Cargando…
Patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: A screening approach using artificial intelligence
BACKGROUND: Corneal topography is a clinically validated examination method for keratoconus. However, there is no clear guideline regarding patient selection for corneal topography. We developed and validated a novel artificial intelligence (AI) model to identify patients who would benefit from corn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9386450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35991660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.934865 |
_version_ | 1784769813834366976 |
---|---|
author | Ahn, Hyunmin Kim, Na Eun Chung, Jae Lim Kim, Young Jun Jun, Ikhyun Kim, Tae-im Seo, Kyoung Yul |
author_facet | Ahn, Hyunmin Kim, Na Eun Chung, Jae Lim Kim, Young Jun Jun, Ikhyun Kim, Tae-im Seo, Kyoung Yul |
author_sort | Ahn, Hyunmin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Corneal topography is a clinically validated examination method for keratoconus. However, there is no clear guideline regarding patient selection for corneal topography. We developed and validated a novel artificial intelligence (AI) model to identify patients who would benefit from corneal topography based on basic ophthalmologic examinations, including a survey of visual impairment, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, and autokeratometry. METHODS: A total of five AI models (three individual models with fully connected neural network including the XGBoost, and the TabNet models, and two ensemble models with hard and soft voting methods) were trained and validated. We used three datasets collected from the records of 2,613 patients' basic ophthalmologic examinations from two institutions to train and validate the AI models. We trained the AI models using a dataset from a third medical institution to determine whether corneal topography was needed to detect keratoconus. Finally, prospective intra-validation dataset (internal test dataset) and extra-validation dataset from a different medical institution (external test dataset) were used to assess the performance of the AI models. RESULTS: The ensemble model with soft voting method outperformed all other AI models in sensitivity when predicting which patients needed corneal topography (90.5% in internal test dataset and 96.4% in external test dataset). In the error analysis, most of the predicting error occurred within the range of the subclinical keratoconus and the suspicious D-score in the Belin-Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display. In the feature importance analysis, out of 18 features, IOP was the highest ranked feature when comparing the average value of the relative attributions of three individual AI models, followed by the difference in the value of mean corneal power. CONCLUSION: An AI model using the results of basic ophthalmologic examination has the potential to recommend corneal topography for keratoconus. In this AI algorithm, IOP and the difference between the two eyes, which may be undervalued clinical information, were important factors in the success of the AI model, and may be worth further reviewing in research and clinical practice for keratoconus screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9386450 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93864502022-08-19 Patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: A screening approach using artificial intelligence Ahn, Hyunmin Kim, Na Eun Chung, Jae Lim Kim, Young Jun Jun, Ikhyun Kim, Tae-im Seo, Kyoung Yul Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Corneal topography is a clinically validated examination method for keratoconus. However, there is no clear guideline regarding patient selection for corneal topography. We developed and validated a novel artificial intelligence (AI) model to identify patients who would benefit from corneal topography based on basic ophthalmologic examinations, including a survey of visual impairment, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, and autokeratometry. METHODS: A total of five AI models (three individual models with fully connected neural network including the XGBoost, and the TabNet models, and two ensemble models with hard and soft voting methods) were trained and validated. We used three datasets collected from the records of 2,613 patients' basic ophthalmologic examinations from two institutions to train and validate the AI models. We trained the AI models using a dataset from a third medical institution to determine whether corneal topography was needed to detect keratoconus. Finally, prospective intra-validation dataset (internal test dataset) and extra-validation dataset from a different medical institution (external test dataset) were used to assess the performance of the AI models. RESULTS: The ensemble model with soft voting method outperformed all other AI models in sensitivity when predicting which patients needed corneal topography (90.5% in internal test dataset and 96.4% in external test dataset). In the error analysis, most of the predicting error occurred within the range of the subclinical keratoconus and the suspicious D-score in the Belin-Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display. In the feature importance analysis, out of 18 features, IOP was the highest ranked feature when comparing the average value of the relative attributions of three individual AI models, followed by the difference in the value of mean corneal power. CONCLUSION: An AI model using the results of basic ophthalmologic examination has the potential to recommend corneal topography for keratoconus. In this AI algorithm, IOP and the difference between the two eyes, which may be undervalued clinical information, were important factors in the success of the AI model, and may be worth further reviewing in research and clinical practice for keratoconus screening. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9386450/ /pubmed/35991660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.934865 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ahn, Kim, Chung, Kim, Jun, Kim and Seo. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Ahn, Hyunmin Kim, Na Eun Chung, Jae Lim Kim, Young Jun Jun, Ikhyun Kim, Tae-im Seo, Kyoung Yul Patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: A screening approach using artificial intelligence |
title | Patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: A screening approach using artificial intelligence |
title_full | Patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: A screening approach using artificial intelligence |
title_fullStr | Patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: A screening approach using artificial intelligence |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: A screening approach using artificial intelligence |
title_short | Patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: A screening approach using artificial intelligence |
title_sort | patient selection for corneal topographic evaluation of keratoconus: a screening approach using artificial intelligence |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9386450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35991660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.934865 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahnhyunmin patientselectionforcornealtopographicevaluationofkeratoconusascreeningapproachusingartificialintelligence AT kimnaeun patientselectionforcornealtopographicevaluationofkeratoconusascreeningapproachusingartificialintelligence AT chungjaelim patientselectionforcornealtopographicevaluationofkeratoconusascreeningapproachusingartificialintelligence AT kimyoungjun patientselectionforcornealtopographicevaluationofkeratoconusascreeningapproachusingartificialintelligence AT junikhyun patientselectionforcornealtopographicevaluationofkeratoconusascreeningapproachusingartificialintelligence AT kimtaeim patientselectionforcornealtopographicevaluationofkeratoconusascreeningapproachusingartificialintelligence AT seokyoungyul patientselectionforcornealtopographicevaluationofkeratoconusascreeningapproachusingartificialintelligence |