Cargando…

Current Methods of Tissue Extraction in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Since the 2014 Food and Drug Administration communication regarding the use of power morcellation, gynecologists have adopted alternative tissue extraction strategies. The objective of this study is to investigate the current techniques used by gynecologic surgeons for tis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Renita, Pepin, Kristen, Dmello, Monalisa, Clark, Nisse, Ajao, Mobolaji, Einarsson, Jon, Rassier, Sarah Cohen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9385112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36071994
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00036
_version_ 1784769528251547648
author Kim, Renita
Pepin, Kristen
Dmello, Monalisa
Clark, Nisse
Ajao, Mobolaji
Einarsson, Jon
Rassier, Sarah Cohen
author_facet Kim, Renita
Pepin, Kristen
Dmello, Monalisa
Clark, Nisse
Ajao, Mobolaji
Einarsson, Jon
Rassier, Sarah Cohen
author_sort Kim, Renita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Since the 2014 Food and Drug Administration communication regarding the use of power morcellation, gynecologists have adopted alternative tissue extraction strategies. The objective of this study is to investigate the current techniques used by gynecologic surgeons for tissue extraction following minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy for fibroids. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to all AAGL members and responses were collected between March 26, 2019 and April 17, 2019. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-six respondents completed the survey. For hysterectomy, the most common methods of tissue extraction were manual morcellation through the colpotomy (72.4%) or minilaparotomy (66.9%). Nearly one-third (31.7%) endorsed using power morcellation. For myomectomy, manual morcellation via minilaparotomy (71.9%) was the most common approach, followed by power morcellation (35.7%). Use of containment bags was common. Minilaparotomy incisions were typically three cm and most often at the umbilicus. Geographic differences were detected, particularly with power morcellation. During hysterectomy, 18.4% of US-based surgeons reported its use, compared to 56.9% of nonUS-based surgeons. During myomectomy, 20.5% of US-based surgeons reported its use compared to 67.5% of their international counterparts. Age, years in practice, fellowship training, and practice location were all significantly associated with power morcellator use. CONCLUSION: A large majority of practitioners are performing manual morcellation through the colpotomy or minilaparotomy. Use of containment bags is common with all routes of tissue removal. Power morcellation use is less common in the United States than in other countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9385112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93851122022-09-06 Current Methods of Tissue Extraction in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids Kim, Renita Pepin, Kristen Dmello, Monalisa Clark, Nisse Ajao, Mobolaji Einarsson, Jon Rassier, Sarah Cohen JSLS Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Since the 2014 Food and Drug Administration communication regarding the use of power morcellation, gynecologists have adopted alternative tissue extraction strategies. The objective of this study is to investigate the current techniques used by gynecologic surgeons for tissue extraction following minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy for fibroids. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to all AAGL members and responses were collected between March 26, 2019 and April 17, 2019. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-six respondents completed the survey. For hysterectomy, the most common methods of tissue extraction were manual morcellation through the colpotomy (72.4%) or minilaparotomy (66.9%). Nearly one-third (31.7%) endorsed using power morcellation. For myomectomy, manual morcellation via minilaparotomy (71.9%) was the most common approach, followed by power morcellation (35.7%). Use of containment bags was common. Minilaparotomy incisions were typically three cm and most often at the umbilicus. Geographic differences were detected, particularly with power morcellation. During hysterectomy, 18.4% of US-based surgeons reported its use, compared to 56.9% of nonUS-based surgeons. During myomectomy, 20.5% of US-based surgeons reported its use compared to 67.5% of their international counterparts. Age, years in practice, fellowship training, and practice location were all significantly associated with power morcellator use. CONCLUSION: A large majority of practitioners are performing manual morcellation through the colpotomy or minilaparotomy. Use of containment bags is common with all routes of tissue removal. Power morcellation use is less common in the United States than in other countries. The Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9385112/ /pubmed/36071994 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00036 Text en © 2022 by SLS, Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/) ), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Renita
Pepin, Kristen
Dmello, Monalisa
Clark, Nisse
Ajao, Mobolaji
Einarsson, Jon
Rassier, Sarah Cohen
Current Methods of Tissue Extraction in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids
title Current Methods of Tissue Extraction in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids
title_full Current Methods of Tissue Extraction in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids
title_fullStr Current Methods of Tissue Extraction in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids
title_full_unstemmed Current Methods of Tissue Extraction in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids
title_short Current Methods of Tissue Extraction in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids
title_sort current methods of tissue extraction in minimally invasive surgical treatment of uterine fibroids
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9385112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36071994
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00036
work_keys_str_mv AT kimrenita currentmethodsoftissueextractioninminimallyinvasivesurgicaltreatmentofuterinefibroids
AT pepinkristen currentmethodsoftissueextractioninminimallyinvasivesurgicaltreatmentofuterinefibroids
AT dmellomonalisa currentmethodsoftissueextractioninminimallyinvasivesurgicaltreatmentofuterinefibroids
AT clarknisse currentmethodsoftissueextractioninminimallyinvasivesurgicaltreatmentofuterinefibroids
AT ajaomobolaji currentmethodsoftissueextractioninminimallyinvasivesurgicaltreatmentofuterinefibroids
AT einarssonjon currentmethodsoftissueextractioninminimallyinvasivesurgicaltreatmentofuterinefibroids
AT rassiersarahcohen currentmethodsoftissueextractioninminimallyinvasivesurgicaltreatmentofuterinefibroids