Cargando…

Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits

[Image: see text] Three of the main challenges in achieving rapid decarbonization of the electric power sector in the near term are getting to net-zero while maintaining grid reliability and minimizing cost. In this policy analysis, we evaluate the performance of a variety of generation strategies u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Jeffrey J., Rode, David C., Zhai, Haibo, Fischbeck, Paul S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9387094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35926127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06661
_version_ 1784769951261786112
author Anderson, Jeffrey J.
Rode, David C.
Zhai, Haibo
Fischbeck, Paul S.
author_facet Anderson, Jeffrey J.
Rode, David C.
Zhai, Haibo
Fischbeck, Paul S.
author_sort Anderson, Jeffrey J.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Three of the main challenges in achieving rapid decarbonization of the electric power sector in the near term are getting to net-zero while maintaining grid reliability and minimizing cost. In this policy analysis, we evaluate the performance of a variety of generation strategies using this “triple objective” including nuclear, renewables with different energy storage options, and carbon-emitting generation with carbon capture and storage (CCS) and direct air capture and storage (DACS) technologies. Given the current U.S. tax credits for carbon sequestration under Section 45Q of the Internal Revenue Code, we find that two options: (1) cofiring bioenergy in existing coal-fired assets equipped with CCS, and (2) coupling existing natural gas combined-cycle plants equipped with CCS and DACS, robustly dominate other generation strategies across many assumptions and uncertainties. As a result, capacity-expansion modelers, planners, and policymakers should consider such combinations of carbon-constrained fossil-fuel and negative emissions technologies, together with modifications of the current national incentives, when designing the pathways to a carbon-free economy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9387094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93870942022-08-19 Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits Anderson, Jeffrey J. Rode, David C. Zhai, Haibo Fischbeck, Paul S. Environ Sci Technol [Image: see text] Three of the main challenges in achieving rapid decarbonization of the electric power sector in the near term are getting to net-zero while maintaining grid reliability and minimizing cost. In this policy analysis, we evaluate the performance of a variety of generation strategies using this “triple objective” including nuclear, renewables with different energy storage options, and carbon-emitting generation with carbon capture and storage (CCS) and direct air capture and storage (DACS) technologies. Given the current U.S. tax credits for carbon sequestration under Section 45Q of the Internal Revenue Code, we find that two options: (1) cofiring bioenergy in existing coal-fired assets equipped with CCS, and (2) coupling existing natural gas combined-cycle plants equipped with CCS and DACS, robustly dominate other generation strategies across many assumptions and uncertainties. As a result, capacity-expansion modelers, planners, and policymakers should consider such combinations of carbon-constrained fossil-fuel and negative emissions technologies, together with modifications of the current national incentives, when designing the pathways to a carbon-free economy. American Chemical Society 2022-08-04 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9387094/ /pubmed/35926127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06661 Text en © 2022 American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Anderson, Jeffrey J.
Rode, David C.
Zhai, Haibo
Fischbeck, Paul S.
Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits
title Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits
title_full Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits
title_fullStr Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits
title_full_unstemmed Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits
title_short Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits
title_sort fossil-fuel options for power sector net-zero emissions with sequestration tax credits
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9387094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35926127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06661
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonjeffreyj fossilfueloptionsforpowersectornetzeroemissionswithsequestrationtaxcredits
AT rodedavidc fossilfueloptionsforpowersectornetzeroemissionswithsequestrationtaxcredits
AT zhaihaibo fossilfueloptionsforpowersectornetzeroemissionswithsequestrationtaxcredits
AT fischbeckpauls fossilfueloptionsforpowersectornetzeroemissionswithsequestrationtaxcredits