Cargando…
Efficacy of a Commercial Weight Management Program Compared With a Do-It-Yourself Approach: A Randomized Clinical Trial
IMPORTANCE: Given the prevalence of obesity, accessible and effective treatment options are needed to manage obesity and its comorbid conditions. Commercial weight management programs are a potential solution to the lack of available treatment, providing greater access at lower cost than clinic-base...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35972742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.26561 |
_version_ | 1784769281569849344 |
---|---|
author | Tate, Deborah F. Lutes, Lesley D. Bryant, Maria Truesdale, Kimberly P. Hatley, Karen E. Griffiths, Zoe Tang, Tricia S. Padgett, Louise D. Pinto, Angela M. Stevens, June Foster, Gary D. |
author_facet | Tate, Deborah F. Lutes, Lesley D. Bryant, Maria Truesdale, Kimberly P. Hatley, Karen E. Griffiths, Zoe Tang, Tricia S. Padgett, Louise D. Pinto, Angela M. Stevens, June Foster, Gary D. |
author_sort | Tate, Deborah F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Given the prevalence of obesity, accessible and effective treatment options are needed to manage obesity and its comorbid conditions. Commercial weight management programs are a potential solution to the lack of available treatment, providing greater access at lower cost than clinic-based approaches, but few commercial programs have been rigorously evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To compare the differences in weight change between individuals randomly assigned to a commercial weight management program and those randomly assigned to a do-it-yourself (DIY) approach. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This 1-year, randomized clinical trial conducted in the United States, Canada, and United Kingdom between June 19, 2018, and November 30, 2019, enrolled 373 adults aged 18 to 75 years with a body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 25 to 45. Assessors were blinded to treatment conditions. INTERVENTIONS: A widely available commercial weight management program that included reduced requirements for dietary self-monitoring and recommendations for a variety of DIY approaches to weight loss. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcomes were the difference in weight change between the 2 groups at 3 and 12 months. The a priori hypothesis was that the commercial program would result in greater weight loss than the DIY approach at 3 and 12 months. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: The study include 373 participants (272 women [72.9%]; mean [SD] BMI, 33.8 [5.2]; 77 [20.6%] aged 18-34 years, 74 [19.8%] aged 35-43 years, 82 [22.0%] aged 44-52 years, and 140 [37.5%] aged 53-75 years). At 12 months, retention rates were 88.8% (166 of 187) for the commercial weight management program group and 95.7% (178 of 186) for the DIY group. At 3 months, participants in the commercial program had a mean (SD) weight loss of −3.8 (4.1) kg vs −1.8 (3.7) kg among those in the DIY group. At 12 months, participants in the commercial program had a mean (SD) weight loss of −4.4 (7.3) kg vs −1.7 (7.3) kg among those in the DIY group. The mean difference between groups was −2.0 kg (97.5% CI, −2.9 to −1.1 kg) at 3 months (P < .001) and −2.6 kg (97.5% CI, −4.3 to −0.8 kg) at 12 months (P < .001). A greater percentage of participants in the commercial program group than participants in the DIY group achieved loss of 5% of body weight at both 3 months (40.7% [72 of 177] vs 18.6% [34 of 183]) and 12 months (42.8% [71 of 166] vs 24.7% [44 of 178]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Adults randomly assigned to a commercial weight management program with reduced requirements for dietary self-monitoring lost more weight and were more likely to achieve weight loss of 5% at 3 and 12 months than adults following a DIY approach. This study contributes data on the efficacy of commercial weight management programs and DIY weight management approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03571893 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9382439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93824392022-08-30 Efficacy of a Commercial Weight Management Program Compared With a Do-It-Yourself Approach: A Randomized Clinical Trial Tate, Deborah F. Lutes, Lesley D. Bryant, Maria Truesdale, Kimberly P. Hatley, Karen E. Griffiths, Zoe Tang, Tricia S. Padgett, Louise D. Pinto, Angela M. Stevens, June Foster, Gary D. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Given the prevalence of obesity, accessible and effective treatment options are needed to manage obesity and its comorbid conditions. Commercial weight management programs are a potential solution to the lack of available treatment, providing greater access at lower cost than clinic-based approaches, but few commercial programs have been rigorously evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To compare the differences in weight change between individuals randomly assigned to a commercial weight management program and those randomly assigned to a do-it-yourself (DIY) approach. