Cargando…

Comparison of PKRP and TUVP in the treatment of high-risk BPH and analysis of postoperative influencing factors

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the efficacy of plasma kinetic loop resection of the prostate (PKRP) and transurethral vaporization of the prostate (TUVP) for the treatment of high-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and analyze the influence of the related factors on the operation of BPH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Yao, Pang, Songqiang, Luo, Gongtang, Li, Sen, He, Yaqiang, Yang, Jinqiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35990094
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.947027
_version_ 1784769192015167488
author Song, Yao
Pang, Songqiang
Luo, Gongtang
Li, Sen
He, Yaqiang
Yang, Jinqiang
author_facet Song, Yao
Pang, Songqiang
Luo, Gongtang
Li, Sen
He, Yaqiang
Yang, Jinqiang
author_sort Song, Yao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the efficacy of plasma kinetic loop resection of the prostate (PKRP) and transurethral vaporization of the prostate (TUVP) for the treatment of high-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and analyze the influence of the related factors on the operation of BPH. METHODS: A total of 108 high-risk BPH patients diagnosed in our hospital from March 2018 to September 2021 were selected and randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 54 cases in each group. The control group was treated with TUVP, and the observation group was treated with PKRP. The international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL) index, maximum urine flow rate (Qmax), and residual urine volume (RU) were observed before and after treatment. The general information such as age, educational level, residence, and residence status of the patient, as well as clinical information such as surgical method, nocturia frequency, preoperative IPSS score, RU, medical history, and prostate texture, were also recorded. All patients were followed up for 1 month, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: The IPSS score, QOL score, and RU of patients in the two groups were lower after treatment than those before treatment, and the Qmax was higher than that before treatment (P < 0.05). The IPSS score, QOL score, and RU of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the Qmax was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than in the control group (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis showed that the patient's age, surgical method, nocturia frequency, preoperative IPSS score, RU, medical history, and prostatic texture all could affect the postoperative condition of patients with BPH (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that the patient's age, surgical method, nocturia frequency, preoperative IPSS score, RU, and medical history were the independent influencing factors of the postoperative condition of patients with BPH (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PKRP in the treatment of high-risk BPH patients can effectively reduce the IPSS score, QOL score, and RU and significantly increase Qmax, with fewer complications and a good prognosis. Patients’ postoperative recovery was related to their age, surgical method, nocturia frequency, preoperative IPSS score, RU, and medical history. Therefore, choosing PKRP to treat high-risk BPH patients can effectively improve the postoperative urethral functional recovery of patients and reduce the occurrence of complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9381956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93819562022-08-18 Comparison of PKRP and TUVP in the treatment of high-risk BPH and analysis of postoperative influencing factors Song, Yao Pang, Songqiang Luo, Gongtang Li, Sen He, Yaqiang Yang, Jinqiang Front Surg Surgery OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the efficacy of plasma kinetic loop resection of the prostate (PKRP) and transurethral vaporization of the prostate (TUVP) for the treatment of high-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and analyze the influence of the related factors on the operation of BPH. METHODS: A total of 108 high-risk BPH patients diagnosed in our hospital from March 2018 to September 2021 were selected and randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 54 cases in each group. The control group was treated with TUVP, and the observation group was treated with PKRP. The international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL) index, maximum urine flow rate (Qmax), and residual urine volume (RU) were observed before and after treatment. The general information such as age, educational level, residence, and residence status of the patient, as well as clinical information such as surgical method, nocturia frequency, preoperative IPSS score, RU, medical history, and prostate texture, were also recorded. All patients were followed up for 1 month, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: The IPSS score, QOL score, and RU of patients in the two groups were lower after treatment than those before treatment, and the Qmax was higher than that before treatment (P < 0.05). The IPSS score, QOL score, and RU of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the Qmax was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than in the control group (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis showed that the patient's age, surgical method, nocturia frequency, preoperative IPSS score, RU, medical history, and prostatic texture all could affect the postoperative condition of patients with BPH (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that the patient's age, surgical method, nocturia frequency, preoperative IPSS score, RU, and medical history were the independent influencing factors of the postoperative condition of patients with BPH (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PKRP in the treatment of high-risk BPH patients can effectively reduce the IPSS score, QOL score, and RU and significantly increase Qmax, with fewer complications and a good prognosis. Patients’ postoperative recovery was related to their age, surgical method, nocturia frequency, preoperative IPSS score, RU, and medical history. Therefore, choosing PKRP to treat high-risk BPH patients can effectively improve the postoperative urethral functional recovery of patients and reduce the occurrence of complications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9381956/ /pubmed/35990094 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.947027 Text en © 2022 Song, Pang, Luo, Li, He and Yang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Song, Yao
Pang, Songqiang
Luo, Gongtang
Li, Sen
He, Yaqiang
Yang, Jinqiang
Comparison of PKRP and TUVP in the treatment of high-risk BPH and analysis of postoperative influencing factors
title Comparison of PKRP and TUVP in the treatment of high-risk BPH and analysis of postoperative influencing factors
title_full Comparison of PKRP and TUVP in the treatment of high-risk BPH and analysis of postoperative influencing factors
title_fullStr Comparison of PKRP and TUVP in the treatment of high-risk BPH and analysis of postoperative influencing factors
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of PKRP and TUVP in the treatment of high-risk BPH and analysis of postoperative influencing factors
title_short Comparison of PKRP and TUVP in the treatment of high-risk BPH and analysis of postoperative influencing factors
title_sort comparison of pkrp and tuvp in the treatment of high-risk bph and analysis of postoperative influencing factors
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9381956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35990094
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.947027
work_keys_str_mv AT songyao comparisonofpkrpandtuvpinthetreatmentofhighriskbphandanalysisofpostoperativeinfluencingfactors
AT pangsongqiang comparisonofpkrpandtuvpinthetreatmentofhighriskbphandanalysisofpostoperativeinfluencingfactors
AT luogongtang comparisonofpkrpandtuvpinthetreatmentofhighriskbphandanalysisofpostoperativeinfluencingfactors
AT lisen comparisonofpkrpandtuvpinthetreatmentofhighriskbphandanalysisofpostoperativeinfluencingfactors
AT heyaqiang comparisonofpkrpandtuvpinthetreatmentofhighriskbphandanalysisofpostoperativeinfluencingfactors
AT yangjinqiang comparisonofpkrpandtuvpinthetreatmentofhighriskbphandanalysisofpostoperativeinfluencingfactors