Cargando…

Human circadian rhythm studies: Practical guidelines for inclusion/exclusion criteria and protocol

As interest in circadian rhythms and their effects continues to grow, there is an increasing need to perform circadian studies in humans. Although the constant routine is the gold standard for these studies, there are advantages to performing more naturalistic studies. Here, a review of protocols fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yousefzadehfard, Yashar, Wechsler, Bennett, DeLorenzo, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35989718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbscr.2022.100080
_version_ 1784769264017735680
author Yousefzadehfard, Yashar
Wechsler, Bennett
DeLorenzo, Christine
author_facet Yousefzadehfard, Yashar
Wechsler, Bennett
DeLorenzo, Christine
author_sort Yousefzadehfard, Yashar
collection PubMed
description As interest in circadian rhythms and their effects continues to grow, there is an increasing need to perform circadian studies in humans. Although the constant routine is the gold standard for these studies, there are advantages to performing more naturalistic studies. Here, a review of protocols for such studies is provided along with sample inclusion and exclusion criteria. Sleep routines, drug use, shift work, and menstrual cycle are addressed as screening considerations. Regarding protocol, best practices for measuring melatonin, including light settings, posture, exercise, and dietary habits are described. The inclusion/exclusion recommendations and protocol guidelines are intended to reduce confounding variables in studies that do not involve the constant routine. Given practical limitations, a range of recommendations is provided from stringent to lenient. The scientific rationale behind these recommendations is discussed. However, where the science is equivocal, recommendations are based on empirical decisions made in previous studies. While not all of the recommendations listed may be practical in all research settings and with limited potential participants, the goal is to allow investigators to make well informed decisions about their screening procedures and protocol techniques and to improve rigor and reproducibility, in line with the objectives of the National Institutes of Health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9382328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93823282022-08-18 Human circadian rhythm studies: Practical guidelines for inclusion/exclusion criteria and protocol Yousefzadehfard, Yashar Wechsler, Bennett DeLorenzo, Christine Neurobiol Sleep Circadian Rhythms Review Article As interest in circadian rhythms and their effects continues to grow, there is an increasing need to perform circadian studies in humans. Although the constant routine is the gold standard for these studies, there are advantages to performing more naturalistic studies. Here, a review of protocols for such studies is provided along with sample inclusion and exclusion criteria. Sleep routines, drug use, shift work, and menstrual cycle are addressed as screening considerations. Regarding protocol, best practices for measuring melatonin, including light settings, posture, exercise, and dietary habits are described. The inclusion/exclusion recommendations and protocol guidelines are intended to reduce confounding variables in studies that do not involve the constant routine. Given practical limitations, a range of recommendations is provided from stringent to lenient. The scientific rationale behind these recommendations is discussed. However, where the science is equivocal, recommendations are based on empirical decisions made in previous studies. While not all of the recommendations listed may be practical in all research settings and with limited potential participants, the goal is to allow investigators to make well informed decisions about their screening procedures and protocol techniques and to improve rigor and reproducibility, in line with the objectives of the National Institutes of Health. Elsevier 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9382328/ /pubmed/35989718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbscr.2022.100080 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Yousefzadehfard, Yashar
Wechsler, Bennett
DeLorenzo, Christine
Human circadian rhythm studies: Practical guidelines for inclusion/exclusion criteria and protocol
title Human circadian rhythm studies: Practical guidelines for inclusion/exclusion criteria and protocol
title_full Human circadian rhythm studies: Practical guidelines for inclusion/exclusion criteria and protocol
title_fullStr Human circadian rhythm studies: Practical guidelines for inclusion/exclusion criteria and protocol
title_full_unstemmed Human circadian rhythm studies: Practical guidelines for inclusion/exclusion criteria and protocol
title_short Human circadian rhythm studies: Practical guidelines for inclusion/exclusion criteria and protocol
title_sort human circadian rhythm studies: practical guidelines for inclusion/exclusion criteria and protocol
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35989718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbscr.2022.100080
work_keys_str_mv AT yousefzadehfardyashar humancircadianrhythmstudiespracticalguidelinesforinclusionexclusioncriteriaandprotocol
AT wechslerbennett humancircadianrhythmstudiespracticalguidelinesforinclusionexclusioncriteriaandprotocol
AT delorenzochristine humancircadianrhythmstudiespracticalguidelinesforinclusionexclusioncriteriaandprotocol