Cargando…
Changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients
Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has become a safe and effective option for heart failure (HF) patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and/or ventricular pacing, yet the response rate was only 70%. Repolarization parameters were demonstrated to be associated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9386224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35991167 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.912126 |
_version_ | 1784769756693266432 |
---|---|
author | Li, Yao Lu, Wenzhao Hu, Qingyun Cheng, Chendi Lin, Jinxuan Zhou, Yu’an Chen, Ruohan Dai, Yan Chen, Keping Zhang, Shu |
author_facet | Li, Yao Lu, Wenzhao Hu, Qingyun Cheng, Chendi Lin, Jinxuan Zhou, Yu’an Chen, Ruohan Dai, Yan Chen, Keping Zhang, Shu |
author_sort | Li, Yao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has become a safe and effective option for heart failure (HF) patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and/or ventricular pacing, yet the response rate was only 70%. Repolarization parameters were demonstrated to be associated with cardiac mechanics and systolic function. This study aimed to investigate the effects of LBBAP on repolarization parameters and the potential association between those parameters and echocardiographic response. Methods and results: A total of 59 HF patients undergoing successful LBBAP were consecutively included. QTc, Tpeak-Tend (TpTe), and TpTe/QTc were measured before and after the implantation. The results turned out that the dispersion of ventricular repolarization (DVR) improved after LBBAP among the total population. Although trends of repolarization parameters varied according to different QRS configurations at baseline, the post-implant parameters showed no significant difference between groups. The association between repolarization parameters and LBBAP response was then evaluated among patients with wide QRS. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that post-implant TpTe was the independent predictor of LBBAP response (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated an area under the curve of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60–0.93) with a cutoff value of 81.2 ms (p < 0.01). Patients with post-implant TpTe<81.2 ms had a significantly higher rate of echocardiographic response (93.3 vs. 44.4%, p < 0.01). Further subgroup analysis indicated that the predictive value of post-implant TpTe for LBBAP response was more significant in non-left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients than in LBBB patients. Conclusion: LBBAP improved DVR significantly in HF patients. Post-implant TpTe was associated with the echocardiographic response after LBBAP among patients with wide QRS, especially for non-LBBB patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9386224 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93862242022-08-19 Changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients Li, Yao Lu, Wenzhao Hu, Qingyun Cheng, Chendi Lin, Jinxuan Zhou, Yu’an Chen, Ruohan Dai, Yan Chen, Keping Zhang, Shu Front Physiol Physiology Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has become a safe and effective option for heart failure (HF) patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and/or ventricular pacing, yet the response rate was only 70%. Repolarization parameters were demonstrated to be associated with cardiac mechanics and systolic function. This study aimed to investigate the effects of LBBAP on repolarization parameters and the potential association between those parameters and echocardiographic response. Methods and results: A total of 59 HF patients undergoing successful LBBAP were consecutively included. QTc, Tpeak-Tend (TpTe), and TpTe/QTc were measured before and after the implantation. The results turned out that the dispersion of ventricular repolarization (DVR) improved after LBBAP among the total population. Although trends of repolarization parameters varied according to different QRS configurations at baseline, the post-implant parameters showed no significant difference between groups. The association between repolarization parameters and LBBAP response was then evaluated among patients with wide QRS. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that post-implant TpTe was the independent predictor of LBBAP response (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated an area under the curve of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60–0.93) with a cutoff value of 81.2 ms (p < 0.01). Patients with post-implant TpTe<81.2 ms had a significantly higher rate of echocardiographic response (93.3 vs. 44.4%, p < 0.01). Further subgroup analysis indicated that the predictive value of post-implant TpTe for LBBAP response was more significant in non-left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients than in LBBB patients. Conclusion: LBBAP improved DVR significantly in HF patients. Post-implant TpTe was associated with the echocardiographic response after LBBAP among patients with wide QRS, especially for non-LBBB patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9386224/ /pubmed/35991167 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.912126 Text en Copyright © 2022 Li, Lu, Hu, Cheng, Lin, Zhou, Chen, Dai, Chen and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Li, Yao Lu, Wenzhao Hu, Qingyun Cheng, Chendi Lin, Jinxuan Zhou, Yu’an Chen, Ruohan Dai, Yan Chen, Keping Zhang, Shu Changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients |
title | Changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients |
title_full | Changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients |
title_fullStr | Changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients |
title_short | Changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients |
title_sort | changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9386224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35991167 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.912126 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liyao changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients AT luwenzhao changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients AT huqingyun changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients AT chengchendi changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients AT linjinxuan changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients AT zhouyuan changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients AT chenruohan changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients AT daiyan changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients AT chenkeping changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients AT zhangshu changesofrepolarizationparametersafterleftbundlebranchareapacingandtheassociationwithechocardiographicresponseinheartfailurepatients |