 2890 test kits being ordered, of which 1608 (55.6%) were returned. The intervention therefore yielded a 14.9% response rate in the total cohort; 71.5% of test kits came from individuals attending the in-person consultation. Women and those registered with a practice in socioeconomically deprived areas were less likely to return the test kit. Individuals with a black, mixed or a non-Indian/Pakistani Asian ethnic background were significantly more likely to accept the offer of an in-person consultation and return the test kit. CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrated the strong likelihood of people returning a test kit after an in-person appointment but also the usefulness of using phone consultations as a safety net for people unable or unwilling to attend in-person clinics. SAGE Publications 2022-04-12 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9381688/ /pubmed/35410541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09691413221089184 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Stoffel, Sandro T
McGregor, Lesley
Hirst, Yasemin
Hanif, Sahida
Morris, Lorraine
von Wagner, Christian
Evaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, England
title Evaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, England
title_full Evaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, England
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, England
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, England
title_short Evaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, England
title_sort evaluation of the call for a kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in lancashire, england
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09691413221089184
work_keys_str_mv AT stoffelsandrot evaluationofthecallforakitinterventiontoincreasebowelcancerscreeninguptakeinlancashireengland
AT mcgregorlesley evaluationofthecallforakitinterventiontoincreasebowelcancerscreeninguptakeinlancashireengland
AT hirstyasemin evaluationofthecallforakitinterventiontoincreasebowelcancerscreeninguptakeinlancashireengland
AT hanifsahida evaluationofthecallforakitinterventiontoincreasebowelcancerscreeninguptakeinlancashireengland
AT morrislorraine evaluationofthecallforakitinterventiontoincreasebowelcancerscreeninguptakeinlancashireengland
AT vonwagnerchristian evaluationofthecallforakitinterventiontoincreasebowelcancerscreeninguptakeinlancashireengland