Cargando…

The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study

OBJECTIVES: Complete cleaning of temporary cement before permanent cementation of cement‐retained implant‐supported prosthesis (CISP) when recementing the crown is critical. This study evaluated the effect of different cleaning methods for removing traces of temporary cement on the final tensile bon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ebadian, Behnaz, Jowkar, Mohammad, Davoudi, Amin, Fathi, Amirhossein, Ziaei, Mohsen, Berg, Einar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35618682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.593
_version_ 1784769213066379264
author Ebadian, Behnaz
Jowkar, Mohammad
Davoudi, Amin
Fathi, Amirhossein
Ziaei, Mohsen
Berg, Einar
author_facet Ebadian, Behnaz
Jowkar, Mohammad
Davoudi, Amin
Fathi, Amirhossein
Ziaei, Mohsen
Berg, Einar
author_sort Ebadian, Behnaz
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Complete cleaning of temporary cement before permanent cementation of cement‐retained implant‐supported prosthesis (CISP) when recementing the crown is critical. This study evaluated the effect of different cleaning methods for removing traces of temporary cement on the final tensile bond force (TBF) of CISP recemented with resin cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing metal implant‐supported copings were prepared and distributed into seven groups (N = 10). Copings of six groups (60 samples) were cemented with temporary cement with eugenol and subjected to 5000 thermocycling. After debonding by a universal testing machine, the internal surfaces of the copings were cleaned using one of the six following methods: 1‐an ultrasonic water bath (UW), 2‐sandblasting, then washing with water (SW), 3‐sandblasting and an ultrasonic water bath (SUW), 4‐an ultrasonic isopropyl alcohol bath (UA), 5‐sandblasting, then washing with isopropyl alcohol (SA) or 6‐sandblasting and an ultrasonic isopropyl alcohol bath (SUA). Then the subjects were subsequently cemented by dual‐cure self‐adhesive resin cement. In the seventh group (control, N = 10), the copings were cemented by dual‐cure self‐adhesive resin cement without the temporization phase. The TBF was tested using a universal testing machine with a cross‐head speed of 1 mm/min. Two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post‐hoc Tamhane tests were used for statistical analysis at a significance level of α = .05. RESULTS: The maximum mean of TBF value was observed in SUA group (845 ± 203 N), and the minimum was observed in the temporary cement group (49 ± 20 N). All groups which were cleaned with isopropyl alcohol showed significantly higher TBF values compared with those cleaned with water. CONCLUSIONS: Cleaning of the inner surface of metal copings after debonding with sandblasting and isopropyl alcohol results in the highest value of TBF by eliminating the effect of remaining eugenol and removing traces of temporary cements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9382040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93820402022-08-19 The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study Ebadian, Behnaz Jowkar, Mohammad Davoudi, Amin Fathi, Amirhossein Ziaei, Mohsen Berg, Einar Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Complete cleaning of temporary cement before permanent cementation of cement‐retained implant‐supported prosthesis (CISP) when recementing the crown is critical. This study evaluated the effect of different cleaning methods for removing traces of temporary cement on the final tensile bond force (TBF) of CISP recemented with resin cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing metal implant‐supported copings were prepared and distributed into seven groups (N = 10). Copings of six groups (60 samples) were cemented with temporary cement with eugenol and subjected to 5000 thermocycling. After debonding by a universal testing machine, the internal surfaces of the copings were cleaned using one of the six following methods: 1‐an ultrasonic water bath (UW), 2‐sandblasting, then washing with water (SW), 3‐sandblasting and an ultrasonic water bath (SUW), 4‐an ultrasonic isopropyl alcohol bath (UA), 5‐sandblasting, then washing with isopropyl alcohol (SA) or 6‐sandblasting and an ultrasonic isopropyl alcohol bath (SUA). Then the subjects were subsequently cemented by dual‐cure self‐adhesive resin cement. In the seventh group (control, N = 10), the copings were cemented by dual‐cure self‐adhesive resin cement without the temporization phase. The TBF was tested using a universal testing machine with a cross‐head speed of 1 mm/min. Two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post‐hoc Tamhane tests were used for statistical analysis at a significance level of α = .05. RESULTS: The maximum mean of TBF value was observed in SUA group (845 ± 203 N), and the minimum was observed in the temporary cement group (49 ± 20 N). All groups which were cleaned with isopropyl alcohol showed significantly higher TBF values compared with those cleaned with water. CONCLUSIONS: Cleaning of the inner surface of metal copings after debonding with sandblasting and isopropyl alcohol results in the highest value of TBF by eliminating the effect of remaining eugenol and removing traces of temporary cements. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9382040/ /pubmed/35618682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.593 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ebadian, Behnaz
Jowkar, Mohammad
Davoudi, Amin
Fathi, Amirhossein
Ziaei, Mohsen
Berg, Einar
The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study
title The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study
title_full The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study
title_fullStr The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study
title_short The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study
title_sort effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: an in vitro study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35618682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.593
work_keys_str_mv AT ebadianbehnaz theeffectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT jowkarmohammad theeffectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT davoudiamin theeffectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT fathiamirhossein theeffectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT ziaeimohsen theeffectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT bergeinar theeffectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT ebadianbehnaz effectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT jowkarmohammad effectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT davoudiamin effectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT fathiamirhossein effectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT ziaeimohsen effectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT bergeinar effectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy