Cargando…
Human circadian rhythm studies: Practical guidelines for inclusion/exclusion criteria and protocol
As interest in circadian rhythms and their effects continues to grow, there is an increasing need to perform circadian studies in humans. Although the constant routine is the gold standard for these studies, there are advantages to performing more naturalistic studies. Here, a review of protocols fo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35989718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbscr.2022.100080 |
_version_ | 1784769264017735680 |
---|---|
author | Yousefzadehfard, Yashar Wechsler, Bennett DeLorenzo, Christine |
author_facet | Yousefzadehfard, Yashar Wechsler, Bennett DeLorenzo, Christine |
author_sort | Yousefzadehfard, Yashar |
collection | PubMed |
description | As interest in circadian rhythms and their effects continues to grow, there is an increasing need to perform circadian studies in humans. Although the constant routine is the gold standard for these studies, there are advantages to performing more naturalistic studies. Here, a review of protocols for such studies is provided along with sample inclusion and exclusion criteria. Sleep routines, drug use, shift work, and menstrual cycle are addressed as screening considerations. Regarding protocol, best practices for measuring melatonin, including light settings, posture, exercise, and dietary habits are described. The inclusion/exclusion recommendations and protocol guidelines are intended to reduce confounding variables in studies that do not involve the constant routine. Given practical limitations, a range of recommendations is provided from stringent to lenient. The scientific rationale behind these recommendations is discussed. However, where the science is equivocal, recommendations are based on empirical decisions made in previous studies. While not all of the recommendations listed may be practical in all research settings and with limited potential participants, the goal is to allow investigators to make well informed decisions about their screening procedures and protocol techniques and to improve rigor and reproducibility, in line with the objectives of the National Institutes of Health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9382328 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93823282022-08-18 Human circadian rhythm studies: Practical guidelines for inclusion/exclusion criteria and protocol Yousefzadehfard, Yashar Wechsler, Bennett DeLorenzo, Christine Neurobiol Sleep Circadian Rhythms Review Article As interest in circadian rhythms and their effects continues to grow, there is an increasing need to perform circadian studies in humans. Although the constant routine is the gold standard for these studies, there are advantages to performing more naturalistic studies. Here, a review of protocols for such studies is provided along with sample inclusion and exclusion criteria. Sleep routines, drug use, shift work, and menstrual cycle are addressed as screening considerations. Regarding protocol, best practices for measuring melatonin, including light settings, posture, exercise, and dietary habits are described. The inclusion/exclusion recommendations and protocol guidelines are intended to reduce confounding variables in studies that do not involve the constant routine. Given practical limitations, a range of recommendations is provided from stringent to lenient. The scientific rationale behind these recommendations is discussed. However, where the science is equivocal, recommendations are based on empirical decisions made in previous studies. While not all of the recommendations listed may be practical in all research settings and with limited potential participants, the goal is to allow investigators to make well informed decisions about their screening procedures and protocol techniques and to improve rigor and reproducibility, in line with the objectives of the National Institutes of Health. Elsevier 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9382328/ /pubmed/35989718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbscr.2022.100080 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Yousefzadehfard, Yashar Wechsler, Bennett DeLorenzo, Christine Human circadian rhythm studies: Practical guidelines for inclusion/exclusion criteria and protocol |
title | Human circadian rhythm studies: Practical guidelines for inclusion/exclusion criteria and protocol |
title_full | Human circadian rhythm studies: Practical guidelines for inclusion/exclusion criteria and protocol |
title_fullStr | Human circadian rhythm studies: Practical guidelines for inclusion/exclusion criteria and protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Human circadian rhythm studies: Practical guidelines for inclusion/exclusion criteria and protocol |
title_short | Human circadian rhythm studies: Practical guidelines for inclusion/exclusion criteria and protocol |
title_sort | human circadian rhythm studies: practical guidelines for inclusion/exclusion criteria and protocol |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35989718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbscr.2022.100080 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yousefzadehfardyashar humancircadianrhythmstudiespracticalguidelinesforinclusionexclusioncriteriaandprotocol AT wechslerbennett humancircadianrhythmstudiespracticalguidelinesforinclusionexclusioncriteriaandprotocol AT delorenzochristine humancircadianrhythmstudiespracticalguidelinesforinclusionexclusioncriteriaandprotocol |