Cargando…

Lymph node ratio is a prospective prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic index remains to be proven for gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). This study sought to investigate the prognostic value of LNR in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients after NACT. METHODS: LAGC p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Qi, Zeng, Xiangyu, Zhang, Chenggang, Yang, Ming, Fan, Jun, Mao, Gan, Shen, Qian, Yin, Yuping, Liu, Weizhen, Tao, Kaixiong, Zhang, Peng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35978363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02725-9
_version_ 1784769365451735040
author Jiang, Qi
Zeng, Xiangyu
Zhang, Chenggang
Yang, Ming
Fan, Jun
Mao, Gan
Shen, Qian
Yin, Yuping
Liu, Weizhen
Tao, Kaixiong
Zhang, Peng
author_facet Jiang, Qi
Zeng, Xiangyu
Zhang, Chenggang
Yang, Ming
Fan, Jun
Mao, Gan
Shen, Qian
Yin, Yuping
Liu, Weizhen
Tao, Kaixiong
Zhang, Peng
author_sort Jiang, Qi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The accuracy of lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic index remains to be proven for gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). This study sought to investigate the prognostic value of LNR in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients after NACT. METHODS: LAGC patients with clinical TNM stages 2–3, Her2(−), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, scores 0–2 are routinely scheduled with NACT. Patients with LAGC after NACT and surgical operation between January 2012 and October 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The correlation between LNR and survival was investigated. RESULTS: Overall, 148 patients were enrolled: 103 with low-LNR (LNR ≤ 30%) and 45 with high-LNR (LNR > 30%). Approximately, 50.5% and 24.4% patients responded to NACT at the primary site in the low-LNR and high-LNR groups, respectively. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of low-LNR group were considerably better than those of high-LNR group (3-year OS: 81.9% vs 18.5%, P < 0.001; 3-year PFS: 72.6% vs 13.5%, P < 0.001). In the low-LNR group, OS and PFS were superior in patients with tumor regression grade (TRG) 0–2 than in those with TRG 3 (3-year OS: 89.2% vs 73.2%, P = 0.086; 3-year PFS: 80.3% vs 66.5%, P = 0.036). In association with OS and PFS, the degree of tumor differentiation, TRG, and LNR were identified as predictive factors, and LNR was identified as the independent prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LNR is a prospective index of prognosis in patients with LAGC after NACT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02725-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9382835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93828352022-08-18 Lymph node ratio is a prospective prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy Jiang, Qi Zeng, Xiangyu Zhang, Chenggang Yang, Ming Fan, Jun Mao, Gan Shen, Qian Yin, Yuping Liu, Weizhen Tao, Kaixiong Zhang, Peng World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The accuracy of lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic index remains to be proven for gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). This study sought to investigate the prognostic value of LNR in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients after NACT. METHODS: LAGC patients with clinical TNM stages 2–3, Her2(−), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, scores 0–2 are routinely scheduled with NACT. Patients with LAGC after NACT and surgical operation between January 2012 and October 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The correlation between LNR and survival was investigated. RESULTS: Overall, 148 patients were enrolled: 103 with low-LNR (LNR ≤ 30%) and 45 with high-LNR (LNR > 30%). Approximately, 50.5% and 24.4% patients responded to NACT at the primary site in the low-LNR and high-LNR groups, respectively. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of low-LNR group were considerably better than those of high-LNR group (3-year OS: 81.9% vs 18.5%, P < 0.001; 3-year PFS: 72.6% vs 13.5%, P < 0.001). In the low-LNR group, OS and PFS were superior in patients with tumor regression grade (TRG) 0–2 than in those with TRG 3 (3-year OS: 89.2% vs 73.2%, P = 0.086; 3-year PFS: 80.3% vs 66.5%, P = 0.036). In association with OS and PFS, the degree of tumor differentiation, TRG, and LNR were identified as predictive factors, and LNR was identified as the independent prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LNR is a prospective index of prognosis in patients with LAGC after NACT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02725-9. BioMed Central 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9382835/ /pubmed/35978363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02725-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Jiang, Qi
Zeng, Xiangyu
Zhang, Chenggang
Yang, Ming
Fan, Jun
Mao, Gan
Shen, Qian
Yin, Yuping
Liu, Weizhen
Tao, Kaixiong
Zhang, Peng
Lymph node ratio is a prospective prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title Lymph node ratio is a prospective prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_full Lymph node ratio is a prospective prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_fullStr Lymph node ratio is a prospective prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Lymph node ratio is a prospective prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_short Lymph node ratio is a prospective prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_sort lymph node ratio is a prospective prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35978363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02725-9
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangqi lymphnoderatioisaprospectiveprognosticindicatorforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientsafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT zengxiangyu lymphnoderatioisaprospectiveprognosticindicatorforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientsafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT zhangchenggang lymphnoderatioisaprospectiveprognosticindicatorforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientsafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT yangming lymphnoderatioisaprospectiveprognosticindicatorforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientsafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT fanjun lymphnoderatioisaprospectiveprognosticindicatorforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientsafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT maogan lymphnoderatioisaprospectiveprognosticindicatorforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientsafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT shenqian lymphnoderatioisaprospectiveprognosticindicatorforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientsafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT yinyuping lymphnoderatioisaprospectiveprognosticindicatorforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientsafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT liuweizhen lymphnoderatioisaprospectiveprognosticindicatorforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientsafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT taokaixiong lymphnoderatioisaprospectiveprognosticindicatorforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientsafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT zhangpeng lymphnoderatioisaprospectiveprognosticindicatorforlocallyadvancedgastriccancerpatientsafterneoadjuvantchemotherapy