Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease: A meta-analysis
Ruxolitinib is an important treatment for steroid refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD). Therefore, we reported the updated results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of ruxolitinib as treatment for SR-GVHD. In addition, we wanted to compare the efficacy and safety between children an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9386528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35990629 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.954268 |
_version_ | 1784769832578711552 |
---|---|
author | Fan, Shuang Huo, Wen-Xuan Yang, Yang Shen, Meng-Zhu Mo, Xiao-Dong |
author_facet | Fan, Shuang Huo, Wen-Xuan Yang, Yang Shen, Meng-Zhu Mo, Xiao-Dong |
author_sort | Fan, Shuang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ruxolitinib is an important treatment for steroid refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD). Therefore, we reported the updated results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of ruxolitinib as treatment for SR-GVHD. In addition, we wanted to compare the efficacy and safety between children and adults with SR-GVHD. Overall response rate (ORR) after ruxolitinib treatment was chosen as the primary end point. Complete response rate (CRR), infection, myelosuppression, and overall survival (OS) were chosen as secondary end points. A total of 37 studies were included in this meta-analysis, and 1,580 patients were enrolled. ORR at any time after ruxolitinib treatment was 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68–0.84] and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74–0.81), respectively, for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD. CRR at any time after ruxolitinib treatment was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.40–0.57) and 0.15 (95% CI: 0.10–0.23), respectively, for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD. The ORRs at any time after treatment was highest in mouth SR-cGVHD, followed by skin, gut, joints and fascia, liver, eyes, esophagus, and lung SR-cGVHD. The incidence rate of infections after ruxolitinib treatment was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.45–0.76) and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.31–0.63), respectively, for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD. The incidence rates of overall (grades I–IV) and severe (grades III–IV) cytopenia were 53.2% (95% CI: 16.0%–90.4%) and 31.0% (95% CI: 0.0–100.0%), respectively, for SR-aGVHD, and were 28.8% (95% CI:13.0%–44.6%) and 10.4% (95% CI: 0.0–27.9%), respectively, for SR-cGVHD. The probability rate of OS at 6 months after treatment was 63.9% (95% CI: 52.5%–75.2%) for SR-aGVHD. The probability rates of OS at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after treatment were 95% (95% CI: 79.5%–100.0%), 78.7% (95% CI: 67.2%–90.1%), and 75.3% (95% CI: 68.0%–82.7%), respectively, for SR-cGVHD. The ORR, CRR, infection events, and myelosuppression were all comparable between children and adults with SR-GVHD. In summary, this study suggests that ruxolitinib is an effective and safe treatment for SR-GVHD, and both children and adults with SR-GVHD could benefit from ruxolitinib treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9386528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93865282022-08-19 Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease: A meta-analysis Fan, Shuang Huo, Wen-Xuan Yang, Yang Shen, Meng-Zhu Mo, Xiao-Dong Front Immunol Immunology Ruxolitinib is an important treatment for steroid refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD). Therefore, we reported the updated results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of ruxolitinib as treatment for SR-GVHD. In addition, we wanted to compare the efficacy and safety between children and adults with SR-GVHD. Overall response rate (ORR) after ruxolitinib treatment was chosen as the primary end point. Complete response rate (CRR), infection, myelosuppression, and overall survival (OS) were chosen as secondary end points. A total of 37 studies were included in this meta-analysis, and 1,580 patients were enrolled. ORR at any time after ruxolitinib treatment was 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68–0.84] and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74–0.81), respectively, for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD. CRR at any time after ruxolitinib treatment was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.40–0.57) and 0.15 (95% CI: 0.10–0.23), respectively, for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD. The ORRs at any time after treatment was highest in mouth SR-cGVHD, followed by skin, gut, joints and fascia, liver, eyes, esophagus, and lung SR-cGVHD. The incidence rate of infections after ruxolitinib treatment was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.45–0.76) and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.31–0.63), respectively, for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD. The incidence rates of overall (grades I–IV) and severe (grades III–IV) cytopenia were 53.2% (95% CI: 16.0%–90.4%) and 31.0% (95% CI: 0.0–100.0%), respectively, for SR-aGVHD, and were 28.8% (95% CI:13.0%–44.6%) and 10.4% (95% CI: 0.0–27.9%), respectively, for SR-cGVHD. The probability rate of OS at 6 months after treatment was 63.9% (95% CI: 52.5%–75.2%) for SR-aGVHD. The probability rates of OS at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after treatment were 95% (95% CI: 79.5%–100.0%), 78.7% (95% CI: 67.2%–90.1%), and 75.3% (95% CI: 68.0%–82.7%), respectively, for SR-cGVHD. The ORR, CRR, infection events, and myelosuppression were all comparable between children and adults with SR-GVHD. In summary, this study suggests that ruxolitinib is an effective and safe treatment for SR-GVHD, and both children and adults with SR-GVHD could benefit from ruxolitinib treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9386528/ /pubmed/35990629 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.954268 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fan, Huo, Yang, Shen and Mo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Fan, Shuang Huo, Wen-Xuan Yang, Yang Shen, Meng-Zhu Mo, Xiao-Dong Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease: A meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease: A meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease: A meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease: a meta-analysis |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9386528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35990629 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.954268 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fanshuang efficacyandsafetyofruxolitinibinsteroidrefractorygraftversushostdiseaseametaanalysis AT huowenxuan efficacyandsafetyofruxolitinibinsteroidrefractorygraftversushostdiseaseametaanalysis AT yangyang efficacyandsafetyofruxolitinibinsteroidrefractorygraftversushostdiseaseametaanalysis AT shenmengzhu efficacyandsafetyofruxolitinibinsteroidrefractorygraftversushostdiseaseametaanalysis AT moxiaodong efficacyandsafetyofruxolitinibinsteroidrefractorygraftversushostdiseaseametaanalysis |