Cargando…

Patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: A screening approach using artificial intelligence

BACKGROUND: Corneal topography is a clinically validated examination method for keratoconus. However, there is no clear guideline regarding patient selection for corneal topography. We developed and validated a novel artificial intelligence (AI) model to identify patients who would benefit from corn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahn, Hyunmin, Kim, Na Eun, Chung, Jae Lim, Kim, Young Jun, Jun, Ikhyun, Kim, Tae-im, Seo, Kyoung Yul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9386450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35991660
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.934865
_version_ 1784769813834366976
author Ahn, Hyunmin
Kim, Na Eun
Chung, Jae Lim
Kim, Young Jun
Jun, Ikhyun
Kim, Tae-im
Seo, Kyoung Yul
author_facet Ahn, Hyunmin
Kim, Na Eun
Chung, Jae Lim
Kim, Young Jun
Jun, Ikhyun
Kim, Tae-im
Seo, Kyoung Yul
author_sort Ahn, Hyunmin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Corneal topography is a clinically validated examination method for keratoconus. However, there is no clear guideline regarding patient selection for corneal topography. We developed and validated a novel artificial intelligence (AI) model to identify patients who would benefit from corneal topography based on basic ophthalmologic examinations, including a survey of visual impairment, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, and autokeratometry. METHODS: A total of five AI models (three individual models with fully connected neural network including the XGBoost, and the TabNet models, and two ensemble models with hard and soft voting methods) were trained and validated. We used three datasets collected from the records of 2,613 patients' basic ophthalmologic examinations from two institutions to train and validate the AI models. We trained the AI models using a dataset from a third medical institution to determine whether corneal topography was needed to detect keratoconus. Finally, prospective intra-validation dataset (internal test dataset) and extra-validation dataset from a different medical institution (external test dataset) were used to assess the performance of the AI models. RESULTS: The ensemble model with soft voting method outperformed all other AI models in sensitivity when predicting which patients needed corneal topography (90.5% in internal test dataset and 96.4% in external test dataset). In the error analysis, most of the predicting error occurred within the range of the subclinical keratoconus and the suspicious D-score in the Belin-Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display. In the feature importance analysis, out of 18 features, IOP was the highest ranked feature when comparing the average value of the relative attributions of three individual AI models, followed by the difference in the value of mean corneal power. CONCLUSION: An AI model using the results of basic ophthalmologic examination has the potential to recommend corneal topography for keratoconus. In this AI algorithm, IOP and the difference between the two eyes, which may be undervalued clinical information, were important factors in the success of the AI model, and may be worth further reviewing in research and clinical practice for keratoconus screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9386450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93864502022-08-19 Patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: A screening approach using artificial intelligence Ahn, Hyunmin Kim, Na Eun Chung, Jae Lim Kim, Young Jun Jun, Ikhyun Kim, Tae-im Seo, Kyoung Yul Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Corneal topography is a clinically validated examination method for keratoconus. However, there is no clear guideline regarding patient selection for corneal topography. We developed and validated a novel artificial intelligence (AI) model to identify patients who would benefit from corneal topography based on basic ophthalmologic examinations, including a survey of visual impairment, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, and autokeratometry. METHODS: A total of five AI models (three individual models with fully connected neural network including the XGBoost, and the TabNet models, and two ensemble models with hard and soft voting methods) were trained and validated. We used three datasets collected from the records of 2,613 patients' basic ophthalmologic examinations from two institutions to train and validate the AI models. We trained the AI models using a dataset from a third medical institution to determine whether corneal topography was needed to detect keratoconus. Finally, prospective intra-validation dataset (internal test dataset) and extra-validation dataset from a different medical institution (external test dataset) were used to assess the performance of the AI models. RESULTS: The ensemble model with soft voting method outperformed all other AI models in sensitivity when predicting which patients needed corneal topography (90.5% in internal test dataset and 96.4% in external test dataset). In the error analysis, most of the predicting error occurred within the range of the subclinical keratoconus and the suspicious D-score in the Belin-Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display. In the feature importance analysis, out of 18 features, IOP was the highest ranked feature when comparing the average value of the relative attributions of three individual AI models, followed by the difference in the value of mean corneal power. CONCLUSION: An AI model using the results of basic ophthalmologic examination has the potential to recommend corneal topography for keratoconus. In this AI algorithm, IOP and the difference between the two eyes, which may be undervalued clinical information, were important factors in the success of the AI model, and may be worth further reviewing in research and clinical practice for keratoconus screening. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9386450/ /pubmed/35991660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.934865 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ahn, Kim, Chung, Kim, Jun, Kim and Seo. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Ahn, Hyunmin
Kim, Na Eun
Chung, Jae Lim
Kim, Young Jun
Jun, Ikhyun
Kim, Tae-im
Seo, Kyoung Yul
Patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: A screening approach using artificial intelligence
title Patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: A screening approach using artificial intelligence
title_full Patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: A screening approach using artificial intelligence
title_fullStr Patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: A screening approach using artificial intelligence
title_full_unstemmed Patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: A screening approach using artificial intelligence
title_short Patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: A screening approach using artificial intelligence
title_sort patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: a screening approach using artificial intelligence
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9386450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35991660
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.934865
work_keys_str_mv AT ahnhyunmin patientselectionforcornealtopographicevaluationofkeratoconusascreeningapproachusingartificialintelligence
AT kimnaeun patientselectionforcornealtopographicevaluationofkeratoconusascreeningapproachusingartificialintelligence
AT chungjaelim patientselectionforcornealtopographicevaluationofkeratoconusascreeningapproachusingartificialintelligence
AT kimyoungjun patientselectionforcornealtopographicevaluationofkeratoconusascreeningapproachusingartificialintelligence
AT junikhyun patientselectionforcornealtopographicevaluationofkeratoconusascreeningapproachusingartificialintelligence
AT kimtaeim patientselectionforcornealtopographicevaluationofkeratoconusascreeningapproachusingartificialintelligence
AT seokyoungyul patientselectionforcornealtopographicevaluationofkeratoconusascreeningapproachusingartificialintelligence