Cargando…

Antibacterial activity of recently approved antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are considered an important public health problem, and treatment options are limited. Accordingly, in this meta-analysis, we analyzed published studies to survey in vitro activity of recently approved antibiotics against MRSA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Fei, Rajabi, Sajad, Shi, Chunhua, Afifirad, Ghazale, Omidi, Nazanin, Kouhsari, Ebrahim, Khoshnood, Saeed, Azizian, Khalil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35978400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-022-00529-z
_version_ 1784769346123333632
author Liu, Fei
Rajabi, Sajad
Shi, Chunhua
Afifirad, Ghazale
Omidi, Nazanin
Kouhsari, Ebrahim
Khoshnood, Saeed
Azizian, Khalil
author_facet Liu, Fei
Rajabi, Sajad
Shi, Chunhua
Afifirad, Ghazale
Omidi, Nazanin
Kouhsari, Ebrahim
Khoshnood, Saeed
Azizian, Khalil
author_sort Liu, Fei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are considered an important public health problem, and treatment options are limited. Accordingly, in this meta-analysis, we analyzed published studies to survey in vitro activity of recently approved antibiotics against MRSA isolates. METHODS: We searched electronic databases; PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies (until November 30, 2020) that have focused on the in vitro activity of telavancin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, and tedizolid against MRSA isolates. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA software (version 14.0). RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies were included in this meta-analysis. Overall in vitro activity of tedizolid on 12,204 MRSA isolates was 0.250 and 0.5 µg/mL for MIC(50) and MIC(90), (minimum inhibitory concentration at which 50% and 90% of isolates were inhibited, respectively), respectively. The overall antibacterial activity of dalbavancin on 28539 MRSA isolates was 0.060 and 0.120 µg/mL for MIC(50) and MIC(90), respectively. The overall antibacterial activity of oritavancin on 420 MRSA isolates was 0.045 and 0.120 µg/mL for MIC(50) and MIC(90), respectively. The overall antibacterial activity of telavancin on 7353 MRSA isolates was 0.032 and 0.060 µg/mL for MIC(50) and MIC(90), respectively. The pooled prevalence of tedizolid, telavancin, and dalbavancin susceptibility was 100% (95% CI: 100–100). CONCLUSION: Telavancin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, and tedizolid had potent in vitro activity against MRSA isolates. The low MICs and high susceptibility rates of these antibiotics recommend a hopeful direction to introduce useful antibiotics in treating MRSA infections in the future. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12941-022-00529-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9382732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93827322022-08-18 Antibacterial activity of recently approved antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains: A systematic review and meta-analysis Liu, Fei Rajabi, Sajad Shi, Chunhua Afifirad, Ghazale Omidi, Nazanin Kouhsari, Ebrahim Khoshnood, Saeed Azizian, Khalil Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob Review BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are considered an important public health problem, and treatment options are limited. Accordingly, in this meta-analysis, we analyzed published studies to survey in vitro activity of recently approved antibiotics against MRSA isolates. METHODS: We searched electronic databases; PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies (until November 30, 2020) that have focused on the in vitro activity of telavancin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, and tedizolid against MRSA isolates. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA software (version 14.0). RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies were included in this meta-analysis. Overall in vitro activity of tedizolid on 12,204 MRSA isolates was 0.250 and 0.5 µg/mL for MIC(50) and MIC(90), (minimum inhibitory concentration at which 50% and 90% of isolates were inhibited, respectively), respectively. The overall antibacterial activity of dalbavancin on 28539 MRSA isolates was 0.060 and 0.120 µg/mL for MIC(50) and MIC(90), respectively. The overall antibacterial activity of oritavancin on 420 MRSA isolates was 0.045 and 0.120 µg/mL for MIC(50) and MIC(90), respectively. The overall antibacterial activity of telavancin on 7353 MRSA isolates was 0.032 and 0.060 µg/mL for MIC(50) and MIC(90), respectively. The pooled prevalence of tedizolid, telavancin, and dalbavancin susceptibility was 100% (95% CI: 100–100). CONCLUSION: Telavancin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, and tedizolid had potent in vitro activity against MRSA isolates. The low MICs and high susceptibility rates of these antibiotics recommend a hopeful direction to introduce useful antibiotics in treating MRSA infections in the future. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12941-022-00529-z. BioMed Central 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9382732/ /pubmed/35978400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-022-00529-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Liu, Fei
Rajabi, Sajad
Shi, Chunhua
Afifirad, Ghazale
Omidi, Nazanin
Kouhsari, Ebrahim
Khoshnood, Saeed
Azizian, Khalil
Antibacterial activity of recently approved antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Antibacterial activity of recently approved antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Antibacterial activity of recently approved antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Antibacterial activity of recently approved antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Antibacterial activity of recently approved antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Antibacterial activity of recently approved antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort antibacterial activity of recently approved antibiotics against methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa) strains: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35978400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-022-00529-z
work_keys_str_mv AT liufei antibacterialactivityofrecentlyapprovedantibioticsagainstmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsastrainsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rajabisajad antibacterialactivityofrecentlyapprovedantibioticsagainstmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsastrainsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shichunhua antibacterialactivityofrecentlyapprovedantibioticsagainstmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsastrainsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT afifiradghazale antibacterialactivityofrecentlyapprovedantibioticsagainstmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsastrainsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT omidinazanin antibacterialactivityofrecentlyapprovedantibioticsagainstmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsastrainsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kouhsariebrahim antibacterialactivityofrecentlyapprovedantibioticsagainstmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsastrainsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khoshnoodsaeed antibacterialactivityofrecentlyapprovedantibioticsagainstmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsastrainsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aziziankhalil antibacterialactivityofrecentlyapprovedantibioticsagainstmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsastrainsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis