Cargando…

Improving dynamic stroke risk prediction in non-anticoagulated patients with and without atrial fibrillation: comparing common clinical risk scores and machine learning algorithms

AIMS: Diversified cardiovascular/non-cardiovascular multi-morbid risk and efficient machine learning algorithms may facilitate improvements in stroke risk prediction, especially in newly diagnosed non-anticoagulated atrial fibrillation (AF) patients where initial decision-making on stroke prevention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lip, Gregory Y H, Tran, George, Genaidy, Ash, Marroquin, Patricia, Estes, Cara, Landsheft, Jeremy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33999139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab037
_version_ 1784769332511768576
author Lip, Gregory Y H
Tran, George
Genaidy, Ash
Marroquin, Patricia
Estes, Cara
Landsheft, Jeremy
author_facet Lip, Gregory Y H
Tran, George
Genaidy, Ash
Marroquin, Patricia
Estes, Cara
Landsheft, Jeremy
author_sort Lip, Gregory Y H
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Diversified cardiovascular/non-cardiovascular multi-morbid risk and efficient machine learning algorithms may facilitate improvements in stroke risk prediction, especially in newly diagnosed non-anticoagulated atrial fibrillation (AF) patients where initial decision-making on stroke prevention is needed. Therefore the aims of this article are to study common clinical risk assessment for stroke risk prediction in AF/non-AF cohorts together with cardiovascular/ non-cardiovascular multi-morbid conditions; to improve stroke risk prediction using machine learning approaches; and to compare the improved clinical prediction rules for multi-morbid conditions using machine learning algorithms METHODS AND RESULTS: We used cohort data from two health plans with 6 457 412 males/females contributing 14,188,679 person-years of data. The model inputs consisted of a diversified list of comorbidities/demographic/ temporal exposure variables, with the outcome capturing stroke event incidences. Machine learning algorithms used two parametric and two nonparametric techniques. The best prediction model was derived on the basis of non-linear formulations using machine learning criteria, with the highest c-index was obtained for logistic regression [0.892; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.886–0.898] with consistency on external validation (0.891; 95% CI 0.882–0.9). These were significantly higher than those based on the conventional stroke risk scores (CHADS2: 0.7488, 95% CI 0.746–0.7516; CHA2DS2-VASc: 0.7801, 95% CI 0.7772–0.7831) and multi-morbid index (0.8508, 95% CI 0.8483–0.8532). The machine learning algorithm had good internal and external calibration and net benefit values. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of newly diagnosed non-anticoagulated AF/non-AF patients, large improvements in stroke risk prediction can be shown with cardiovascular/non-cardiovascular multi-morbid index and a machine learning approach accounting for dynamic changes in risk factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9382661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93826612022-08-18 Improving dynamic stroke risk prediction in non-anticoagulated patients with and without atrial fibrillation: comparing common clinical risk scores and machine learning algorithms Lip, Gregory Y H Tran, George Genaidy, Ash Marroquin, Patricia Estes, Cara Landsheft, Jeremy Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes Original Article AIMS: Diversified cardiovascular/non-cardiovascular multi-morbid risk and efficient machine learning algorithms may facilitate improvements in stroke risk prediction, especially in newly diagnosed non-anticoagulated atrial fibrillation (AF) patients where initial decision-making on stroke prevention is needed. Therefore the aims of this article are to study common clinical risk assessment for stroke risk prediction in AF/non-AF cohorts together with cardiovascular/ non-cardiovascular multi-morbid conditions; to improve stroke risk prediction using machine learning approaches; and to compare the improved clinical prediction rules for multi-morbid conditions using machine learning algorithms METHODS AND RESULTS: We used cohort data from two health plans with 6 457 412 males/females contributing 14,188,679 person-years of data. The model inputs consisted of a diversified list of comorbidities/demographic/ temporal exposure variables, with the outcome capturing stroke event incidences. Machine learning algorithms used two parametric and two nonparametric techniques. The best prediction model was derived on the basis of non-linear formulations using machine learning criteria, with the highest c-index was obtained for logistic regression [0.892; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.886–0.898] with consistency on external validation (0.891; 95% CI 0.882–0.9). These were significantly higher than those based on the conventional stroke risk scores (CHADS2: 0.7488, 95% CI 0.746–0.7516; CHA2DS2-VASc: 0.7801, 95% CI 0.7772–0.7831) and multi-morbid index (0.8508, 95% CI 0.8483–0.8532). The machine learning algorithm had good internal and external calibration and net benefit values. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of newly diagnosed non-anticoagulated AF/non-AF patients, large improvements in stroke risk prediction can be shown with cardiovascular/non-cardiovascular multi-morbid index and a machine learning approach accounting for dynamic changes in risk factors. Oxford University Press 2021-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9382661/ /pubmed/33999139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab037 Text en The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lip, Gregory Y H
Tran, George
Genaidy, Ash
Marroquin, Patricia
Estes, Cara
Landsheft, Jeremy
Improving dynamic stroke risk prediction in non-anticoagulated patients with and without atrial fibrillation: comparing common clinical risk scores and machine learning algorithms
title Improving dynamic stroke risk prediction in non-anticoagulated patients with and without atrial fibrillation: comparing common clinical risk scores and machine learning algorithms
title_full Improving dynamic stroke risk prediction in non-anticoagulated patients with and without atrial fibrillation: comparing common clinical risk scores and machine learning algorithms
title_fullStr Improving dynamic stroke risk prediction in non-anticoagulated patients with and without atrial fibrillation: comparing common clinical risk scores and machine learning algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Improving dynamic stroke risk prediction in non-anticoagulated patients with and without atrial fibrillation: comparing common clinical risk scores and machine learning algorithms
title_short Improving dynamic stroke risk prediction in non-anticoagulated patients with and without atrial fibrillation: comparing common clinical risk scores and machine learning algorithms
title_sort improving dynamic stroke risk prediction in non-anticoagulated patients with and without atrial fibrillation: comparing common clinical risk scores and machine learning algorithms
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33999139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab037
work_keys_str_mv AT lipgregoryyh improvingdynamicstrokeriskpredictioninnonanticoagulatedpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationcomparingcommonclinicalriskscoresandmachinelearningalgorithms
AT trangeorge improvingdynamicstrokeriskpredictioninnonanticoagulatedpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationcomparingcommonclinicalriskscoresandmachinelearningalgorithms
AT genaidyash improvingdynamicstrokeriskpredictioninnonanticoagulatedpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationcomparingcommonclinicalriskscoresandmachinelearningalgorithms
AT marroquinpatricia improvingdynamicstrokeriskpredictioninnonanticoagulatedpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationcomparingcommonclinicalriskscoresandmachinelearningalgorithms
AT estescara improvingdynamicstrokeriskpredictioninnonanticoagulatedpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationcomparingcommonclinicalriskscoresandmachinelearningalgorithms
AT landsheftjeremy improvingdynamicstrokeriskpredictioninnonanticoagulatedpatientswithandwithoutatrialfibrillationcomparingcommonclinicalriskscoresandmachinelearningalgorithms