Cargando…
Multielectrode Contact Measurement Can Improve Long-Term Outcome of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using Circular Single-Pulse Electroporation Ablation
Irreversible electroporation (IRE) ablation is generally performed with multielectrode catheters. Electrode-tissue contact is an important predictor for the success of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation; however, contact force is difficult to measure with multielectrode ablation catheters. In a preclinic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9384826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35917465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010835 |
_version_ | 1784769472200966144 |
---|---|
author | Groen, Marijn H.A. van Driel, Vincent J.H.M. Neven, Kars van Wessel, Harry de Bakker, Jacques M.T. Doevendans, Pieter A.F. Wittkampf, Fred H.M. Loh, Peter van Es, René |
author_facet | Groen, Marijn H.A. van Driel, Vincent J.H.M. Neven, Kars van Wessel, Harry de Bakker, Jacques M.T. Doevendans, Pieter A.F. Wittkampf, Fred H.M. Loh, Peter van Es, René |
author_sort | Groen, Marijn H.A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Irreversible electroporation (IRE) ablation is generally performed with multielectrode catheters. Electrode-tissue contact is an important predictor for the success of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation; however, contact force is difficult to measure with multielectrode ablation catheters. In a preclinical study, we assessed the feasibility of a multielectrode impedance system (MEIS) as a predictor of long-term success of PV isolation. In addition, we present the first-in-human clinical experience with MEIS. METHODS: In 10 pigs, one PV was ablated based on impedance (MEIS group), and the other PV was solely based on local electrogram information (EP group). IRE ablations were performed at 200 J. After 3 months, recurrence of conduction was assessed. Subsequently, in 30 patients undergoing PV isolation with IRE, MEIS was evaluated and MEIS contact values were compared to local electrograms. RESULTS: In the porcine study, 43 IRE applications were delivered in 19 PVs. Acutely, no reconnections were observed in either group. After 3 months, 0 versus 3 (P=0.21) PVs showed conduction recurrence in the MEIS and EP groups, respectively. Results from the clinical study showed a significant linear relation was found between mean MEIS value and bipolar dV/dt (r(2)=0.49, P<0.001), with a slope of 20.6 mV/s per Ohm. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the animal study suggest that MEIS values predict effective IRE applications. For the long-term success of electrical PV isolation with circular IRE applications, no significant difference in efficacy was found between ablation based on the measurement of electrode interface impedance and ablation using the classical EP approach for determining electrode-tissue contact. Experiences of the first clinical use of MEIS were promising and serve as an important basis for future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9384826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93848262022-08-19 Multielectrode Contact Measurement Can Improve Long-Term Outcome of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using Circular Single-Pulse Electroporation Ablation Groen, Marijn H.A. van Driel, Vincent J.H.M. Neven, Kars van Wessel, Harry de Bakker, Jacques M.T. Doevendans, Pieter A.F. Wittkampf, Fred H.M. Loh, Peter van Es, René Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Original Articles Irreversible electroporation (IRE) ablation is generally performed with multielectrode catheters. Electrode-tissue contact is an important predictor for the success of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation; however, contact force is difficult to measure with multielectrode ablation catheters. In a preclinical study, we assessed the feasibility of a multielectrode impedance system (MEIS) as a predictor of long-term success of PV isolation. In addition, we present the first-in-human clinical experience with MEIS. METHODS: In 10 pigs, one PV was ablated based on impedance (MEIS group), and the other PV was solely based on local electrogram information (EP group). IRE ablations were performed at 200 J. After 3 months, recurrence of conduction was assessed. Subsequently, in 30 patients undergoing PV isolation with IRE, MEIS was evaluated and MEIS contact values were compared to local electrograms. RESULTS: In the porcine study, 43 IRE applications were delivered in 19 PVs. Acutely, no reconnections were observed in either group. After 3 months, 0 versus 3 (P=0.21) PVs showed conduction recurrence in the MEIS and EP groups, respectively. Results from the clinical study showed a significant linear relation was found between mean MEIS value and bipolar dV/dt (r(2)=0.49, P<0.001), with a slope of 20.6 mV/s per Ohm. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the animal study suggest that MEIS values predict effective IRE applications. For the long-term success of electrical PV isolation with circular IRE applications, no significant difference in efficacy was found between ablation based on the measurement of electrode interface impedance and ablation using the classical EP approach for determining electrode-tissue contact. Experiences of the first clinical use of MEIS were promising and serve as an important basis for future research. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9384826/ /pubmed/35917465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010835 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Groen, Marijn H.A. van Driel, Vincent J.H.M. Neven, Kars van Wessel, Harry de Bakker, Jacques M.T. Doevendans, Pieter A.F. Wittkampf, Fred H.M. Loh, Peter van Es, René Multielectrode Contact Measurement Can Improve Long-Term Outcome of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using Circular Single-Pulse Electroporation Ablation |
title | Multielectrode Contact Measurement Can Improve Long-Term Outcome of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using Circular Single-Pulse Electroporation Ablation |
title_full | Multielectrode Contact Measurement Can Improve Long-Term Outcome of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using Circular Single-Pulse Electroporation Ablation |
title_fullStr | Multielectrode Contact Measurement Can Improve Long-Term Outcome of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using Circular Single-Pulse Electroporation Ablation |
title_full_unstemmed | Multielectrode Contact Measurement Can Improve Long-Term Outcome of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using Circular Single-Pulse Electroporation Ablation |
title_short | Multielectrode Contact Measurement Can Improve Long-Term Outcome of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using Circular Single-Pulse Electroporation Ablation |
title_sort | multielectrode contact measurement can improve long-term outcome of pulmonary vein isolation using circular single-pulse electroporation ablation |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9384826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35917465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010835 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT groenmarijnha multielectrodecontactmeasurementcanimprovelongtermoutcomeofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcircularsinglepulseelectroporationablation AT vandrielvincentjhm multielectrodecontactmeasurementcanimprovelongtermoutcomeofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcircularsinglepulseelectroporationablation AT nevenkars multielectrodecontactmeasurementcanimprovelongtermoutcomeofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcircularsinglepulseelectroporationablation AT vanwesselharry multielectrodecontactmeasurementcanimprovelongtermoutcomeofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcircularsinglepulseelectroporationablation AT debakkerjacquesmt multielectrodecontactmeasurementcanimprovelongtermoutcomeofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcircularsinglepulseelectroporationablation AT doevendanspieteraf multielectrodecontactmeasurementcanimprovelongtermoutcomeofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcircularsinglepulseelectroporationablation AT wittkampffredhm multielectrodecontactmeasurementcanimprovelongtermoutcomeofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcircularsinglepulseelectroporationablation AT lohpeter multielectrodecontactmeasurementcanimprovelongtermoutcomeofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcircularsinglepulseelectroporationablation AT vanesrene multielectrodecontactmeasurementcanimprovelongtermoutcomeofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcircularsinglepulseelectroporationablation |