Cargando…

Determinants of male involvement in family planning services in Abia State, Southeast Nigeria

BACKGROUND: Male involvement in family planning (FP) remains low in male-dominant communities. Family planning contributes to the regulation of fertility and population growth in Nigeria. Increasing male involvement in family planning services is crucial in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amuzie, Chidinma Ihuoma, Nwamoh, Uche Ngozi, Ukegbu, Andrew, Umeokonkwo, Chukwuma David, Azuogu, Benedict Ndubueze, Agbo, Ugonma Okpechi, Balogun, Muhammad Shakir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9386938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35982494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-022-00182-z
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Male involvement in family planning (FP) remains low in male-dominant communities. Family planning contributes to the regulation of fertility and population growth in Nigeria. Increasing male involvement in family planning services is crucial in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality in patriarchal societies such as Nigeria. This study identified the determinants of male involvement in family planning services in Abia State, Nigeria. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in twelve communities of Abia State, Nigeria. A total of 588 married men who met the eligibility criteria were recruited using a multistage sampling technique. An interviewer-administered semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect data on the variables. Univariate, bivariate and multivariate analysis was done. The level of significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: The overall level of active male involvement in family planning services was 55.1% (95% CI:51.0–59.2%). The mean age of the respondents was 42.4 ± 8.0 years. Access to television (aOR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.05–2.39), spouse employment status (aOR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.33–2.06), joint decision-making (aOR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.05–2.62), and accompanying spouse to the FP clinic (aOR = 3.15, 95% CI: 2.16–4.62) were determinants of active male involvement. CONCLUSION: At least, one out of every two men was actively involved in family planning services. This was determined by access to television, employment status of spouse, joint decision-making, and accompanying spouse to the FP clinic. There is a need to focus on the identified factors in order to further improve the active involvement of men in FP services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40834-022-00182-z.