Cargando…
Scientific opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 216 revision 2 (FGE.216Rev2): consideration of the genotoxicity potential of α,β‐unsaturated 2‐phenyl‐2‐alkenals from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19
The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of five flavouring substances from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19, in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 216 (FGE.216). In FGE.216 and in FGE.216Rev1, the CEF Panel requested additional genotoxicity data on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35991962 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7420 |
_version_ | 1784769371447492608 |
---|---|
author | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul J. Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Benigni, Romualdo Bolognesi, Claudia Chipman, Kevin Cordelli, Eugenia Nørby, Karin Svendsen, Camilla Carfì, Maria Martino, Carla Mennes, Wim |
author_facet | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul J. Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Benigni, Romualdo Bolognesi, Claudia Chipman, Kevin Cordelli, Eugenia Nørby, Karin Svendsen, Camilla Carfì, Maria Martino, Carla Mennes, Wim |
collection | PubMed |
description | The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of five flavouring substances from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19, in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 216 (FGE.216). In FGE.216 and in FGE.216Rev1, the CEF Panel requested additional genotoxicity data on 2‐phenylcrotonaldehyde [FL‐no: 05.062], the representative for these five substances. New experimental data on [FL‐no: 05.062] were provided and are evaluated in the present revision of FGE.216 (FGE.216Rev2). Based on the new data, the Panel concluded that, for all the five substances, the concerns for gene mutations and clastogenicity are ruled out by the negative results observed in an in vivo gene mutation assay and in an in vivo comet assay, respectively. In vitro, [FL‐no: 05.062] induced micronuclei through an aneugenic mode of action. The available in vivo micronucleus studies were inconclusive and cannot be used to rule out potential aneugenicity of [FL‐no: 05.062] in vivo. Therefore, the Panel compared the lowest concentration resulting in aneugenicity in vitro with the use levels reported for this substance. Based on this comparison, the Panel concluded that the use of the flavouring substance [FL‐no: 05.062] at the reported use levels in several food categories would raise a concern for aneugenicity. Based on structural similarity, for the remaining four substances in this FGE [FL‐no: 05.099, 05.100, 05.175 and 05.222], an aneugenic potential may also be anticipated. For these four substances, individual data are needed to establish whether they have aneugenic potential. Accordingly, it is currently not appropriate to assess any of these five substances through the Procedure for the evaluation of flavouring substances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9382869 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93828692022-08-19 Scientific opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 216 revision 2 (FGE.216Rev2): consideration of the genotoxicity potential of α,β‐unsaturated 2‐phenyl‐2‐alkenals from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19 Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul J. Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Benigni, Romualdo Bolognesi, Claudia Chipman, Kevin Cordelli, Eugenia Nørby, Karin Svendsen, Camilla Carfì, Maria Martino, Carla Mennes, Wim EFSA J Scientific Opinion The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of five flavouring substances from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19, in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 216 (FGE.216). In FGE.216 and in FGE.216Rev1, the CEF Panel requested additional genotoxicity data on 2‐phenylcrotonaldehyde [FL‐no: 05.062], the representative for these five substances. New experimental data on [FL‐no: 05.062] were provided and are evaluated in the present revision of FGE.216 (FGE.216Rev2). Based on the new data, the Panel concluded that, for all the five substances, the concerns for gene mutations and clastogenicity are ruled out by the negative results observed in an in vivo gene mutation assay and in an in vivo comet assay, respectively. In vitro, [FL‐no: 05.062] induced micronuclei through an aneugenic mode of action. The available in vivo micronucleus studies were inconclusive and cannot be used to rule out potential aneugenicity of [FL‐no: 05.062] in vivo. Therefore, the Panel compared the lowest concentration resulting in aneugenicity in vitro with the use levels reported for this substance. Based on this comparison, the Panel concluded that the use of the flavouring substance [FL‐no: 05.062] at the reported use levels in several food categories would raise a concern for aneugenicity. Based on structural similarity, for the remaining four substances in this FGE [FL‐no: 05.099, 05.100, 05.175 and 05.222], an aneugenic potential may also be anticipated. For these four substances, individual data are needed to establish whether they have aneugenic potential. Accordingly, it is currently not appropriate to assess any of these five substances through the Procedure for the evaluation of flavouring substances. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9382869/ /pubmed/35991962 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7420 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul J. Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Benigni, Romualdo Bolognesi, Claudia Chipman, Kevin Cordelli, Eugenia Nørby, Karin Svendsen, Camilla Carfì, Maria Martino, Carla Mennes, Wim Scientific opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 216 revision 2 (FGE.216Rev2): consideration of the genotoxicity potential of α,β‐unsaturated 2‐phenyl‐2‐alkenals from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19 |
title | Scientific opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 216 revision 2 (FGE.216Rev2): consideration of the genotoxicity potential of α,β‐unsaturated 2‐phenyl‐2‐alkenals from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19 |
title_full | Scientific opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 216 revision 2 (FGE.216Rev2): consideration of the genotoxicity potential of α,β‐unsaturated 2‐phenyl‐2‐alkenals from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19 |
title_fullStr | Scientific opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 216 revision 2 (FGE.216Rev2): consideration of the genotoxicity potential of α,β‐unsaturated 2‐phenyl‐2‐alkenals from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Scientific opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 216 revision 2 (FGE.216Rev2): consideration of the genotoxicity potential of α,β‐unsaturated 2‐phenyl‐2‐alkenals from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19 |
title_short | Scientific opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 216 revision 2 (FGE.216Rev2): consideration of the genotoxicity potential of α,β‐unsaturated 2‐phenyl‐2‐alkenals from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19 |
title_sort | scientific opinion on flavouring group evaluation 216 revision 2 (fge.216rev2): consideration of the genotoxicity potential of α,β‐unsaturated 2‐phenyl‐2‐alkenals from subgroup 3.3 of fge.19 |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35991962 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7420 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT younesmaged scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT aquilinagabriele scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT castlelaurence scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT degengisela scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT engelkarlheinz scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT fowlerpaulj scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT frutosfernandezmariajose scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT furstpeter scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT gundertremyursula scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT gurtlerrainer scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT husøytrine scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT mancomelania scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT moldeuspeter scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT passamontisabina scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT shahromina scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT waalkensberendsenine scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT wrightmatthew scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT benigniromualdo scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT bolognesiclaudia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT chipmankevin scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT cordellieugenia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT nørbykarin scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT svendsencamilla scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT carfimaria scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT martinocarla scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 AT menneswim scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19 |