Cargando…

Comparison of three malnutrition risk screening tools in identifying malnutrition according to Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria in gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is common in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The first step in the diagnosis of malnutrition is to evaluate the malnutrition risk by validated screening tools according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM). This study aimed to determine the best...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Yangyang, Chen, Ying, Wei, Lu, Hu, Yan, Huang, Liya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9386177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35990353
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.959038
_version_ 1784769745125376000
author Huang, Yangyang
Chen, Ying
Wei, Lu
Hu, Yan
Huang, Liya
author_facet Huang, Yangyang
Chen, Ying
Wei, Lu
Hu, Yan
Huang, Liya
author_sort Huang, Yangyang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is common in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The first step in the diagnosis of malnutrition is to evaluate the malnutrition risk by validated screening tools according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM). This study aimed to determine the best nutritional screening tool for identifying GLIM malnutrition and validate the performance of these tools in different age subgroups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We did a prospective cohort study of patients who were diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer from February 2016 to November 2019. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of three screening tools (Nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), MNA-SF) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 488 patients were enrolled, and 138 patients (28.27%) were malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria. The consistency of NRS 2002, GNRI, and MNA-SF with GLIM-defined malnutrition was 74.8, 72.1, and 71.1%, respectively. In the subgroup analysis of young patients (<65 years), NRS 2002 exhibited the best discrimination with the AUC of 0.724 (95% CI, 0.567–0.882), the sensitivity of 64.3% (95% CI, 35.6–86.0), and the specificity of 80.6% (95% CI, 69.2–88.6). In patients older than 65 years, MNA-SF exhibited the best discrimination with the AUC of 0.764 (95% CI, 0.714–0.814), the sensitivity of 82.3% (95% CI, 74.1–88.3), and the specificity of 70.5% (95% CI, 64.7–75.7). CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002) is the best malnutrition screening tool in gastrointestinal cancer patients younger than 65 years, and MNA-SF is the best malnutrition screening tool in patients older than 65 years. It is necessary to select targeted nutritional screening tools according to the difference in age.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9386177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93861772022-08-19 Comparison of three malnutrition risk screening tools in identifying malnutrition according to Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria in gastrointestinal cancer Huang, Yangyang Chen, Ying Wei, Lu Hu, Yan Huang, Liya Front Nutr Nutrition BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is common in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The first step in the diagnosis of malnutrition is to evaluate the malnutrition risk by validated screening tools according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM). This study aimed to determine the best nutritional screening tool for identifying GLIM malnutrition and validate the performance of these tools in different age subgroups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We did a prospective cohort study of patients who were diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer from February 2016 to November 2019. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of three screening tools (Nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), MNA-SF) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 488 patients were enrolled, and 138 patients (28.27%) were malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria. The consistency of NRS 2002, GNRI, and MNA-SF with GLIM-defined malnutrition was 74.8, 72.1, and 71.1%, respectively. In the subgroup analysis of young patients (<65 years), NRS 2002 exhibited the best discrimination with the AUC of 0.724 (95% CI, 0.567–0.882), the sensitivity of 64.3% (95% CI, 35.6–86.0), and the specificity of 80.6% (95% CI, 69.2–88.6). In patients older than 65 years, MNA-SF exhibited the best discrimination with the AUC of 0.764 (95% CI, 0.714–0.814), the sensitivity of 82.3% (95% CI, 74.1–88.3), and the specificity of 70.5% (95% CI, 64.7–75.7). CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002) is the best malnutrition screening tool in gastrointestinal cancer patients younger than 65 years, and MNA-SF is the best malnutrition screening tool in patients older than 65 years. It is necessary to select targeted nutritional screening tools according to the difference in age. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9386177/ /pubmed/35990353 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.959038 Text en Copyright © 2022 Huang, Chen, Wei, Hu and Huang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Huang, Yangyang
Chen, Ying
Wei, Lu
Hu, Yan
Huang, Liya
Comparison of three malnutrition risk screening tools in identifying malnutrition according to Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria in gastrointestinal cancer
title Comparison of three malnutrition risk screening tools in identifying malnutrition according to Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria in gastrointestinal cancer
title_full Comparison of three malnutrition risk screening tools in identifying malnutrition according to Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria in gastrointestinal cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of three malnutrition risk screening tools in identifying malnutrition according to Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria in gastrointestinal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three malnutrition risk screening tools in identifying malnutrition according to Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria in gastrointestinal cancer
title_short Comparison of three malnutrition risk screening tools in identifying malnutrition according to Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria in gastrointestinal cancer
title_sort comparison of three malnutrition risk screening tools in identifying malnutrition according to global leadership initiative on malnutrition criteria in gastrointestinal cancer
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9386177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35990353
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.959038
work_keys_str_mv AT huangyangyang comparisonofthreemalnutritionriskscreeningtoolsinidentifyingmalnutritionaccordingtogloballeadershipinitiativeonmalnutritioncriteriaingastrointestinalcancer
AT chenying comparisonofthreemalnutritionriskscreeningtoolsinidentifyingmalnutritionaccordingtogloballeadershipinitiativeonmalnutritioncriteriaingastrointestinalcancer
AT weilu comparisonofthreemalnutritionriskscreeningtoolsinidentifyingmalnutritionaccordingtogloballeadershipinitiativeonmalnutritioncriteriaingastrointestinalcancer
AT huyan comparisonofthreemalnutritionriskscreeningtoolsinidentifyingmalnutritionaccordingtogloballeadershipinitiativeonmalnutritioncriteriaingastrointestinalcancer
AT huangliya comparisonofthreemalnutritionriskscreeningtoolsinidentifyingmalnutritionaccordingtogloballeadershipinitiativeonmalnutritioncriteriaingastrointestinalcancer