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This 1-year, randomized clinical trial conducted in the United States, Canada, and United Kingdom between June 19, 2018, and November 30, 2019, enrolled 373 adults aged 18 to 75 years with a body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 25 to 45. Assessors were blinded to treatment conditions. INTERVENTIONS: A widely available commercial weight management program that included reduced requirements for dietary self-monitoring and recommendations for a variety of DIY approaches to weight loss. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcomes were the difference in weight change between the 2 groups at 3 and 12 months. The a priori hypothesis was that the commercial program would result in greater weight loss than the DIY approach at 3 and 12 months. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: The study include 373 participants (272 women [72.9%]; mean [SD] BMI, 33.8 [5.2]; 77 [20.6%] aged 18-34 years, 74 [19.8%] aged 35-43 years, 82 [22.0%] aged 44-52 years, and 140 [37.5%] aged 53-75 years). At 12 months, retention rates were 88.8% (166 of 187) for the commercial weight management program group and 95.7% (178 of 186) for the DIY group. At 3 months, participants in the commercial program had a mean (SD) weight loss of −3.8 (4.1) kg vs −1.8 (3.7) kg among those in the DIY group. At 12 months, participants in the commercial program had a mean (SD) weight loss of −4.4 (7.3) kg vs −1.7 (7.3) kg among those in the DIY group. The mean difference between groups was −2.0 kg (97.5% CI, −2.9 to −1.1 kg) at 3 months (P < .001) and −2.6 kg (97.5% CI, −4.3 to −0.8 kg) at 12 months (P < .001). A greater percentage of participants in the commercial program group than participants in the DIY group achieved loss of 5% of body weight at both 3 months (40.7% [72 of 177] vs 18.6% [34 of 183]) and 12 months (42.8% [71 of 166] vs 24.7% [44 of 178]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Adults randomly assigned to a commercial weight management program with reduced requirements for dietary self-monitoring lost more weight and were more likely to achieve weight loss of 5% at 3 and 12 months than adults following a DIY approach. This study contributes data on the efficacy of commercial weight management programs and DIY weight management approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03571893 American Medical Association 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9382439/ /pubmed/35972742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.26561 Text en Copyright 2022 Tate DF et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Tate, Deborah F. Lutes, Lesley D. Bryant, Maria Truesdale, Kimberly P. Hatley, Karen E. Griffiths, Zoe Tang, Tricia S. Padgett, Louise D. Pinto, Angela M. Stevens, June Foster, Gary D. Efficacy of a Commercial Weight Management Program Compared With a Do-It-Yourself Approach: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | Efficacy of a Commercial Weight Management Program Compared With a Do-It-Yourself Approach: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | Efficacy of a Commercial Weight Management Program Compared With a Do-It-Yourself Approach: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of a Commercial Weight Management Program Compared With a Do-It-Yourself Approach: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of a Commercial Weight Management Program Compared With a Do-It-Yourself Approach: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | Efficacy of a Commercial Weight Management Program Compared With a Do-It-Yourself Approach: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | efficacy of a commercial weight management program compared with a do-it-yourself approach: a randomized clinical trial |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35972742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.26561 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tatedeborahf efficacyofacommercialweightmanagementprogramcomparedwithadoityourselfapproacharandomizedclinicaltrial AT luteslesleyd efficacyofacommercialweightmanagementprogramcomparedwithadoityourselfapproacharandomizedclinicaltrial AT bryantmaria efficacyofacommercialweightmanagementprogramcomparedwithadoityourselfapproacharandomizedclinicaltrial AT truesdalekimberlyp efficacyofacommercialweightmanagementprogramcomparedwithadoityourselfapproacharandomizedclinicaltrial AT hatleykarene efficacyofacommercialweightmanagementprogramcomparedwithadoityourselfapproacharandomizedclinicaltrial AT griffithszoe efficacyofacommercialweightmanagementprogramcomparedwithadoityourselfapproacharandomizedclinicaltrial AT tangtricias efficacyofacommercialweightmanagementprogramcomparedwithadoityourselfapproacharandomizedclinicaltrial AT padgettlouised efficacyofacommercialweightmanagementprogramcomparedwithadoityourselfapproacharandomizedclinicaltrial AT pintoangelam efficacyofacommercialweightmanagementprogramcomparedwithadoityourselfapproacharandomizedclinicaltrial AT stevensjune efficacyofacommercialweightmanagementprogramcomparedwithadoityourselfapproacharandomizedclinicaltrial AT fostergaryd efficacyofacommercialweightmanagementprogramcomparedwithadoityourselfapproacharandomizedclinicaltrial |