Cargando…

Gut microbiota activity in chickens from two genetic lines and with outdoor-preferring, moderate-preferring, and indoor-preferring ranging profiles

Despite the existing research into the gut microbiome of meat chickens, the associations between gut microbiome composition, its activity and chicken outdoor ranging frequency remain unexplored. The aim of this study was to determine the gut microbiota composition, activity and metabolic products in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sztandarski, Patryk, Marchewka, Joanna, Konieczka, Paweł, Zdanowska-Sąsiadek, Żaneta, Damaziak, Krzysztof, Riber, Anja B., Gunnarsson, Stefan, Horbańczuk, Jarosław Olav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9385685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35952604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102039
_version_ 1784769643155554304
author Sztandarski, Patryk
Marchewka, Joanna
Konieczka, Paweł
Zdanowska-Sąsiadek, Żaneta
Damaziak, Krzysztof
Riber, Anja B.
Gunnarsson, Stefan
Horbańczuk, Jarosław Olav
author_facet Sztandarski, Patryk
Marchewka, Joanna
Konieczka, Paweł
Zdanowska-Sąsiadek, Żaneta
Damaziak, Krzysztof
Riber, Anja B.
Gunnarsson, Stefan
Horbańczuk, Jarosław Olav
author_sort Sztandarski, Patryk
collection PubMed
description Despite the existing research into the gut microbiome of meat chickens, the associations between gut microbiome composition, its activity and chicken outdoor ranging frequency remain unexplored. The aim of this study was to determine the gut microbiota composition, activity and metabolic products in chickens of 2 different lines and 3 ranging profiles. Sixty non-beak trimmed birds, either Sasso or Green-legged Partridge were housed with access to outdoor ranges from wk. 5 to 10 of age. Outdoor ranges were video recorded to obtain frequencies of the birds’ range use. The information about relative abundance of selected bacterial groups in the ceca including Lactobacillus spp., E. coli, Bifidobacterium spp., and Clostridium spp. was obtained with the PCR method. Gut microbiota activity was assessed based on the glycolytic activity of bacterial enzymes including, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, and β-glucuronidase as well as based on the concentration of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) in the caecal digesta. Statistical analysis was conducted by generalized linear mixed models, applying the breed and ranging profile as fixed effects and pen as a random factor. The lowest relative abundance of Bifidobacterium spp. was found in the cecal content of indoor-preferring Sasso birds (0.01 ± 0.001), as compared to all other birds in the experiment (ranging from 0.03 ± 0.01 to 0.11 ± 0.07; P = 0.0002). The lowest relative abundance of E. coli was identified for all outdoor-preferring birds and indoor- preferring Sasso birds (0.01 ± 0.001; P = 0.0087). Cecal activity of: α-glucosidase, β-glucuronidase and β-galactosidase was higher in Green-legged Partridges, as compared to Sasso (P = 0.013; P = 0.008; P = 0.004). Valeric acid concentrations were higher in moderate Green-legged Partridges than in Sasso of the same ranging profile (2.03 ± 0.16 vs. 1.5 ± 0.17; 0.016). The majority of the current results confirmed an effect of genotype and ranging profile on the various analyzed parameters. In outdoor-preferring birds, the consumption of pasture originating feed sources as a supplement to the indoor accessible cereal-based diet likely caused the positive effects on the birds’ microbial profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9385685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93856852022-08-19 Gut microbiota activity in chickens from two genetic lines and with outdoor-preferring, moderate-preferring, and indoor-preferring ranging profiles Sztandarski, Patryk Marchewka, Joanna Konieczka, Paweł Zdanowska-Sąsiadek, Żaneta Damaziak, Krzysztof Riber, Anja B. Gunnarsson, Stefan Horbańczuk, Jarosław Olav Poult Sci Animal Well-Being and Behavior Despite the existing research into the gut microbiome of meat chickens, the associations between gut microbiome composition, its activity and chicken outdoor ranging frequency remain unexplored. The aim of this study was to determine the gut microbiota composition, activity and metabolic products in chickens of 2 different lines and 3 ranging profiles. Sixty non-beak trimmed birds, either Sasso or Green-legged Partridge were housed with access to outdoor ranges from wk. 5 to 10 of age. Outdoor ranges were video recorded to obtain frequencies of the birds’ range use. The information about relative abundance of selected bacterial groups in the ceca including Lactobacillus spp., E. coli, Bifidobacterium spp., and Clostridium spp. was obtained with the PCR method. Gut microbiota activity was assessed based on the glycolytic activity of bacterial enzymes including, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, and β-glucuronidase as well as based on the concentration of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) in the caecal digesta. Statistical analysis was conducted by generalized linear mixed models, applying the breed and ranging profile as fixed effects and pen as a random factor. The lowest relative abundance of Bifidobacterium spp. was found in the cecal content of indoor-preferring Sasso birds (0.01 ± 0.001), as compared to all other birds in the experiment (ranging from 0.03 ± 0.01 to 0.11 ± 0.07; P = 0.0002). The lowest relative abundance of E. coli was identified for all outdoor-preferring birds and indoor- preferring Sasso birds (0.01 ± 0.001; P = 0.0087). Cecal activity of: α-glucosidase, β-glucuronidase and β-galactosidase was higher in Green-legged Partridges, as compared to Sasso (P = 0.013; P = 0.008; P = 0.004). Valeric acid concentrations were higher in moderate Green-legged Partridges than in Sasso of the same ranging profile (2.03 ± 0.16 vs. 1.5 ± 0.17; 0.016). The majority of the current results confirmed an effect of genotype and ranging profile on the various analyzed parameters. In outdoor-preferring birds, the consumption of pasture originating feed sources as a supplement to the indoor accessible cereal-based diet likely caused the positive effects on the birds’ microbial profile. Elsevier 2022-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9385685/ /pubmed/35952604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102039 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Animal Well-Being and Behavior
Sztandarski, Patryk
Marchewka, Joanna
Konieczka, Paweł
Zdanowska-Sąsiadek, Żaneta
Damaziak, Krzysztof
Riber, Anja B.
Gunnarsson, Stefan
Horbańczuk, Jarosław Olav
Gut microbiota activity in chickens from two genetic lines and with outdoor-preferring, moderate-preferring, and indoor-preferring ranging profiles
title Gut microbiota activity in chickens from two genetic lines and with outdoor-preferring, moderate-preferring, and indoor-preferring ranging profiles
title_full Gut microbiota activity in chickens from two genetic lines and with outdoor-preferring, moderate-preferring, and indoor-preferring ranging profiles
title_fullStr Gut microbiota activity in chickens from two genetic lines and with outdoor-preferring, moderate-preferring, and indoor-preferring ranging profiles
title_full_unstemmed Gut microbiota activity in chickens from two genetic lines and with outdoor-preferring, moderate-preferring, and indoor-preferring ranging profiles
title_short Gut microbiota activity in chickens from two genetic lines and with outdoor-preferring, moderate-preferring, and indoor-preferring ranging profiles
title_sort gut microbiota activity in chickens from two genetic lines and with outdoor-preferring, moderate-preferring, and indoor-preferring ranging profiles
topic Animal Well-Being and Behavior
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9385685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35952604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102039
work_keys_str_mv AT sztandarskipatryk gutmicrobiotaactivityinchickensfromtwogeneticlinesandwithoutdoorpreferringmoderatepreferringandindoorpreferringrangingprofiles
AT marchewkajoanna gutmicrobiotaactivityinchickensfromtwogeneticlinesandwithoutdoorpreferringmoderatepreferringandindoorpreferringrangingprofiles
AT konieczkapaweł gutmicrobiotaactivityinchickensfromtwogeneticlinesandwithoutdoorpreferringmoderatepreferringandindoorpreferringrangingprofiles
AT zdanowskasasiadekzaneta gutmicrobiotaactivityinchickensfromtwogeneticlinesandwithoutdoorpreferringmoderatepreferringandindoorpreferringrangingprofiles
AT damaziakkrzysztof gutmicrobiotaactivityinchickensfromtwogeneticlinesandwithoutdoorpreferringmoderatepreferringandindoorpreferringrangingprofiles
AT riberanjab gutmicrobiotaactivityinchickensfromtwogeneticlinesandwithoutdoorpreferringmoderatepreferringandindoorpreferringrangingprofiles
AT gunnarssonstefan gutmicrobiotaactivityinchickensfromtwogeneticlinesandwithoutdoorpreferringmoderatepreferringandindoorpreferringrangingprofiles
AT horbanczukjarosławolav gutmicrobiotaactivityinchickensfromtwogeneticlinesandwithoutdoorpreferringmoderatepreferringandindoorpreferringrangingprofiles