Cargando…

Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network

INTRODUCTION: Geographic disparities in diabetes burden exist throughout the United States (US), with many risk factors for diabetes clustering at a community or neighborhood level. We hypothesized that the likelihood of new onset type 2 diabetes (T2D) would differ by community type in three large s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McAlexander, Tara P., Malla, Gargya, Uddin, Jalal, Lee, David C., Schwartz, Brian S., Rolka, Deborah B., Siegel, Karen R., Kanchi, Rania, Pollak, Jonathan, Andes, Linda, Carson, April P., Thorpe, Lorna E., McClure, Leslie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9385670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35990409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101161
_version_ 1784769640901115904
author McAlexander, Tara P.
Malla, Gargya
Uddin, Jalal
Lee, David C.
Schwartz, Brian S.
Rolka, Deborah B.
Siegel, Karen R.
Kanchi, Rania
Pollak, Jonathan
Andes, Linda
Carson, April P.
Thorpe, Lorna E.
McClure, Leslie A.
author_facet McAlexander, Tara P.
Malla, Gargya
Uddin, Jalal
Lee, David C.
Schwartz, Brian S.
Rolka, Deborah B.
Siegel, Karen R.
Kanchi, Rania
Pollak, Jonathan
Andes, Linda
Carson, April P.
Thorpe, Lorna E.
McClure, Leslie A.
author_sort McAlexander, Tara P.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Geographic disparities in diabetes burden exist throughout the United States (US), with many risk factors for diabetes clustering at a community or neighborhood level. We hypothesized that the likelihood of new onset type 2 diabetes (T2D) would differ by community type in three large study samples covering the US. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We evaluated the likelihood of new onset T2D by a census tract-level measure of community type, a modification of RUCA designations (higher density urban, lower density urban, suburban/small town, and rural) in three longitudinal US study samples (REGARDS [REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke] cohort, VADR [Veterans Affairs Diabetes Risk] cohort, Geisinger electronic health records) representing the CDC Diabetes LEAD (Location, Environmental Attributes, and Disparities) Network. RESULTS: In the REGARDS sample, residing in higher density urban community types was associated with the lowest odds of new onset T2D (OR [95% CI]: 0.80 [0.66, 0.97]) compared to rural community types; in the Geisinger sample, residing in higher density urban community types was associated with the highest odds of new onset T2D (OR [95% CI]: 1.20 [1.06, 1.35]) compared to rural community types. In the VADR sample, suburban/small town community types had the lowest hazard ratios of new onset T2D (HR [95% CI]: 0.99 [0.98, 1.00]). However, in a regional stratified analysis of the VADR sample, the likelihood of new onset T2D was consistent with findings in the REGARDS and Geisinger samples, with highest likelihood of T2D in the rural South and in the higher density urban communities of the Northeast and West regions; likelihood of T2D did not differ by community type in the Midwest. CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of new onset T2D by community type varied by region of the US. In the South, the likelihood of new onset T2D was higher among those residing in rural communities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9385670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93856702022-08-19 Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network McAlexander, Tara P. Malla, Gargya Uddin, Jalal Lee, David C. Schwartz, Brian S. Rolka, Deborah B. Siegel, Karen R. Kanchi, Rania Pollak, Jonathan Andes, Linda Carson, April P. Thorpe, Lorna E. McClure, Leslie A. SSM Popul Health Review Article INTRODUCTION: Geographic disparities in diabetes burden exist throughout the United States (US), with many risk factors for diabetes clustering at a community or neighborhood level. We hypothesized that the likelihood of new onset type 2 diabetes (T2D) would differ by community type in three large study samples covering the US. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We evaluated the likelihood of new onset T2D by a census tract-level measure of community type, a modification of RUCA designations (higher density urban, lower density urban, suburban/small town, and rural) in three longitudinal US study samples (REGARDS [REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke] cohort, VADR [Veterans Affairs Diabetes Risk] cohort, Geisinger electronic health records) representing the CDC Diabetes LEAD (Location, Environmental Attributes, and Disparities) Network. RESULTS: In the REGARDS sample, residing in higher density urban community types was associated with the lowest odds of new onset T2D (OR [95% CI]: 0.80 [0.66, 0.97]) compared to rural community types; in the Geisinger sample, residing in higher density urban community types was associated with the highest odds of new onset T2D (OR [95% CI]: 1.20 [1.06, 1.35]) compared to rural community types. In the VADR sample, suburban/small town community types had the lowest hazard ratios of new onset T2D (HR [95% CI]: 0.99 [0.98, 1.00]). However, in a regional stratified analysis of the VADR sample, the likelihood of new onset T2D was consistent with findings in the REGARDS and Geisinger samples, with highest likelihood of T2D in the rural South and in the higher density urban communities of the Northeast and West regions; likelihood of T2D did not differ by community type in the Midwest. CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of new onset T2D by community type varied by region of the US. In the South, the likelihood of new onset T2D was higher among those residing in rural communities. Elsevier 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9385670/ /pubmed/35990409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101161 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
McAlexander, Tara P.
Malla, Gargya
Uddin, Jalal
Lee, David C.
Schwartz, Brian S.
Rolka, Deborah B.
Siegel, Karen R.
Kanchi, Rania
Pollak, Jonathan
Andes, Linda
Carson, April P.
Thorpe, Lorna E.
McClure, Leslie A.
Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network
title Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network
title_full Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network
title_fullStr Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network
title_full_unstemmed Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network
title_short Urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: Comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes LEAD network
title_sort urban and rural differences in new onset type 2 diabetes: comparisons across national and regional samples in the diabetes lead network
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9385670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35990409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101161
work_keys_str_mv AT mcalexandertarap urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT mallagargya urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT uddinjalal urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT leedavidc urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT schwartzbrians urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT rolkadeborahb urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT siegelkarenr urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT kanchirania urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT pollakjonathan urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT andeslinda urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT carsonaprilp urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT thorpelornae urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork
AT mcclurelesliea urbanandruraldifferencesinnewonsettype2diabetescomparisonsacrossnationalandregionalsamplesinthediabetesleadnetwork