Cargando…

Nonoperative versus operative approach according to the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: A prospective cohort study

PURPOSE: To report on organ preservation following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in a prospective cohort of locally advanced rectal cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-two patients received CRT. MRI and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT were performed prior to CRT. Response assessment was done 6 and 12 weeks aft...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bulens, Philippe P., Smets, Lien, Debucquoy, Annelies, Joye, Ines, D'Hoore, André, Wolthuis, Albert, Debrun, Lynn, Dekervel, Jeroen, Van Cutsem, Eric, Dresen, Raphaëla, Vandecaveye, Vincent, Deroose, Christophe M., Sagaert, Xavier, Haustermans, Karin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35993092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.07.009
_version_ 1784769270851305472
author Bulens, Philippe P.
Smets, Lien
Debucquoy, Annelies
Joye, Ines
D'Hoore, André
Wolthuis, Albert
Debrun, Lynn
Dekervel, Jeroen
Van Cutsem, Eric
Dresen, Raphaëla
Vandecaveye, Vincent
Deroose, Christophe M.
Sagaert, Xavier
Haustermans, Karin
author_facet Bulens, Philippe P.
Smets, Lien
Debucquoy, Annelies
Joye, Ines
D'Hoore, André
Wolthuis, Albert
Debrun, Lynn
Dekervel, Jeroen
Van Cutsem, Eric
Dresen, Raphaëla
Vandecaveye, Vincent
Deroose, Christophe M.
Sagaert, Xavier
Haustermans, Karin
author_sort Bulens, Philippe P.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To report on organ preservation following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in a prospective cohort of locally advanced rectal cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-two patients received CRT. MRI and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT were performed prior to CRT. Response assessment was done 6 and 12 weeks after CRT using digital rectal examination, MRI, (18)F-FDG-PET/CT and endoscopy. For clinical complete response or minimal residual disease, a watch-and-wait (W&W) protocol was started. Regrowth-free survival (ReFS), Total Mesorectal Excision-free disease-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method. Functional outcome was compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test using EORTC QLQ-C30, MSKCC BFI, LARS and IIEF-5/FSFI-5 questionnaires. A previously developed prediction model performance was tested using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: 29/52 patients entered a W&W protocol. There was no difference in two-year DMFS (81.1 % vs 78.8 %, p = 0.82), two-year OS (96.4 % vs 100 %, p = 0.38) and two-year DFS (77.5 % vs 78.8 %, p = 0.87) between W&W patients and those who underwent surgery at 12 weeks after CRT. Two-year DMFS differed between W&W with local regrowth, W&W with sustained response and patients who had surgery (66.7 % vs 88.0 % vs 78.8 %; p = 0.04). At 6 and 12 months, W&W patients reported good QoL and bowel function. The model validation reached an AUC of 0.627. CONCLUSION: Good functional outcome in patients with rectal cancer allocated to surveillance after CRT needs to be balanced against potentially worse DMFS in a subset of patients without sustained clinical complete response. Reliable prediction of patients eligible for surveillance programs needs further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9382364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93823642022-08-18 Nonoperative versus operative approach according to the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: A prospective cohort study Bulens, Philippe P. Smets, Lien Debucquoy, Annelies Joye, Ines D'Hoore, André Wolthuis, Albert Debrun, Lynn Dekervel, Jeroen Van Cutsem, Eric Dresen, Raphaëla Vandecaveye, Vincent Deroose, Christophe M. Sagaert, Xavier Haustermans, Karin Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Original Research Article PURPOSE: To report on organ preservation following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in a prospective cohort of locally advanced rectal cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-two patients received CRT. MRI and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT were performed prior to CRT. Response assessment was done 6 and 12 weeks after CRT using digital rectal examination, MRI, (18)F-FDG-PET/CT and endoscopy. For clinical complete response or minimal residual disease, a watch-and-wait (W&W) protocol was started. Regrowth-free survival (ReFS), Total Mesorectal Excision-free disease-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method. Functional outcome was compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test using EORTC QLQ-C30, MSKCC BFI, LARS and IIEF-5/FSFI-5 questionnaires. A previously