Cargando…
Mechanisms of damage prevention, signalling and repair impact disease tolerance
The insect gut is frequently exposed to pathogenic threats and must not only clear these potential infections, but also tolerate relatively high microbe loads. In contrast to the mechanisms that eliminate pathogens, we currently know less about the mechanisms of disease tolerance. We investigated ho...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35975433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.0837 |
_version_ | 1784769242085720064 |
---|---|
author | Prakash, Arun Monteith, Katy M. Vale, Pedro F. |
author_facet | Prakash, Arun Monteith, Katy M. Vale, Pedro F. |
author_sort | Prakash, Arun |
collection | PubMed |
description | The insect gut is frequently exposed to pathogenic threats and must not only clear these potential infections, but also tolerate relatively high microbe loads. In contrast to the mechanisms that eliminate pathogens, we currently know less about the mechanisms of disease tolerance. We investigated how well-described mechanisms that prevent, signal, control or repair damage during infection contribute to the phenotype of disease tolerance. We established enteric infections with the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas entomophila in transgenic lines of Drosophila melanogaster fruit flies affecting dcy (a major component of the peritrophic matrix), upd3 (a cytokine-like molecule), irc (a negative regulator of reactive oxygen species) and egfr(1) (epithelial growth factor receptor). Flies lacking dcy experienced the highest mortality, while loss of function of either irc or upd3 reduced tolerance in both sexes. The disruption of egfr(1) resulted in a severe loss in tolerance in male flies but had no substantial effect on the ability of female flies to tolerate P. entomophila infection, despite carrying greater microbe loads than males. Together, our findings provide evidence for the role of damage limitation mechanisms in disease tolerance and highlight how sexual dimorphism in these mechanisms could generate sex differences in infection outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9382215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93822152022-08-29 Mechanisms of damage prevention, signalling and repair impact disease tolerance Prakash, Arun Monteith, Katy M. Vale, Pedro F. Proc Biol Sci Development and Physiology The insect gut is frequently exposed to pathogenic threats and must not only clear these potential infections, but also tolerate relatively high microbe loads. In contrast to the mechanisms that eliminate pathogens, we currently know less about the mechanisms of disease tolerance. We investigated how well-described mechanisms that prevent, signal, control or repair damage during infection contribute to the phenotype of disease tolerance. We established enteric infections with the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas entomophila in transgenic lines of Drosophila melanogaster fruit flies affecting dcy (a major component of the peritrophic matrix), upd3 (a cytokine-like molecule), irc (a negative regulator of reactive oxygen species) and egfr(1) (epithelial growth factor receptor). Flies lacking dcy experienced the highest mortality, while loss of function of either irc or upd3 reduced tolerance in both sexes. The disruption of egfr(1) resulted in a severe loss in tolerance in male flies but had no substantial effect on the ability of female flies to tolerate P. entomophila infection, despite carrying greater microbe loads than males. Together, our findings provide evidence for the role of damage limitation mechanisms in disease tolerance and highlight how sexual dimorphism in these mechanisms could generate sex differences in infection outcomes. The Royal Society 2022-08-31 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9382215/ /pubmed/35975433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.0837 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Development and Physiology Prakash, Arun Monteith, Katy M. Vale, Pedro F. Mechanisms of damage prevention, signalling and repair impact disease tolerance |
title | Mechanisms of damage prevention, signalling and repair impact disease tolerance |
title_full | Mechanisms of damage prevention, signalling and repair impact disease tolerance |
title_fullStr | Mechanisms of damage prevention, signalling and repair impact disease tolerance |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanisms of damage prevention, signalling and repair impact disease tolerance |
title_short | Mechanisms of damage prevention, signalling and repair impact disease tolerance |
title_sort | mechanisms of damage prevention, signalling and repair impact disease tolerance |
topic | Development and Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35975433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.0837 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prakasharun mechanismsofdamagepreventionsignallingandrepairimpactdiseasetolerance AT monteithkatym mechanismsofdamagepreventionsignallingandrepairimpactdiseasetolerance AT valepedrof mechanismsofdamagepreventionsignallingandrepairimpactdiseasetolerance |