Cargando…

Wolves and dogs fail to form reputations of humans after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation

Reputation is a key component in social interactions of group-living animals and appears to play a role in the establishment of cooperation. Animals can form reputations of individuals by directly interacting with them or by observing them interact with a third party, i.e., eavesdropping. Previous r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jim, Hoi-Lam, Plohovich, Marina, Marshall-Pescini, Sarah, Range, Friederike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9385025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35976865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271590
_version_ 1784769507154198528
author Jim, Hoi-Lam
Plohovich, Marina
Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
Range, Friederike
author_facet Jim, Hoi-Lam
Plohovich, Marina
Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
Range, Friederike
author_sort Jim, Hoi-Lam
collection PubMed
description Reputation is a key component in social interactions of group-living animals and appears to play a role in the establishment of cooperation. Animals can form reputations of individuals by directly interacting with them or by observing them interact with a third party, i.e., eavesdropping. Previous research has focused on whether dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) can eavesdrop on humans because of their ability to cooperate with humans, however the results are mixed and if they can eavesdrop, it is unknown whether this ability evolved during the domestication process or whether it was inherited from their ancestor, wolves (Canis lupus). Our study investigated whether equally hand-raised, pack-living dogs and wolves can form reputations of humans in a food-giving situation through indirect and/or direct experience. The experimental procedure comprised three parts: baseline (to test whether the subject preferred a person prior to the experiment), observation and testing. In the observation phase, the subject observed two humans interact with a dog demonstrator–one acted generously and fed the dog, and the other acted selfishly and refused to feed the dog. The subject could then choose which person to approach in the test phase. In the following experience phase, the animals interacted directly with the same two humans who behaved either in a generous or selfish manner. Then, they were again given a choice whom to approach. We found that dogs and wolves, at the group level, did not differentiate between a generous or selfish partner after indirect or direct experience, but wolves were more attentive towards the generous person during the observation phase and some dogs and wolves did prefer the generous partner, at least after indirect and direct experience was combined. Our study suggests that reputation formation may be more difficult than expected for animals and we emphasise the importance of context when studying reputation formation in animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9385025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93850252022-08-18 Wolves and dogs fail to form reputations of humans after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation Jim, Hoi-Lam Plohovich, Marina Marshall-Pescini, Sarah Range, Friederike PLoS One Research Article Reputation is a key component in social interactions of group-living animals and appears to play a role in the establishment of cooperation. Animals can form reputations of individuals by directly interacting with them or by observing them interact with a third party, i.e., eavesdropping. Previous research has focused on whether dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) can eavesdrop on humans because of their ability to cooperate with humans, however the results are mixed and if they can eavesdrop, it is unknown whether this ability evolved during the domestication process or whether it was inherited from their ancestor, wolves (Canis lupus). Our study investigated whether equally hand-raised, pack-living dogs and wolves can form reputations of humans in a food-giving situation through indirect and/or direct experience. The experimental procedure comprised three parts: baseline (to test whether the subject preferred a person prior to the experiment), observation and testing. In the observation phase, the subject observed two humans interact with a dog demonstrator–one acted generously and fed the dog, and the other acted selfishly and refused to feed the dog. The subject could then choose which person to approach in the test phase. In the following experience phase, the animals interacted directly with the same two humans who behaved either in a generous or selfish manner. Then, they were again given a choice whom to approach. We found that dogs and wolves, at the group level, did not differentiate between a generous or selfish partner after indirect or direct experience, but wolves were more attentive towards the generous person during the observation phase and some dogs and wolves did prefer the generous partner, at least after indirect and direct experience was combined. Our study suggests that reputation formation may be more difficult than expected for animals and we emphasise the importance of context when studying reputation formation in animals. Public Library of Science 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9385025/ /pubmed/35976865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271590 Text en © 2022 Jim et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jim, Hoi-Lam
Plohovich, Marina
Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
Range, Friederike
Wolves and dogs fail to form reputations of humans after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation
title Wolves and dogs fail to form reputations of humans after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation
title_full Wolves and dogs fail to form reputations of humans after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation
title_fullStr Wolves and dogs fail to form reputations of humans after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation
title_full_unstemmed Wolves and dogs fail to form reputations of humans after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation
title_short Wolves and dogs fail to form reputations of humans after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation
title_sort wolves and dogs fail to form reputations of humans after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9385025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35976865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271590
work_keys_str_mv AT jimhoilam wolvesanddogsfailtoformreputationsofhumansafterindirectanddirectexperienceinafoodgivingsituation
AT plohovichmarina wolvesanddogsfailtoformreputationsofhumansafterindirectanddirectexperienceinafoodgivingsituation
AT marshallpescinisarah wolvesanddogsfailtoformreputationsofhumansafterindirectanddirectexperienceinafoodgivingsituation
AT rangefriederike wolvesanddogsfailtoformreputationsofhumansafterindirectanddirectexperienceinafoodgivingsituation