Cargando…
Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences
Citation data and journal impact factors are important components of faculty dossiers and figure prominently in both promotion decisions and assessments of a researcher’s broader societal impact. Although these metrics play a large role in high-stakes decisions, the evidence is mixed about whether t...
Autores principales: | Dougherty, Michael R., Horne, Zachary |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35991336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220334 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Fifty years of research on questionable research practises in science: quantitative analysis of co-citation patterns
por: Neoh, Michelle Jin Yee, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
What do participants think of our research practices? An examination of behavioural psychology participants' preferences
por: Bottesini, Julia G., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study
por: Hardwicke, Tom E., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Altimetric, bibliometrics, citation indices, download counts, Eigen factor - The ABCDE science of research and publication
por: Gurnani, Bharat, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
When numbers fail: do researchers agree on operationalization of published research?
por: Haucke, Matthias, et al.
Publicado: (2021)