Cargando…

An Analysis of Predictive Sample-to-Cutoff Index for HIV Infection Confirmation Using Elecsys® HIV Combi PT Assay

BACKGROUND: Early and rapid diagnosis is crucial in HIV preventing and treatment. However, the false-positive rate (FPR) by 4-th generation detection assays was high in low-HIV-prevalence regions. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the relation between sample-to-cutoff index (COI) and HIV confirmatory results,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xia, Xiaohong, Zhang, Xiang, Zhou, Jun, Zhang, Mengying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9385312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5097189
_version_ 1784769563077902336
author Xia, Xiaohong
Zhang, Xiang
Zhou, Jun
Zhang, Mengying
author_facet Xia, Xiaohong
Zhang, Xiang
Zhou, Jun
Zhang, Mengying
author_sort Xia, Xiaohong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early and rapid diagnosis is crucial in HIV preventing and treatment. However, the false-positive rate (FPR) by 4-th generation detection assays was high in low-HIV-prevalence regions. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the relation between sample-to-cutoff index (COI) and HIV confirmatory results, and to explore a new COI threshold in our own laboratory to predict HIV infection. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed primarily reactive results by Elecsys® HIV combi PT assays and their confirmatory results by western blot (WB) at Nanjing Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The mean COI values of true positive (TP), false positive (FP), and indeterminate groups were compared, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the optimal COI value for predicting HIV infection. RESULTS: Totally 150,980 HIV serological results were reviewed, and 305 (0.2%) were primarily reactive. There are 82 (26.89%) true positives, 210 (71.92%) false positives, and 11 indeterminate samples confirmed by WB tests, and another 2 patients rejected WB tests. Mean COI values of TP (643.5) were greatly higher than that of FP (3.174) (P < 0.0001), but there is no significant difference between FP and indeterminate groups. Combining the requirement of HIV diagnosis and ROC analysis, 9.87 was established as the optimal threshold to predict the infection, with 100% sensitivity and 99.99% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: By adjusting the COI threshold, the FP samples can be reduced and the efficiency of screening assays can be increased, which can save much additional reagent and staff costs and much time for delivery of HIV test results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9385312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93853122022-08-24 An Analysis of Predictive Sample-to-Cutoff Index for HIV Infection Confirmation Using Elecsys® HIV Combi PT Assay Xia, Xiaohong Zhang, Xiang Zhou, Jun Zhang, Mengying Int J Clin Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Early and rapid diagnosis is crucial in HIV preventing and treatment. However, the false-positive rate (FPR) by 4-th generation detection assays was high in low-HIV-prevalence regions. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the relation between sample-to-cutoff index (COI) and HIV confirmatory results, and to explore a new COI threshold in our own laboratory to predict HIV infection. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed primarily reactive results by Elecsys® HIV combi PT assays and their confirmatory results by western blot (WB) at Nanjing Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The mean COI values of true positive (TP), false positive (FP), and indeterminate groups were compared, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the optimal COI value for predicting HIV infection. RESULTS: Totally 150,980 HIV serological results were reviewed, and 305 (0.2%) were primarily reactive. There are 82 (26.89%) true positives, 210 (71.92%) false positives, and 11 indeterminate samples confirmed by WB tests, and another 2 patients rejected WB tests. Mean COI values of TP (643.5) were greatly higher than that of FP (3.174) (P < 0.0001), but there is no significant difference between FP and indeterminate groups. Combining the requirement of HIV diagnosis and ROC analysis, 9.87 was established as the optimal threshold to predict the infection, with 100% sensitivity and 99.99% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: By adjusting the COI threshold, the FP samples can be reduced and the efficiency of screening assays can be increased, which can save much additional reagent and staff costs and much time for delivery of HIV test results. Hindawi 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9385312/ /pubmed/36016828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5097189 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xiaohong Xia et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xia, Xiaohong
Zhang, Xiang
Zhou, Jun
Zhang, Mengying
An Analysis of Predictive Sample-to-Cutoff Index for HIV Infection Confirmation Using Elecsys® HIV Combi PT Assay
title An Analysis of Predictive Sample-to-Cutoff Index for HIV Infection Confirmation Using Elecsys® HIV Combi PT Assay
title_full An Analysis of Predictive Sample-to-Cutoff Index for HIV Infection Confirmation Using Elecsys® HIV Combi PT Assay
title_fullStr An Analysis of Predictive Sample-to-Cutoff Index for HIV Infection Confirmation Using Elecsys® HIV Combi PT Assay
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of Predictive Sample-to-Cutoff Index for HIV Infection Confirmation Using Elecsys® HIV Combi PT Assay
title_short An Analysis of Predictive Sample-to-Cutoff Index for HIV Infection Confirmation Using Elecsys® HIV Combi PT Assay
title_sort analysis of predictive sample-to-cutoff index for hiv infection confirmation using elecsys® hiv combi pt assay
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9385312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5097189
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaxiaohong ananalysisofpredictivesampletocutoffindexforhivinfectionconfirmationusingelecsyshivcombiptassay
AT zhangxiang ananalysisofpredictivesampletocutoffindexforhivinfectionconfirmationusingelecsyshivcombiptassay
AT zhoujun ananalysisofpredictivesampletocutoffindexforhivinfectionconfirmationusingelecsyshivcombiptassay
AT zhangmengying ananalysisofpredictivesampletocutoffindexforhivinfectionconfirmationusingelecsyshivcombiptassay
AT xiaxiaohong analysisofpredictivesampletocutoffindexforhivinfectionconfirmationusingelecsyshivcombiptassay
AT zhangxiang analysisofpredictivesampletocutoffindexforhivinfectionconfirmationusingelecsyshivcombiptassay
AT zhoujun analysisofpredictivesampletocutoffindexforhivinfectionconfirmationusingelecsyshivcombiptassay
AT zhangmengying analysisofpredictivesampletocutoffindexforhivinfectionconfirmationusingelecsyshivcombiptassay