Cargando…

Intercalary reconstruction of long bones by massive allograft: Comparison of construct stability ensured by three different host-graft junctions and two types of fixations in a synthetic femur model

An intercalary segmental allograft is an option for limb salvage in bone tumours. Stable and congruent intercalary reconstructions are a prerequisite for achieving host-graft union. However, a too rigid fixation could increase the risk of late complications correlated with negative bone remodelling....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baleani, Massimiliano, Erani, Paolo, Blaise, Manon, Fognani, Roberta, Palmas, Marco, Manfrini, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35989989
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.868299
_version_ 1784769238260514816
author Baleani, Massimiliano
Erani, Paolo
Blaise, Manon
Fognani, Roberta
Palmas, Marco
Manfrini, Marco
author_facet Baleani, Massimiliano
Erani, Paolo
Blaise, Manon
Fognani, Roberta
Palmas, Marco
Manfrini, Marco
author_sort Baleani, Massimiliano
collection PubMed
description An intercalary segmental allograft is an option for limb salvage in bone tumours. Stable and congruent intercalary reconstructions are a prerequisite for achieving host-graft union. However, a too rigid fixation could increase the risk of late complications correlated with negative bone remodelling. This study compared the reconstruction stiffness achieved by three different host-graft junctions, namely, end-to-end, modified step-cut, and taper. A low-stiffness bone plate was used as the fixation method, except for the taper junction where a low-stiffness intramedullary nail was also used to investigate the effects of different types of fixation on construct stiffness. Composite femora were tested under four loading conditions to determine coronal and sagittal bending stiffness, as well as torsional stiffness in opposite directions. Stiffness values were expressed as a percentage of intact host bone stiffness (%IBS). While a reduction of coronal bending stiffness was found with taper junctions (76%IBS) compared with the high values ensured by end-to-end (96%IBS) and modified step-cut junctions (92%IBS), taper junctions significantly increased stiffness under sagittal bending and torsion in intra- and extra-direction: end-to-end 29%IBS, 7%IBS, 7%IBS, modified step-cut 38%IBS, 20%IBS, 21%IBS, and taper junction 52%IBS, 55%IBS, 56%IBS, respectively. Construct stiffness with taper junctions was decreased by 11–41%IBS by replacing the bone plate with an intramedullary nail. Taper junctions can be an alternative to achieve intercalary reconstructions with more homogeneous and, in three out of four loading conditions, significantly higher construct stability without increasing bone plate stiffness. The risk of instability under high torsional loads increases when taper junctions are associated with a low-stiffness intramedullary nail.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9382195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93821952022-08-18 Intercalary reconstruction of long bones by massive allograft: Comparison of construct stability ensured by three different host-graft junctions and two types of fixations in a synthetic femur model Baleani, Massimiliano Erani, Paolo Blaise, Manon Fognani, Roberta Palmas, Marco Manfrini, Marco Front Pediatr Pediatrics An intercalary segmental allograft is an option for limb salvage in bone tumours. Stable and congruent intercalary reconstructions are a prerequisite for achieving host-graft union. However, a too rigid fixation could increase the risk of late complications correlated with negative bone remodelling. This study compared the reconstruction stiffness achieved by three different host-graft junctions, namely, end-to-end, modified step-cut, and taper. A low-stiffness bone plate was used as the fixation method, except for the taper junction where a low-stiffness intramedullary nail was also used to investigate the effects of different types of fixation on construct stiffness. Composite femora were tested under four loading conditions to determine coronal and sagittal bending stiffness, as well as torsional stiffness in opposite directions. Stiffness values were expressed as a percentage of intact host bone stiffness (%IBS). While a reduction of coronal bending stiffness was found with taper junctions (76%IBS) compared with the high values ensured by end-to-end (96%IBS) and modified step-cut junctions (92%IBS), taper junctions significantly increased stiffness under sagittal bending and torsion in intra- and extra-direction: end-to-end 29%IBS, 7%IBS, 7%IBS, modified step-cut 38%IBS, 20%IBS, 21%IBS, and taper junction 52%IBS, 55%IBS, 56%IBS, respectively. Construct stiffness with taper junctions was decreased by 11–41%IBS by replacing the bone plate with an intramedullary nail. Taper junctions can be an alternative to achieve intercalary reconstructions with more homogeneous and, in three out of four loading conditions, significantly higher construct stability without increasing bone plate stiffness. The risk of instability under high torsional loads increases when taper junctions are associated with a low-stiffness intramedullary nail. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9382195/ /pubmed/35989989 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.868299 Text en Copyright © 2022 Baleani, Erani, Blaise, Fognani, Palmas and Manfrini. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Baleani, Massimiliano
Erani, Paolo
Blaise, Manon
Fognani, Roberta
Palmas, Marco
Manfrini, Marco
Intercalary reconstruction of long bones by massive allograft: Comparison of construct stability ensured by three different host-graft junctions and two types of fixations in a synthetic femur model
title Intercalary reconstruction of long bones by massive allograft: Comparison of construct stability ensured by three different host-graft junctions and two types of fixations in a synthetic femur model
title_full Intercalary reconstruction of long bones by massive allograft: Comparison of construct stability ensured by three different host-graft junctions and two types of fixations in a synthetic femur model
title_fullStr Intercalary reconstruction of long bones by massive allograft: Comparison of construct stability ensured by three different host-graft junctions and two types of fixations in a synthetic femur model
title_full_unstemmed Intercalary reconstruction of long bones by massive allograft: Comparison of construct stability ensured by three different host-graft junctions and two types of fixations in a synthetic femur model
title_short Intercalary reconstruction of long bones by massive allograft: Comparison of construct stability ensured by three different host-graft junctions and two types of fixations in a synthetic femur model
title_sort intercalary reconstruction of long bones by massive allograft: comparison of construct stability ensured by three different host-graft junctions and two types of fixations in a synthetic femur model
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35989989
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.868299
work_keys_str_mv AT baleanimassimiliano intercalaryreconstructionoflongbonesbymassiveallograftcomparisonofconstructstabilityensuredbythreedifferenthostgraftjunctionsandtwotypesoffixationsinasyntheticfemurmodel
AT eranipaolo intercalaryreconstructionoflongbonesbymassiveallograftcomparisonofconstructstabilityensuredbythreedifferenthostgraftjunctionsandtwotypesoffixationsinasyntheticfemurmodel
AT blaisemanon intercalaryreconstructionoflongbonesbymassiveallograftcomparisonofconstructstabilityensuredbythreedifferenthostgraftjunctionsandtwotypesoffixationsinasyntheticfemurmodel
AT fognaniroberta intercalaryreconstructionoflongbonesbymassiveallograftcomparisonofconstructstabilityensuredbythreedifferenthostgraftjunctionsandtwotypesoffixationsinasyntheticfemurmodel
AT palmasmarco intercalaryreconstructionoflongbonesbymassiveallograftcomparisonofconstructstabilityensuredbythreedifferenthostgraftjunctionsandtwotypesoffixationsinasyntheticfemurmodel
AT manfrinimarco intercalaryreconstructionoflongbonesbymassiveallograftcomparisonofconstructstabilityensuredbythreedifferenthostgraftjunctionsandtwotypesoffixationsinasyntheticfemurmodel