Cargando…
Website transparency of dermatology residency programs: a cross-sectional study
With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the dermatology residency application process rapidly transitioned in a number of dimensions. As in-person activities were canceled and USMLE Step 1 has become pass/fail, there have been several proposed changes to enhance the process, including a push for in...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35976407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-022-02384-6 |
_version_ | 1784769320829583360 |
---|---|
author | Wyant, W. Austin Elman, Scott A. Nambudiri, Vinod E. |
author_facet | Wyant, W. Austin Elman, Scott A. Nambudiri, Vinod E. |
author_sort | Wyant, W. Austin |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the dermatology residency application process rapidly transitioned in a number of dimensions. As in-person activities were canceled and USMLE Step 1 has become pass/fail, there have been several proposed changes to enhance the process, including a push for increased transparency. Given than most dermatology applicants use program websites to learn more about potential residency programs, we conducted a cross-sectional study to quantify how transparent dermatology residency program website were, relative to published guidelines. From February 11, 2022, to February 25, 2022, we examined the available websites of all ACGME-accredited dermatology residencies to determine transparency regarding information dissemination, selection criteria, interview process, program priorities, and program requirements and opportunities. 136 out of 143 dermatology programs (95.1%) were included. Overall, programs were most transparent with program requirements and opportunities (87.25%). This included information on hospital locations, subspecialty clinics, and rotation/call/didactic schedules. Programs were least transparent with sharing their selection and/or exclusion criteria (31.13%) and varied in how much information they shared about the interview process (39.34%), as well as program priorities (64.56%). Opportunities remain for dermatology programs to improve website transparency and aid applicants in this difficult-to-navigate process. These results identify real transparency gaps, with several potential foci for improvement. Our main study limitation is its focus on a single time-period; to ensure that this information remains up to date, ongoing efforts to periodically resurvey content changes is warranted. Our findings provide an overview of programs’ successes and remaining opportunities to follow published transparency guidelines; overall, these findings may guide individual program directors aiming to improve the transparency of their dermatology residency programs and ultimately benefit our future workforce. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9382613 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93826132022-08-17 Website transparency of dermatology residency programs: a cross-sectional study Wyant, W. Austin Elman, Scott A. Nambudiri, Vinod E. Arch Dermatol Res Short Report With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the dermatology residency application process rapidly transitioned in a number of dimensions. As in-person activities were canceled and USMLE Step 1 has become pass/fail, there have been several proposed changes to enhance the process, including a push for increased transparency. Given than most dermatology applicants use program websites to learn more about potential residency programs, we conducted a cross-sectional study to quantify how transparent dermatology residency program website were, relative to published guidelines. From February 11, 2022, to February 25, 2022, we examined the available websites of all ACGME-accredited dermatology residencies to determine transparency regarding information dissemination, selection criteria, interview process, program priorities, and program requirements and opportunities. 136 out of 143 dermatology programs (95.1%) were included. Overall, programs were most transparent with program requirements and opportunities (87.25%). This included information on hospital locations, subspecialty clinics, and rotation/call/didactic schedules. Programs were least transparent with sharing their selection and/or exclusion criteria (31.13%) and varied in how much information they shared about the interview process (39.34%), as well as program priorities (64.56%). Opportunities remain for dermatology programs to improve website transparency and aid applicants in this difficult-to-navigate process. These results identify real transparency gaps, with several potential foci for improvement. Our main study limitation is its focus on a single time-period; to ensure that this information remains up to date, ongoing efforts to periodically resurvey content changes is warranted. Our findings provide an overview of programs’ successes and remaining opportunities to follow published transparency guidelines; overall, these findings may guide individual program directors aiming to improve the transparency of their dermatology residency programs and ultimately benefit our future workforce. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-08-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9382613/ /pubmed/35976407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-022-02384-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Wyant, W. Austin Elman, Scott A. Nambudiri, Vinod E. Website transparency of dermatology residency programs: a cross-sectional study |
title | Website transparency of dermatology residency programs: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Website transparency of dermatology residency programs: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Website transparency of dermatology residency programs: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Website transparency of dermatology residency programs: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Website transparency of dermatology residency programs: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | website transparency of dermatology residency programs: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35976407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00403-022-02384-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wyantwaustin websitetransparencyofdermatologyresidencyprogramsacrosssectionalstudy AT elmanscotta websitetransparencyofdermatologyresidencyprogramsacrosssectionalstudy AT nambudirivinode websitetransparencyofdermatologyresidencyprogramsacrosssectionalstudy |