Cargando…

Empathy in patient-clinician interactions when using telecommunication: A rapid review of the evidence

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the replacement of many face-to-face healthcare consultations with telephone consultations. Little is known about the extent to which empathy can be expressed in telephone consultations. Our objective is to review evidence related to empathy in telephone...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Budd, Georgina, Griffiths, Dan, Howick, Jeremy, Vennik, Jane, Bishop, Felicity L., Durieux, Nancy, Everitt, Hazel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9385203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35996734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100065
_version_ 1784769542411517952
author Budd, Georgina
Griffiths, Dan
Howick, Jeremy
Vennik, Jane
Bishop, Felicity L.
Durieux, Nancy
Everitt, Hazel A.
author_facet Budd, Georgina
Griffiths, Dan
Howick, Jeremy
Vennik, Jane
Bishop, Felicity L.
Durieux, Nancy
Everitt, Hazel A.
author_sort Budd, Georgina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the replacement of many face-to-face healthcare consultations with telephone consultations. Little is known about the extent to which empathy can be expressed in telephone consultations. Our objective is to review evidence related to empathy in telephone consultations including clinical outcomes, and patient/practitioner experiences. METHODS: Searches of Medline/Ovid and PsycINFO/Ovid were undertaken. Titles and abstract screening, data extraction, and risk of bias were undertaken by two reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved in discussion with additional reviewers. Included studies were specific to tele-communications with empirical data on empathy related to patient outcomes/views, published (in English), 2010–2021. Studies that did not mention empathy explicitly were excluded. RESULTS: Our search yielded 740 individual records and 8 studies (527 patients, 20 practitioners) met inclusion criteria: Some barriers to expression of empathy were noted, but no major obstacles were reported. However, data was sparse and most studies had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: Empathy in telephone consultations is possible, (though the loss of non-verbal cues and touch can present barriers) however the research does not yet identify how. INNOVATION: It is possible to establish and display empathy in telephone consultations, but future research needs to identify how this can be optimized. FUNDING: This work was supported by a 10.13039/501100000272National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) 10.13039/501100013374School for Primary Care Research grant (project number 389). The 10.13039/501100000739University of Southampton's Primary Care Department is a member of the 10.13039/501100013374NIHR School for Primary Care Research and supported by NIHR Research funds. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Protocol registration. PROSPERO (CRD42021238087).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9385203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93852032022-08-18 Empathy in patient-clinician interactions when using telecommunication: A rapid review of the evidence Budd, Georgina Griffiths, Dan Howick, Jeremy Vennik, Jane Bishop, Felicity L. Durieux, Nancy Everitt, Hazel A. PEC Innov Review article OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the replacement of many face-to-face healthcare consultations with telephone consultations. Little is known about the extent to which empathy can be expressed in telephone consultations. Our objective is to review evidence related to empathy in telephone consultations including clinical outcomes, and patient/practitioner experiences. METHODS: Searches of Medline/Ovid and PsycINFO/Ovid were undertaken. Titles and abstract screening, data extraction, and risk of bias were undertaken by two reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved in discussion with additional reviewers. Included studies were specific to tele-communications with empirical data on empathy related to patient outcomes/views, published (in English), 2010–2021. Studies that did not mention empathy explicitly were excluded. RESULTS: Our search yielded 740 individual records and 8 studies (527 patients, 20 practitioners) met inclusion criteria: Some barriers to expression of empathy were noted, but no major obstacles were reported. However, data was sparse and most studies had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: Empathy in telephone consultations is possible, (though the loss of non-verbal cues and touch can present barriers) however the research does not yet identify how. INNOVATION: It is possible to establish and display empathy in telephone consultations, but future research needs to identify how this can be optimized. FUNDING: This work was supported by a 10.13039/501100000272National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) 10.13039/501100013374School for Primary Care Research grant (project number 389). The 10.13039/501100000739University of Southampton's Primary Care Department is a member of the 10.13039/501100013374NIHR School for Primary Care Research and supported by NIHR Research funds. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Protocol registration. PROSPERO (CRD42021238087). Elsevier 2022-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9385203/ /pubmed/35996734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100065 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review article
Budd, Georgina
Griffiths, Dan
Howick, Jeremy
Vennik, Jane
Bishop, Felicity L.
Durieux, Nancy
Everitt, Hazel A.
Empathy in patient-clinician interactions when using telecommunication: A rapid review of the evidence
title Empathy in patient-clinician interactions when using telecommunication: A rapid review of the evidence
title_full Empathy in patient-clinician interactions when using telecommunication: A rapid review of the evidence
title_fullStr Empathy in patient-clinician interactions when using telecommunication: A rapid review of the evidence
title_full_unstemmed Empathy in patient-clinician interactions when using telecommunication: A rapid review of the evidence
title_short Empathy in patient-clinician interactions when using telecommunication: A rapid review of the evidence
title_sort empathy in patient-clinician interactions when using telecommunication: a rapid review of the evidence
topic Review article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9385203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35996734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100065
work_keys_str_mv AT buddgeorgina empathyinpatientclinicianinteractionswhenusingtelecommunicationarapidreviewoftheevidence
AT griffithsdan empathyinpatientclinicianinteractionswhenusingtelecommunicationarapidreviewoftheevidence
AT howickjeremy empathyinpatientclinicianinteractionswhenusingtelecommunicationarapidreviewoftheevidence
AT vennikjane empathyinpatientclinicianinteractionswhenusingtelecommunicationarapidreviewoftheevidence
AT bishopfelicityl empathyinpatientclinicianinteractionswhenusingtelecommunicationarapidreviewoftheevidence
AT durieuxnancy empathyinpatientclinicianinteractionswhenusingtelecommunicationarapidreviewoftheevidence
AT everitthazela empathyinpatientclinicianinteractionswhenusingtelecommunicationarapidreviewoftheevidence