Cargando…
Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network
INTRODUCTION: Geographic disparities in diabetes burden exist throughout the United States (US), with many risk factors for diabetes clustering at a community or neighborhood level. We hypothesized that the likelihood of new onset type 2 diabetes (T2D) would differ by community type in three large s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9385670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35990409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101161 |
_version_ | 1784769640901115904 |
---|---|
author | McAlexander, Tara P. Malla, Gargya Uddin, Jalal Lee, David C. Schwartz, Brian S. Rolka, Deborah B. Siegel, Karen R. Kanchi, Rania Pollak, Jonathan Andes, Linda Carson, April P. Thorpe, Lorna E. McClure, Leslie A. |
author_facet | McAlexander, Tara P. Malla, Gargya Uddin, Jalal Lee, David C. Schwartz, Brian S. Rolka, Deborah B. Siegel, Karen R. Kanchi, Rania Pollak, Jonathan Andes, Linda Carson, April P. Thorpe, Lorna E. McClure, Leslie A. |
author_sort | McAlexander, Tara P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Geographic disparities in diabetes burden exist throughout the United States (US), with many risk factors for diabetes clustering at a community or neighborhood level. We hypothesized that the likelihood of new onset type 2 diabetes (T2D) would differ by community type in three large study samples covering the US. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We evaluated the likelihood of new onset T2D by a census tract-level measure of community type, a modification of RUCA designations (higher density urban, lower density urban, suburban/small town, and rural) in three longitudinal US study samples (REGARDS [REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke] cohort, VADR [Veterans Affairs Diabetes Risk] cohort, Geisinger electronic health records) representing the CDC Diabetes LEAD (Location, Environmental Attributes, and Disparities) Network. RESULTS: In the REGARDS sample, residing in higher density urban community types was associated with the lowest odds of new onset T2D (OR [95% CI]: 0.80 [0.66, 0.97]) compared to rural community types; in the Geisinger sample, residing in higher density urban community types was associated with the highest odds of new onset T2D (OR [95% CI]: 1.20 [1.06, 1.35]) compared to rural community types. In the VADR sample, suburban/small town community types had the lowest hazard ratios of new onset T2D (HR [95% CI]: 0.99 [0.98, 1.00]). However, in a regional stratified analysis of the VADR sample, the likelihood of new onset T2D was consistent with findings in the REGARDS and Geisinger samples, with highest likelihood of T2D in the rural South and in the higher density urban communities of the Northeast and West regions; likelihood of T2D did not differ by community type in the Midwest. CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of new onset T2D by community type varied by region of the US. In the South, the likelihood of new onset T2D was higher among those residing in rural communities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9385670 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93856702022-08-19 Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network McAlexander, Tara P. Malla, Gargya Uddin, Jalal Lee, David C. Schwartz, Brian S. Rolka, Deborah B. Siegel, Karen R. Kanchi, Rania Pollak, Jonathan Andes, Linda Carson, April P. Thorpe, Lorna E. McClure, Leslie A. SSM Popul Health Review Article INTRODUCTION: Geographic disparities in diabetes burden exist throughout the United States (US), with many risk factors for diabetes clustering at a community or neighborhood level. We hypothesized that the likelihood of new onset type 2 diabetes (T2D) would differ by community type in three large study samples covering the US. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We evaluated the likelihood of new onset T2D by a census tract-level measure of community type, a modification of RUCA designations (higher density urban, lower density urban, suburban/small town, and rural) in three longitudinal US study samples (REGARDS [REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke] cohort, VADR [Veterans Affairs Diabetes Risk] cohort, Geisinger electronic health records) representing the CDC Diabetes LEAD (Location, Environmental Attributes, and Disparities) Network. RESULTS: In the REGARDS sample, residing in higher density urban community types was associated with the lowest odds of new onset T2D (OR [95% CI]: 0.80 [0.66, 0.97]) compared to rural community types; in the Geisinger sample, residing in higher density urban community types was associated with the highest odds of new onset T2D (OR [95% CI]: 1.20 [1.06, 1.35]) compared to rural community types. In the VADR sample, suburban/small town community types had the lowest hazard ratios of new onset T2D (HR [95% CI]: 0.99 [0.98, 1.00]). However, in a regional stratified analysis of the VADR sample, the likelihood of new onset T2D was consistent with findings in the REGARDS and Geisinger samples, with highest likelihood of T2D in the rural South and in the higher density urban communities of the Northeast and West regions; likelihood of T2D did not differ by community type in the Midwest. CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of new onset T2D by community type varied by region of the US. In the South, the likelihood of new onset T2D was higher among those residing in rural communities. Elsevier 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9385670/ /pubmed/35990409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101161 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article McAlexander, Tara P. Malla, Gargya Uddin, Jalal Lee, David C. Schwartz, Brian S. Rolka, Deborah B. Siegel, Karen R. Kanchi, Rania Pollak, Jonathan Andes, Linda Carson, April P. Thorpe, Lorna E. McClure, Leslie A. Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network |
title | Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network |
title_full | Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network |
title_fullStr | Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network |
title_full_unstemmed | Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network |
title_short | Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network |
title_sort | urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes lead network |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9385670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35990409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101161 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcalexandertarap urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork AT mallagargya urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork AT uddinjalal urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork AT leedavidc urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork AT schwartzbrians urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork AT rolkadeborahb urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork AT siegelkarenr urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork AT kanchirania urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork AT pollakjonathan urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork AT andeslinda urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork AT carsonaprilp urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork AT thorpelornae urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork AT mcclurelesliea urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork |