Cargando…

Excellent Outcomes With the Selective Use of Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Bone and Joint Infections: A Single-Center Experience

Background and objective Recent studies have challenged the notion that prolonged intravenous (IV) antibiotics are preferable to oral antibiotics for treating musculoskeletal infections. Our institution’s orthopedic surgery and orthopedic infectious disease (ID) groups have established consensus cri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halouska, Mason A, Van Roy, Zachary A, Lang, Amanda N, Hilbers, Jacey, Hewlett, Angela L, Cortes-Penfield, Nicolas W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9385201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35989847
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26982
_version_ 1784769541943853056
author Halouska, Mason A
Van Roy, Zachary A
Lang, Amanda N
Hilbers, Jacey
Hewlett, Angela L
Cortes-Penfield, Nicolas W
author_facet Halouska, Mason A
Van Roy, Zachary A
Lang, Amanda N
Hilbers, Jacey
Hewlett, Angela L
Cortes-Penfield, Nicolas W
author_sort Halouska, Mason A
collection PubMed
description Background and objective Recent studies have challenged the notion that prolonged intravenous (IV) antibiotics are preferable to oral antibiotics for treating musculoskeletal infections. Our institution’s orthopedic surgery and orthopedic infectious disease (ID) groups have established consensus criteria for the use of oral antibiotics in musculoskeletal infections. In this study, we examine one-year and two-year outcomes of the selective use of oral antibiotics for musculoskeletal infections in a real-world setting. Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of adults seen in our orthopedic ID clinic over a six-month period for the first episode of surgically managed osteomyelitis, native joint septic arthritis (NJSA), prosthetic joint infection (PJI), or other musculoskeletal hardware infection with an established microbiologic etiology who received surgical interventions and >2 weeks of antimicrobial treatment. Patients were evaluated for treatment failure at one year and two years following their index surgery, which we defined as death, unplanned surgery, or the initiation of chronic antibiotic suppression. Results One-year treatment failure rates were 0/23 (0%) in patients who switched to oral therapy versus 6/17 (35%) in patients who remained on IV treatment. Two-year treatment failure rates were 0/23 (0%) in patients who switched to oral therapy versus 8/17 (47%) in patients who remained on IV treatment. Conclusions Our consensus criteria for the switch to oral antibiotics for musculoskeletal infections identified patients who went on to have excellent outcomes at one year and two years, suggesting that these criteria can effectively identify patients at low risk for treatment failure. Collaboration between ID specialists and orthopedic surgeons to select antimicrobial regimens can avoid significant burdens, costs, and complications associated with prolonged IV therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9385201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93852012022-08-19 Excellent Outcomes With the Selective Use of Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Bone and Joint Infections: A Single-Center Experience Halouska, Mason A Van Roy, Zachary A Lang, Amanda N Hilbers, Jacey Hewlett, Angela L Cortes-Penfield, Nicolas W Cureus Infectious Disease Background and objective Recent studies have challenged the notion that prolonged intravenous (IV) antibiotics are preferable to oral antibiotics for treating musculoskeletal infections. Our institution’s orthopedic surgery and orthopedic infectious disease (ID) groups have established consensus criteria for the use of oral antibiotics in musculoskeletal infections. In this study, we examine one-year and two-year outcomes of the selective use of oral antibiotics for musculoskeletal infections in a real-world setting. Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of adults seen in our orthopedic ID clinic over a six-month period for the first episode of surgically managed osteomyelitis, native joint septic arthritis (NJSA), prosthetic joint infection (PJI), or other musculoskeletal hardware infection with an established microbiologic etiology who received surgical interventions and >2 weeks of antimicrobial treatment. Patients were evaluated for treatment failure at one year and two years following their index surgery, which we defined as death, unplanned surgery, or the initiation of chronic antibiotic suppression. Results One-year treatment failure rates were 0/23 (0%) in patients who switched to oral therapy versus 6/17 (35%) in patients who remained on IV treatment. Two-year treatment failure rates were 0/23 (0%) in patients who switched to oral therapy versus 8/17 (47%) in patients who remained on IV treatment. Conclusions Our consensus criteria for the switch to oral antibiotics for musculoskeletal infections identified patients who went on to have excellent outcomes at one year and two years, suggesting that these criteria can effectively identify patients at low risk for treatment failure. Collaboration between ID specialists and orthopedic surgeons to select antimicrobial regimens can avoid significant burdens, costs, and complications associated with prolonged IV therapy. Cureus 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9385201/ /pubmed/35989847 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26982 Text en Copyright © 2022, Halouska et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Infectious Disease
Halouska, Mason A
Van Roy, Zachary A
Lang, Amanda N
Hilbers, Jacey
Hewlett, Angela L
Cortes-Penfield, Nicolas W
Excellent Outcomes With the Selective Use of Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Bone and Joint Infections: A Single-Center Experience
title Excellent Outcomes With the Selective Use of Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Bone and Joint Infections: A Single-Center Experience
title_full Excellent Outcomes With the Selective Use of Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Bone and Joint Infections: A Single-Center Experience
title_fullStr Excellent Outcomes With the Selective Use of Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Bone and Joint Infections: A Single-Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Excellent Outcomes With the Selective Use of Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Bone and Joint Infections: A Single-Center Experience
title_short Excellent Outcomes With the Selective Use of Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Bone and Joint Infections: A Single-Center Experience
title_sort excellent outcomes with the selective use of oral antibiotic therapy for bone and joint infections: a single-center experience
topic Infectious Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9385201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35989847
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26982
work_keys_str_mv AT halouskamasona excellentoutcomeswiththeselectiveuseoforalantibiotictherapyforboneandjointinfectionsasinglecenterexperience
AT vanroyzacharya excellentoutcomeswiththeselectiveuseoforalantibiotictherapyforboneandjointinfectionsasinglecenterexperience
AT langamandan excellentoutcomeswiththeselectiveuseoforalantibiotictherapyforboneandjointinfectionsasinglecenterexperience
AT hilbersjacey excellentoutcomeswiththeselectiveuseoforalantibiotictherapyforboneandjointinfectionsasinglecenterexperience
AT hewlettangelal excellentoutcomeswiththeselectiveuseoforalantibiotictherapyforboneandjointinfectionsasinglecenterexperience
AT cortespenfieldnicolasw excellentoutcomeswiththeselectiveuseoforalantibiotictherapyforboneandjointinfectionsasinglecenterexperience