Cargando…

Changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has become a safe and effective option for heart failure (HF) patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and/or ventricular pacing, yet the response rate was only 70%. Repolarization parameters were demonstrated to be associated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yao, Lu, Wenzhao, Hu, Qingyun, Cheng, Chendi, Lin, Jinxuan, Zhou, Yu’an, Chen, Ruohan, Dai, Yan, Chen, Keping, Zhang, Shu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9386224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35991167
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.912126
_version_ 1784769756693266432
author Li, Yao
Lu, Wenzhao
Hu, Qingyun
Cheng, Chendi
Lin, Jinxuan
Zhou, Yu’an
Chen, Ruohan
Dai, Yan
Chen, Keping
Zhang, Shu
author_facet Li, Yao
Lu, Wenzhao
Hu, Qingyun
Cheng, Chendi
Lin, Jinxuan
Zhou, Yu’an
Chen, Ruohan
Dai, Yan
Chen, Keping
Zhang, Shu
author_sort Li, Yao
collection PubMed
description Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has become a safe and effective option for heart failure (HF) patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and/or ventricular pacing, yet the response rate was only 70%. Repolarization parameters were demonstrated to be associated with cardiac mechanics and systolic function. This study aimed to investigate the effects of LBBAP on repolarization parameters and the potential association between those parameters and echocardiographic response. Methods and results: A total of 59 HF patients undergoing successful LBBAP were consecutively included. QTc, Tpeak-Tend (TpTe), and TpTe/QTc were measured before and after the implantation. The results turned out that the dispersion of ventricular repolarization (DVR) improved after LBBAP among the total population. Although trends of repolarization parameters varied according to different QRS configurations at baseline, the post-implant parameters showed no significant difference between groups. The association between repolarization parameters and LBBAP response was then evaluated among patients with wide QRS. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that post-implant TpTe was the independent predictor of LBBAP response (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated an area under the curve of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60–0.93) with a cutoff value of 81.2 ms (p < 0.01). Patients with post-implant TpTe<81.2 ms had a significantly higher rate of echocardiographic response (93.3 vs. 44.4%, p < 0.01). Further subgroup analysis indicated that the predictive value of post-implant TpTe for LBBAP response was more significant in non-left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients than in LBBB patients. Conclusion: LBBAP improved DVR significantly in HF patients. Post-implant TpTe was associated with the echocardiographic response after LBBAP among patients with wide QRS, especially for non-LBBB patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9386224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93862242022-08-19 Changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients Li, Yao Lu, Wenzhao Hu, Qingyun Cheng, Chendi Lin, Jinxuan Zhou, Yu’an Chen, Ruohan Dai, Yan Chen, Keping Zhang, Shu Front Physiol Physiology Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has become a safe and effective option for heart failure (HF) patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and/or ventricular pacing, yet the response rate was only 70%. Repolarization parameters were demonstrated to be associated with cardiac mechanics and systolic function. This study aimed to investigate the effects of LBBAP on repolarization parameters and the potential association between those parameters and echocardiographic response. Methods and results: A total of 59 HF patients undergoing successful LBBAP were consecutively included. QTc, Tpeak-Tend (TpTe), and TpTe/QTc were measured before and after the implantation. The results turned out that the dispersion of ventricular repolarization (DVR) improved after LBBAP among the total population. Although trends of repolarization parameters varied according to different QRS configurations at baseline, the post-implant parameters showed no significant difference between groups. The association between repolarization parameters and LBBAP response was then evaluated among patients with wide QRS. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that post-implant TpTe was the independent predictor of LBBAP response (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated an area under the curve of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60–0.93) with a cutoff value of 81.2 ms (p < 0.01). Patients with post-implant TpTe<81.2 ms had a significantly higher rate of echocardiographic response (93.3 vs. 44.4%, p < 0.01). Further subgroup analysis indicated that the predictive value of post-implant TpTe for LBBAP response was more significant in non-left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients than in LBBB patients. Conclusion: LBBAP improved DVR significantly in HF patients. Post-implant TpTe was associated with the echocardiographic response after LBBAP among patients with wide QRS, especially for non-LBBB patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9386224/ /pubmed/35991167 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.912126 Text en Copyright © 2022 Li, Lu, Hu, Cheng, Lin, Zhou, Chen, Dai, Chen and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Li, Yao
Lu, Wenzhao
Hu, Qingyun
Cheng, Chendi
Lin, Jinxuan
Zhou, Yu’an
Chen, Ruohan
Dai, Yan
Chen, Keping
Zhang, Shu
Changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients
title Changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients
title_full Changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients
title_fullStr Changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients
title_full_unstemmed Changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients
title_short Changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients
title_sort changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9386224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35991167
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.912126
work_keys_str_mv AT liyao changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients
AT luwenzhao changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients
AT huqingyun changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients
AT chengchendi changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients
AT linjinxuan changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients
AT zhouyuan changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients
AT chenruohan changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients
AT daiyan changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients
AT chenkeping changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients
AT zhangshu changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients