Cargando…

Website transparency of dermatology residency programs: a cross-sectional study

With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the dermatology residency application process rapidly transitioned in a number of dimensions. As in-person activities were canceled and USMLE Step 1 has become pass/fail, there have been several proposed changes to enhance the process, including a push for in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wyant, W. Austin, Elman, Scott A., Nambudiri, Vinod E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35976407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-022-02384-6
_version_ 1784769320829583360
author Wyant, W. Austin
Elman, Scott A.
Nambudiri, Vinod E.
author_facet Wyant, W. Austin
Elman, Scott A.
Nambudiri, Vinod E.
author_sort Wyant, W. Austin
collection PubMed
description With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the dermatology residency application process rapidly transitioned in a number of dimensions. As in-person activities were canceled and USMLE Step 1 has become pass/fail, there have been several proposed changes to enhance the process, including a push for increased transparency. Given than most dermatology applicants use program websites to learn more about potential residency programs, we conducted a cross-sectional study to quantify how transparent dermatology residency program website were, relative to published guidelines. From February 11, 2022, to February 25, 2022, we examined the available websites of all ACGME-accredited dermatology residencies to determine transparency regarding information dissemination, selection criteria, interview process, program priorities, and program requirements and opportunities. 136 out of 143 dermatology programs (95.1%) were included. Overall, programs were most transparent with program requirements and opportunities (87.25%). This included information on hospital locations, subspecialty clinics, and rotation/call/didactic schedules. Programs were least transparent with sharing their selection and/or exclusion criteria (31.13%) and varied in how much information they shared about the interview process (39.34%), as well as program priorities (64.56%). Opportunities remain for dermatology programs to improve website transparency and aid applicants in this difficult-to-navigate process. These results identify real transparency gaps, with several potential foci for improvement. Our main study limitation is its focus on a single time-period; to ensure that this information remains up to date, ongoing efforts to periodically resurvey content changes is warranted. Our findings provide an overview of programs’ successes and remaining opportunities to follow published transparency guidelines; overall, these findings may guide individual program directors aiming to improve the transparency of their dermatology residency programs and ultimately benefit our future workforce.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9382613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93826132022-08-17 Website transparency of dermatology residency programs: a cross-sectional study Wyant, W. Austin Elman, Scott A. Nambudiri, Vinod E. Arch Dermatol Res Short Report With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the dermatology residency application process rapidly transitioned in a number of dimensions. As in-person activities were canceled and USMLE Step 1 has become pass/fail, there have been several proposed changes to enhance the process, including a push for increased transparency. Given than most dermatology applicants use program websites to learn more about potential residency programs, we conducted a cross-sectional study to quantify how transparent dermatology residency program website were, relative to published guidelines. From February 11, 2022, to February 25, 2022, we examined the available websites of all ACGME-accredited dermatology residencies to determine transparency regarding information dissemination, selection criteria, interview process, program priorities, and program requirements and opportunities. 136 out of 143 dermatology programs (95.1%) were included. Overall, programs were most transparent with program requirements and opportunities (87.25%). This included information on hospital locations, subspecialty clinics, and rotation/call/didactic schedules. Programs were least transparent with sharing their selection and/or exclusion criteria (31.13%) and varied in how much information they shared about the interview process (39.34%), as well as program priorities (64.56%). Opportunities remain for dermatology programs to improve website transparency and aid applicants in this difficult-to-navigate process. These results identify real transparency gaps, with several potential foci for improvement. Our main study limitation is its focus on a single time-period; to ensure that this information remains up to date, ongoing efforts to periodically resurvey content changes is warranted. Our findings provide an overview of programs’ successes and remaining opportunities to follow published transparency guidelines; overall, these findings may guide individual program directors aiming to improve the transparency of their dermatology residency programs and ultimately benefit our future workforce. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-08-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9382613/ /pubmed/35976407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-022-02384-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Short Report
Wyant, W. Austin
Elman, Scott A.
Nambudiri, Vinod E.
Website transparency of dermatology residency programs: a cross-sectional study
title Website transparency of dermatology residency programs: a cross-sectional study
title_full Website transparency of dermatology residency programs: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Website transparency of dermatology residency programs: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Website transparency of dermatology residency programs: a cross-sectional study
title_short Website transparency of dermatology residency programs: a cross-sectional study
title_sort website transparency of dermatology residency programs: a cross-sectional study
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35976407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-022-02384-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wyantwaustin websitetransparencyofdermatologyresidencyprogramsacrosssectionalstudy
AT elmanscotta websitetransparencyofdermatologyresidencyprogramsacrosssectionalstudy
AT nambudirivinode websitetransparencyofdermatologyresidencyprogramsacrosssectionalstudy