Cargando…

Machine learning algorithms to estimate everolimus exposure trained on simulated and patient pharmacokinetic profiles

Everolimus is an immunosuppressant with a small therapeutic index and large between‐patient variability. The area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) is the best marker of exposure but measuring it requires collecting many blood samples. The objective of this study was to train machine l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Labriffe, Marc, Woillard, Jean‐Baptiste, Debord, Jean, Marquet, Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35599364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12810
_version_ 1784769181697179648
author Labriffe, Marc
Woillard, Jean‐Baptiste
Debord, Jean
Marquet, Pierre
author_facet Labriffe, Marc
Woillard, Jean‐Baptiste
Debord, Jean
Marquet, Pierre
author_sort Labriffe, Marc
collection PubMed
description Everolimus is an immunosuppressant with a small therapeutic index and large between‐patient variability. The area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) is the best marker of exposure but measuring it requires collecting many blood samples. The objective of this study was to train machine learning (ML) algorithms using pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles from kidney transplant recipients, simulated profiles, or both types, and compare their performance for everolimus AUC(0‐12h) estimation using a limited number of predictors, as compared to an independent set of full PK profiles from patients, as well as to the corresponding maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimates (MAP‐BE). XGBoost was first trained on 508 patient interdose AUCs estimated using MAP‐BE, and then on 500–10,000 rich interdose PK profiles simulated using previously published population PK parameters. The predictors used were: predose, ~1 h, and ~2 h whole blood concentrations, differences between these concentrations, relative deviations from theoretical sampling times, morning dose, patient age, and time elapsed since transplantation. The best results were obtained with XGBoost trained on 5016 simulated profiles. AUC estimation achieved in an external dataset of 114 full‐PK profiles was excellent (root mean squared error [RMSE] = 10.8 μg*h/L) and slightly better than MAP‐BE (RMSE = 11.9 μg*h/L). Using more profiles (n = 10,035) did not improve the ML algorithm performance. The contribution of mixing patient and simulated profiles was significant only when they were in balanced numbers, with ~500 for each (RMSE = 12.5 μg*h/L), compared with patient data alone (RMSE = 18.0 μg*h/L).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9381914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93819142022-08-19 Machine learning algorithms to estimate everolimus exposure trained on simulated and patient pharmacokinetic profiles Labriffe, Marc Woillard, Jean‐Baptiste Debord, Jean Marquet, Pierre CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Research Everolimus is an immunosuppressant with a small therapeutic index and large between‐patient variability. The area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) is the best marker of exposure but measuring it requires collecting many blood samples. The objective of this study was to train machine learning (ML) algorithms using pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles from kidney transplant recipients, simulated profiles, or both types, and compare their performance for everolimus AUC(0‐12h) estimation using a limited number of predictors, as compared to an independent set of full PK profiles from patients, as well as to the corresponding maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimates (MAP‐BE). XGBoost was first trained on 508 patient interdose AUCs estimated using MAP‐BE, and then on 500–10,000 rich interdose PK profiles simulated using previously published population PK parameters. The predictors used were: predose, ~1 h, and ~2 h whole blood concentrations, differences between these concentrations, relative deviations from theoretical sampling times, morning dose, patient age, and time elapsed since transplantation. The best results were obtained with XGBoost trained on 5016 simulated profiles. AUC estimation achieved in an external dataset of 114 full‐PK profiles was excellent (root mean squared error [RMSE] = 10.8 μg*h/L) and slightly better than MAP‐BE (RMSE = 11.9 μg*h/L). Using more profiles (n = 10,035) did not improve the ML algorithm performance. The contribution of mixing patient and simulated profiles was significant only when they were in balanced numbers, with ~500 for each (RMSE = 12.5 μg*h/L), compared with patient data alone (RMSE = 18.0 μg*h/L). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-22 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9381914/ /pubmed/35599364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12810 Text en © 2022 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research
Labriffe, Marc
Woillard, Jean‐Baptiste
Debord, Jean
Marquet, Pierre
Machine learning algorithms to estimate everolimus exposure trained on simulated and patient pharmacokinetic profiles
title Machine learning algorithms to estimate everolimus exposure trained on simulated and patient pharmacokinetic profiles
title_full Machine learning algorithms to estimate everolimus exposure trained on simulated and patient pharmacokinetic profiles
title_fullStr Machine learning algorithms to estimate everolimus exposure trained on simulated and patient pharmacokinetic profiles
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning algorithms to estimate everolimus exposure trained on simulated and patient pharmacokinetic profiles
title_short Machine learning algorithms to estimate everolimus exposure trained on simulated and patient pharmacokinetic profiles
title_sort machine learning algorithms to estimate everolimus exposure trained on simulated and patient pharmacokinetic profiles
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35599364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12810
work_keys_str_mv AT labriffemarc machinelearningalgorithmstoestimateeverolimusexposuretrainedonsimulatedandpatientpharmacokineticprofiles
AT woillardjeanbaptiste machinelearningalgorithmstoestimateeverolimusexposuretrainedonsimulatedandpatientpharmacokineticprofiles
AT debordjean machinelearningalgorithmstoestimateeverolimusexposuretrainedonsimulatedandpatientpharmacokineticprofiles
AT marquetpierre machinelearningalgorithmstoestimateeverolimusexposuretrainedonsimulatedandpatientpharmacokineticprofiles