Cargando…

Scientific opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 216 revision 2 (FGE.216Rev2): consideration of the genotoxicity potential of α,β‐unsaturated 2‐phenyl‐2‐alkenals from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19

The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of five flavouring substances from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19, in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 216 (FGE.216). In FGE.216 and in FGE.216Rev1, the CEF Panel requested additional genotoxicity data on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Younes, Maged, Aquilina, Gabriele, Castle, Laurence, Degen, Gisela, Engel, Karl‐Heinz, Fowler, Paul J., Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose, Fürst, Peter, Gundert‐Remy, Ursula, Gürtler, Rainer, Husøy, Trine, Manco, Melania, Moldeus, Peter, Passamonti, Sabina, Shah, Romina, Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine, Wright, Matthew, Benigni, Romualdo, Bolognesi, Claudia, Chipman, Kevin, Cordelli, Eugenia, Nørby, Karin, Svendsen, Camilla, Carfì, Maria, Martino, Carla, Mennes, Wim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35991962
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7420
_version_ 1784769371447492608
author Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Degen, Gisela
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul J.
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Moldeus, Peter
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wright, Matthew
Benigni, Romualdo
Bolognesi, Claudia
Chipman, Kevin
Cordelli, Eugenia
Nørby, Karin
Svendsen, Camilla
Carfì, Maria
Martino, Carla
Mennes, Wim
author_facet Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Degen, Gisela
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul J.
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Moldeus, Peter
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wright, Matthew
Benigni, Romualdo
Bolognesi, Claudia
Chipman, Kevin
Cordelli, Eugenia
Nørby, Karin
Svendsen, Camilla
Carfì, Maria
Martino, Carla
Mennes, Wim
collection PubMed
description The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of five flavouring substances from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19, in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 216 (FGE.216). In FGE.216 and in FGE.216Rev1, the CEF Panel requested additional genotoxicity data on 2‐phenylcrotonaldehyde [FL‐no: 05.062], the representative for these five substances. New experimental data on [FL‐no: 05.062] were provided and are evaluated in the present revision of FGE.216 (FGE.216Rev2). Based on the new data, the Panel concluded that, for all the five substances, the concerns for gene mutations and clastogenicity are ruled out by the negative results observed in an in vivo gene mutation assay and in an in vivo comet assay, respectively. In vitro, [FL‐no: 05.062] induced micronuclei through an aneugenic mode of action. The available in vivo micronucleus studies were inconclusive and cannot be used to rule out potential aneugenicity of [FL‐no: 05.062] in vivo. Therefore, the Panel compared the lowest concentration resulting in aneugenicity in vitro with the use levels reported for this substance. Based on this comparison, the Panel concluded that the use of the flavouring substance [FL‐no: 05.062] at the reported use levels in several food categories would raise a concern for aneugenicity. Based on structural similarity, for the remaining four substances in this FGE [FL‐no: 05.099, 05.100, 05.175 and 05.222], an aneugenic potential may also be anticipated. For these four substances, individual data are needed to establish whether they have aneugenic potential. Accordingly, it is currently not appropriate to assess any of these five substances through the Procedure for the evaluation of flavouring substances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9382869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93828692022-08-19 Scientific opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 216 revision 2 (FGE.216Rev2): consideration of the genotoxicity potential of α,β‐unsaturated 2‐phenyl‐2‐alkenals from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19 Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul J. Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Benigni, Romualdo Bolognesi, Claudia Chipman, Kevin Cordelli, Eugenia Nørby, Karin Svendsen, Camilla Carfì, Maria Martino, Carla Mennes, Wim EFSA J Scientific Opinion The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of five flavouring substances from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19, in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 216 (FGE.216). In FGE.216 and in FGE.216Rev1, the CEF Panel requested additional genotoxicity data on 2‐phenylcrotonaldehyde [FL‐no: 05.062], the representative for these five substances. New experimental data on [FL‐no: 05.062] were provided and are evaluated in the present revision of FGE.216 (FGE.216Rev2). Based on the new data, the Panel concluded that, for all the five substances, the concerns for gene mutations and clastogenicity are ruled out by the negative results observed in an in vivo gene mutation assay and in an in vivo comet assay, respectively. In vitro, [FL‐no: 05.062] induced micronuclei through an aneugenic mode of action. The available in vivo micronucleus studies were inconclusive and cannot be used to rule out potential aneugenicity of [FL‐no: 05.062] in vivo. Therefore, the Panel compared the lowest concentration resulting in aneugenicity in vitro with the use levels reported for this substance. Based on this comparison, the Panel concluded that the use of the flavouring substance [FL‐no: 05.062] at the reported use levels in several food categories would raise a concern for aneugenicity. Based on structural similarity, for the remaining four substances in this FGE [FL‐no: 05.099, 05.100, 05.175 and 05.222], an aneugenic potential may also be anticipated. For these four substances, individual data are needed to establish whether they have aneugenic potential. Accordingly, it is currently not appropriate to assess any of these five substances through the Procedure for the evaluation of flavouring substances. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9382869/ /pubmed/35991962 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7420 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Degen, Gisela
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul J.
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Gürtler, Rainer
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Moldeus, Peter
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wright, Matthew
Benigni, Romualdo
Bolognesi, Claudia
Chipman, Kevin
Cordelli, Eugenia
Nørby, Karin
Svendsen, Camilla
Carfì, Maria
Martino, Carla
Mennes, Wim
Scientific opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 216 revision 2 (FGE.216Rev2): consideration of the genotoxicity potential of α,β‐unsaturated 2‐phenyl‐2‐alkenals from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19
title Scientific opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 216 revision 2 (FGE.216Rev2): consideration of the genotoxicity potential of α,β‐unsaturated 2‐phenyl‐2‐alkenals from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19
title_full Scientific opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 216 revision 2 (FGE.216Rev2): consideration of the genotoxicity potential of α,β‐unsaturated 2‐phenyl‐2‐alkenals from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19
title_fullStr Scientific opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 216 revision 2 (FGE.216Rev2): consideration of the genotoxicity potential of α,β‐unsaturated 2‐phenyl‐2‐alkenals from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19
title_full_unstemmed Scientific opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 216 revision 2 (FGE.216Rev2): consideration of the genotoxicity potential of α,β‐unsaturated 2‐phenyl‐2‐alkenals from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19
title_short Scientific opinion on Flavouring group evaluation 216 revision 2 (FGE.216Rev2): consideration of the genotoxicity potential of α,β‐unsaturated 2‐phenyl‐2‐alkenals from subgroup 3.3 of FGE.19
title_sort scientific opinion on flavouring group evaluation 216 revision 2 (fge.216rev2): consideration of the genotoxicity potential of α,β‐unsaturated 2‐phenyl‐2‐alkenals from subgroup 3.3 of fge.19
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35991962
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7420
work_keys_str_mv AT scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT younesmaged scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT aquilinagabriele scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT castlelaurence scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT degengisela scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT engelkarlheinz scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT fowlerpaulj scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT frutosfernandezmariajose scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT furstpeter scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT gundertremyursula scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT gurtlerrainer scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT husøytrine scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT mancomelania scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT moldeuspeter scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT passamontisabina scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT shahromina scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT waalkensberendsenine scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT wrightmatthew scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT benigniromualdo scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT bolognesiclaudia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT chipmankevin scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT cordellieugenia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT nørbykarin scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT svendsencamilla scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT carfimaria scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT martinocarla scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19
AT menneswim scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation216revision2fge216rev2considerationofthegenotoxicitypotentialofabunsaturated2phenyl2alkenalsfromsubgroup33offge19