developed prediction model performance was tested using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: 29/52 patients entered a W&W protocol. There was no difference in two-year DMFS (81.1 % vs 78.8 %, p = 0.82), two-year OS (96.4 % vs 100 %, p = 0.38) and two-year DFS (77.5 % vs 78.8 %, p = 0.87) between W&W patients and those who underwent surgery at 12 weeks after CRT. Two-year DMFS differed between W&W with local regrowth, W&W with sustained response and patients who had surgery (66.7 % vs 88.0 % vs 78.8 %; p = 0.04). At 6 and 12 months, W&W patients reported good QoL and bowel function. The model validation reached an AUC of 0.627. CONCLUSION: Good functional outcome in patients with rectal cancer allocated to surveillance after CRT needs to be balanced against potentially worse DMFS in a subset of patients without sustained clinical complete response. Reliable prediction of patients eligible for surveillance programs needs further investigation. Elsevier 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9382364/ /pubmed/35993092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.07.009 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Bulens, Philippe P.
Smets, Lien
Debucquoy, Annelies
Joye, Ines
D'Hoore, André
Wolthuis, Albert
Debrun, Lynn
Dekervel, Jeroen
Van Cutsem, Eric
Dresen, Raphaëla
Vandecaveye, Vincent
Deroose, Christophe M.
Sagaert, Xavier
Haustermans, Karin
Nonoperative versus operative approach according to the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: A prospective cohort study
title Nonoperative versus operative approach according to the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: A prospective cohort study
title_full Nonoperative versus operative approach according to the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: A prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Nonoperative versus operative approach according to the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: A prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Nonoperative versus operative approach according to the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: A prospective cohort study
title_short Nonoperative versus operative approach according to the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: A prospective cohort study
title_sort nonoperative versus operative approach according to the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35993092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.07.009
work_keys_str_mv AT bulensphilippep nonoperativeversusoperativeapproachaccordingtotheresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyforrectalcanceraprospectivecohortstudy
AT smetslien nonoperativeversusoperativeapproachaccordingtotheresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyforrectalcanceraprospectivecohortstudy
AT debucquoyannelies nonoperativeversusoperativeapproachaccordingtotheresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyforrectalcanceraprospectivecohortstudy
AT joyeines nonoperativeversusoperativeapproachaccordingtotheresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyforrectalcanceraprospectivecohortstudy
AT dhooreandre nonoperativeversusoperativeapproachaccordingtotheresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyforrectalcanceraprospectivecohortstudy
AT wolthuisalbert nonoperativeversusoperativeapproachaccordingtotheresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyforrectalcanceraprospectivecohortstudy
AT debrunlynn nonoperativeversusoperativeapproachaccordingtotheresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyforrectalcanceraprospectivecohortstudy
AT dekerveljeroen nonoperativeversusoperativeapproachaccordingtotheresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyforrectalcanceraprospectivecohortstudy
AT vancutsemeric nonoperativeversusoperativeapproachaccordingtotheresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyforrectalcanceraprospectivecohortstudy
AT dresenraphaela nonoperativeversusoperativeapproachaccordingtotheresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyforrectalcanceraprospectivecohortstudy
AT vandecaveyevincent nonoperativeversusoperativeapproachaccordingtotheresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyforrectalcanceraprospectivecohortstudy
AT deroosechristophem nonoperativeversusoperativeapproachaccordingtotheresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyforrectalcanceraprospectivecohortstudy
AT sagaertxavier nonoperativeversusoperativeapproachaccordingtotheresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyforrectalcanceraprospectivecohortstudy
AT haustermanskarin nonoperativeversusoperativeapproachaccordingtotheresponsetoneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapyforrectalcanceraprospectivecohortstudy