Cargando…

The Value of Dynamic Fracture Mobility in Determining the Optimum Operation Choice for Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture

PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to verify whether the use of a balloon in balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) could offer a higher degree of vertebral height restoration and deformity correction than percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) after adjustment for preoperative dynamic fracture mobility. We expe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ren, Hu, Feng, Tao, Hu, Yaning, Yao, Guangqing, Yu, Dahai, Cao, Jianhui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9386056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35992249
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S368493
_version_ 1784769717157756928
author Ren, Hu
Feng, Tao
Hu, Yaning
Yao, Guangqing
Yu, Dahai
Cao, Jianhui
author_facet Ren, Hu
Feng, Tao
Hu, Yaning
Yao, Guangqing
Yu, Dahai
Cao, Jianhui
author_sort Ren, Hu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to verify whether the use of a balloon in balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) could offer a higher degree of vertebral height restoration and deformity correction than percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) after adjustment for preoperative dynamic fracture mobility. We expect that this research will help surgeons to determine the optimum operation choice (PVP or BKP) for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated retrospectively 262 patients who were treated by PVP or BKP for acute, single-level OVCF at our institution from July 2015 to July 2019. According to the presence or absence of dynamic fracture mobility, the patients were divided into two groups: mobile group and fixed group. We compared the changes in the vertebral height and kyphotic angle for PVP and BKP, respectively, within each group. RESULTS: In the mobile group, the anterior vertebral height restoration (BKP group, 8.73±5.27%; PVP group, 2.96±1.59%), middle vertebral height restoration (BKP group, 7.58±5.18%; PVP group, 2.74±1.24%) and kyphotic angle correction (BKP group, 4.41±4.46°; PVP group, 1.38±1.60°) due to percutaneous vertebral augmentation technique itself were more obvious in BKP group compared with PVP group (P < 0.05). The BKP group has lower incidence of bone cement leakage (BKP group, 10.17%; PVP group, 25.53%, P < 0.05). In the fixed group, differences from comparison of changes were not statistically significant between PVP and BKP (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of a balloon in BKP could offer greater kyphosis correction, higher vertebral body height restoration, and lower cement leakage rate than PVP if a fractured vertebral body existed dynamic mobility. However, all these advantages of BKP over PVP are not obvious and could be overrated for a fixed fracture exhibited no mobility. BKP is recommended for a fractured vertebral body with dynamic mobility. PVP is suggested for a fixed fractured vertebral body with no mobility as it produces similar capability of vertebral height restoration, kyphosis correction, and cement leakage as BKP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9386056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93860562022-08-19 The Value of Dynamic Fracture Mobility in Determining the Optimum Operation Choice for Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture Ren, Hu Feng, Tao Hu, Yaning Yao, Guangqing Yu, Dahai Cao, Jianhui J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to verify whether the use of a balloon in balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) could offer a higher degree of vertebral height restoration and deformity correction than percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) after adjustment for preoperative dynamic fracture mobility. We expect that this research will help surgeons to determine the optimum operation choice (PVP or BKP) for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated retrospectively 262 patients who were treated by PVP or BKP for acute, single-level OVCF at our institution from July 2015 to July 2019. According to the presence or absence of dynamic fracture mobility, the patients were divided into two groups: mobile group and fixed group. We compared the changes in the vertebral height and kyphotic angle for PVP and BKP, respectively, within each group. RESULTS: In the mobile group, the anterior vertebral height restoration (BKP group, 8.73±5.27%; PVP group, 2.96±1.59%), middle vertebral height restoration (BKP group, 7.58±5.18%; PVP group, 2.74±1.24%) and kyphotic angle correction (BKP group, 4.41±4.46°; PVP group, 1.38±1.60°) due to percutaneous vertebral augmentation technique itself were more obvious in BKP group compared with PVP group (P < 0.05). The BKP group has lower incidence of bone cement leakage (BKP group, 10.17%; PVP group, 25.53%, P < 0.05). In the fixed group, differences from comparison of changes were not statistically significant between PVP and BKP (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of a balloon in BKP could offer greater kyphosis correction, higher vertebral body height restoration, and lower cement leakage rate than PVP if a fractured vertebral body existed dynamic mobility. However, all these advantages of BKP over PVP are not obvious and could be overrated for a fixed fracture exhibited no mobility. BKP is recommended for a fractured vertebral body with dynamic mobility. PVP is suggested for a fixed fractured vertebral body with no mobility as it produces similar capability of vertebral height restoration, kyphosis correction, and cement leakage as BKP. Dove 2022-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9386056/ /pubmed/35992249 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S368493 Text en © 2022 Ren et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ren, Hu
Feng, Tao
Hu, Yaning
Yao, Guangqing
Yu, Dahai
Cao, Jianhui
The Value of Dynamic Fracture Mobility in Determining the Optimum Operation Choice for Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture
title The Value of Dynamic Fracture Mobility in Determining the Optimum Operation Choice for Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture
title_full The Value of Dynamic Fracture Mobility in Determining the Optimum Operation Choice for Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture
title_fullStr The Value of Dynamic Fracture Mobility in Determining the Optimum Operation Choice for Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture
title_full_unstemmed The Value of Dynamic Fracture Mobility in Determining the Optimum Operation Choice for Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture
title_short The Value of Dynamic Fracture Mobility in Determining the Optimum Operation Choice for Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture
title_sort value of dynamic fracture mobility in determining the optimum operation choice for acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9386056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35992249
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S368493
work_keys_str_mv AT renhu thevalueofdynamicfracturemobilityindeterminingtheoptimumoperationchoiceforacuteosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracture
AT fengtao thevalueofdynamicfracturemobilityindeterminingtheoptimumoperationchoiceforacuteosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracture
AT huyaning thevalueofdynamicfracturemobilityindeterminingtheoptimumoperationchoiceforacuteosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracture
AT yaoguangqing thevalueofdynamicfracturemobilityindeterminingtheoptimumoperationchoiceforacuteosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracture
AT yudahai thevalueofdynamicfracturemobilityindeterminingtheoptimumoperationchoiceforacuteosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracture
AT caojianhui thevalueofdynamicfracturemobilityindeterminingtheoptimumoperationchoiceforacuteosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracture
AT renhu valueofdynamicfracturemobilityindeterminingtheoptimumoperationchoiceforacuteosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracture
AT fengtao valueofdynamicfracturemobilityindeterminingtheoptimumoperationchoiceforacuteosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracture
AT huyaning valueofdynamicfracturemobilityindeterminingtheoptimumoperationchoiceforacuteosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracture
AT yaoguangqing valueofdynamicfracturemobilityindeterminingtheoptimumoperationchoiceforacuteosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracture
AT yudahai valueofdynamicfracturemobilityindeterminingtheoptimumoperationchoiceforacuteosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracture
AT caojianhui valueofdynamicfracturemobilityindeterminingtheoptimumoperationchoiceforacuteosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracture